Both ways are fine. If you upload -3 right now, NMU will be rejected
because of the newer version, otherwise it'll reach the archive when
time elapses.
A maintainer upload would be better, though :-)
--
Cheers,
Luca
On Aug 29, 2022 at 6:52:06 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
> ha scritto:
>
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
>
>
> Sure, here it i
Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
ha scritto:
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
Sure, here it is:
https://salsa.debian.org/ssgelm/opentracing-cpp/-/merge_reques
On Aug 28, 2022 at 4:29:03 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Control: tags 1017132 + patch
> Control: tags 1017132 + pending
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for opentracing-cpp (versioned as 1.6.0-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it lo
Control: tags 1017132 + patch
Control: tags 1017132 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for opentracing-cpp (versioned as 1.6.0-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Luca
diff -Nru opentracing-cpp-1.6.0/debian/changelog
5 matches
Mail list logo
