Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.35.0-1
Tags: patch
Followup-For: Bug #1010264
Dear Maintainer,
I created a patch which corect this issue.
The correction contained in this patch was taken from the following
posts.
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2022-June/089751.html
Could you check thi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Theodore, btw the BTS reference for the e2fsprogs issue is #1010263
> and the CVE id CVE-2022-1304.
Yes, I've noted that already.
> #1010264 and CVE-2022-28391 is respectively for busybox. the bug
> already reassigned acco
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:04:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:29:00PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Neither seems to be security related. Are you sure this was correctly
> > filed against e2fsprogs?
>
> Apologies, I reported multiple incoming new issues f
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:29:00PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Neither seems to be security related. Are you sure this was correctly
> filed against e2fsprogs?
Apologies, I reported multiple incoming new issues from the CVE feed
and I must have mis-pasted the wrong Emacs buffer into the report.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 01:55:27PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.46.5-2
> Severity: important
>
> This issue was found by Alpine:
> https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/13661
>
> Details and the patches they used are in the report above, but t
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.46.5-2
Severity: important
This issue was found by Alpine:
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/13661
Details and the patches they used are in the report above, but the
patches are not yet merged upstream, might be worth to wait until
that's fixed si
6 matches
Mail list logo
