Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 06:39:18PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Are you sure it is not embdeded base64 encoded png or minified javascript* ? Yes, I'm absolutely certain. > If not we could try to know why it choke ? I already gave a full explanation of this in my first message, which for s

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:27:40PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > > > > source package, though I can't see how Lintian could possibly > > > > > > expect to > > > > > > know that. > > > > > > Are you sure it is not embdeded base64 encoded png or minified > > > javascript* ? > > > > > > If

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-08 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le jeudi 8 février 2024, 19:57:22 UTC Bill Allombert a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 06:39:18PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Le jeudi 8 février 2024, 18:31:28 UTC Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > > > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:23:18 +0200 Bill Allombert > > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 18

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 06:39:18PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Le jeudi 8 février 2024, 18:31:28 UTC Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:23:18 +0200 Bill Allombert > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:14:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > Package: lintian

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-08 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le jeudi 8 février 2024, 18:31:28 UTC Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:23:18 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:14:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Package: lintian > > > Version: 2.115.3 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Lintian issues these

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2024-02-08 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:23:18 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:14:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Package: lintian > > Version: 2.115.3 > > Severity: normal > > > > Lintian issues these errors for putty 0.77-1: > > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/App

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2023-10-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:14:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.115.3 > Severity: normal > > Lintian issues these errors for putty 0.77-1: > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixA.html] > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixB.ht

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2022-09-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:11:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I think the right thing for putty here is for upstream to remove the > HTML from their VCS and tarballs, then add the generation process to > their build system and continuous integration, so that they always know > when there are problem

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2022-09-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 00:14:07 +0100 Colin Watson wrote: > This is pretty oversensitive.  Firstly, it's HTML, which is still often > enough written by hand anyway.  As it happens, these particular HTML > files are generated from halibut input that's also provided in the > source package, though I ca

Bug#1019980: lintian: source-is-missing check for HTML is much too sensitive

2022-09-17 Thread Colin Watson
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: normal Lintian issues these errors for putty 0.77-1: E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixA.html] E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixB.html] E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixE.html] E: putty