Bug#1008507:

2022-04-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2022-03-29 17:53, Joshua Hudson wrote: > diff -ur glibc.orig/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c > glibc/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c > --- glibc.orig/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c2022-03-29 > 17:50:12.558027042 -0700 > +++ glibc/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux

Bug#1008507:

2022-03-29 Thread Joshua Hudson
diff -ur glibc.orig/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c glibc/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c --- glibc.orig/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c2022-03-29 17:50:12.558027042 -0700 +++ glibc/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pathconf.c2022-03-29 17:52:33.262157543 -0700 @@ -18

Bug#1008507:

2022-03-29 Thread Joshua Hudson
/* reproduce glibc bug */ /* * I don't typically care what the return of pathconf(..., _PC_LINK_MAX) * is; I just care whether or not it's greater than 1 because I'm checking * whether the filesystem supports hard links or not. */ #include #include #include #include #include #include i

Bug#1008507: libc6: pathconf("mountpont of FAT filesystem", _PC_LINK_MAX) returns 127, expected 1

2022-03-27 Thread Joshua
Package: libc6 Version: All of them Severity: normal Tags: newcomer Dear Maintainer, what lead up to the situation is well-described in my stackoverflow post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71641957/how-to-check-if-a-filesystem-supports-hard-links-in-linux Since posting it, I have traced th