Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On 1/13/2023 9:08 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/13/23 6:59 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 1/13/23 22:45, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > >> On 1/13/23 7:39 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/11

Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:59:04AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > The project plan (that could be drafted on an A4 paper) could look like, > gather around all distro maintainers of Linux distro's that are shipping > Xen, and then search for a 'Project owner', which we totally need to be > some

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:59:04AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > I like this very much. This is the kind of thing that helps admins of > systems that have just local disks and a few domUs. Like, the case where > you support some non-profit organization with their server stuff running > on don

Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On 1/13/23 6:59 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi, > > On 1/13/23 22:45, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> On 1/13/23 7:39 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 1/11/2023 10:58 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/9/23 12:5

Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

Hi, On 1/13/23 22:45, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/13/23 7:39 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >>> On 1/11/2023 10:58 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi! [...] Yolo sty

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On 1/13/23 7:39 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> On 1/11/2023 10:58 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> > On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> > > Hi! >> > > >> > > On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> >

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/11/2023 10:58 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > > On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > > >> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > > >> > > >> thanks > > >> >

Bug#1028251: New Patch (Was: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64)

On 1/11/2023 10:58 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > >> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> On 1/9/23 8:09 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > >>> Hi Chuck, > >>> > >>> On 1/8

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi! > > On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo >> >> thanks >> >> On 1/9/23 8:09 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >>> Hi Chuck, >>> >>> On 1/8/23 23:18, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: [...] The build faile

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

On 1/9/23 12:55 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi! > > On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > ... > This is why it is very much recommended to build the packages using > something like sbuild, so that you can be sure that every time it will > start with a super minimal chroot which only

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

Hi! On 09/01/2023 18:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > > thanks > > On 1/9/23 8:09 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> Hi Chuck, >> >> On 1/8/23 23:18, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> The build failed: >>> >>>debian/rules override_dh_missing >>> make[1]: Ente

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo thanks On 1/9/23 8:09 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > On 1/8/23 23:18, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> [...] >> >> The build failed: >> >>debian/rules override_dh_missing >> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/chuckz/sources-sid/xen/xen-4.17.0' >> dh_mis

Bug#1028251: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

Hi Chuck, On 1/8/23 23:18, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > [...] > > The build failed: > >debian/rules override_dh_missing > make[1]: Entering directory '/home/chuckz/sources-sid/xen/xen-4.17.0' > dh_missing --list-missing > dh_missing: warning: usr/lib/modules-load.d/xen.conf exists in debian/tmp

Bug#1028251: xen: FTBFS when building xen binary packages for sid on x86_64

Source: xen Version: 4.17.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs patch Dear Maintainer, Hi, I needed to test a patch to libxl so I started by trying to build xen from source on an up-to-date sid installation. The build failed: debian/rules override_dh_missing make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ch