On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 20:16:55 +, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> > [...] Now I'm wondering if changing the runtime dependency to
> > "graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat | imagemagick" would achieve the
> > same while allowing the user to choose (or keep) one of the two
> > implementations?
> good point
Hi Gregor,
[...] > Now I'm wondering if changing the runtime dependency to
"graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat | imagemagick" would achieve the
same while allowing the user to choose (or keep) one of the two
implementations?
good point! I noticed that imagemagick contains mogrify-im6.q16, but m
Package: jhead
Version: 1:3.06.0.1-4
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
jhead/1:3.06.0.1-4 gained a new runtime dependency on
graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat. This means that I would need to
switch from imagemagick to graphicsmagick{,-imagemagick-compat}.
Not that
3 matches
Mail list logo