Bug#1014400: libisofs: Add symbol file

2022-07-12 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > So if the Debian packaging software decides on its own that > > libisofs-1.5.2 is enough at package build time, then compilation > > [of libisoburn] will fail. Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > In an ideal world, the symbols should be backward compatible and then the > 'symbols' mechanism

Bug#1014400: libisofs: Add symbol file

2022-07-11 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
Hey Thomas, Thanks for the quick answer (you may even be too fast for me :)). On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 4:37 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > do i get it right that the format is specified by > https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/ImprovedDpkgShlibdeps > ? > > If so, then the goal of having the fi

Bug#1014400: libisofs: Add symbol file

2022-07-05 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, do i get it right that the format is specified by https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/ImprovedDpkgShlibdeps ? If so, then the goal of having the file "In many cases, the dependency generated is too strict as the application doesn't necessarily use the newly-added symbols which justify

Bug#1014400: libisofs: Add symbol file

2022-07-05 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
Package: libisofs Version: 1.5.4 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, The attached patch adds a symbol file for the libisofs library. Thanks for considering the patch. -- System Information: Debian Releas