Bug#1011146: upgrade-system is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-05-29 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Hi all, As other dev/maintainers, I got a the autoremoval notification for package resource-agents-paf, which has nothing to do with nvidia things. Maybe what maintainers should do might be clarified here? Should we just sit & wait for the next notification about the false positive bug being fixe

Bug#1011146: upgrade-system is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-05-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: retitle -1 autoremoval false positive bug: https://bugs.debian.org/1011268 -- nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192 Control: block -1 with 1011268 On 26/05/2022 08.31, Martin-Éric Racine wrot

Bug#1011146: upgrade-system is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-05-26 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Thursday, 26 May 2022 08:38:04 CEST Ramon Fried wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2022 09:31:00 +0300 > =?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?= > wrote: > > I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion > > that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be > > au

Bug#1011146: upgrade-system is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-05-25 Thread Ramon Fried
On Thu, 26 May 2022 09:31:00 +0300 =?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?= wrote: > I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion > that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be > auto-removed. > > Martin-Éric > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian

Bug#1011146: upgrade-system is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-05-25 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be auto-removed. Martin-Éric On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > > upgrade-system 1.9.1.0 is marked for autoremoval from