Bug#1012004: srpc: Unorthodox binary package content organization

2022-06-08 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 14:03:06 +, Lance Lin wrote: > > Ideally the .a archive and the .so linked script (which just redirects > > the linker to always use the .a archive, so there's no actual shared > > library), should be moved into the libsrpc-dev package as the usual > > convention. The vers

Bug#1012004: srpc: Unorthodox binary package content organization

2022-05-28 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: srpc Source-Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: normal Hi! This package has a rather unorthodox package contents organization. There are two binary packages generated: a) libsrpc-dev: Contains the usual headers (but no .a archive nor .so symlink or linker script). b) libsrpc: Is an unver