On 2022-04-06 11:13, wangtianzhu wrote:
INPUT_METHOD have also been added in the patch.
INPUT_METHOD can be used to distinguish fcitx4 and fcitx5.
Please submit a separate bug about that. If you do, I think you need to
elaborate on the justification.
--
Rgds,
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
; From: Shengjing Zhu
> To: Osamu Aoki
> Cc: Gunnar Hjalmarsson , 1008...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#1008481: Add SDL_IM_MODULE to fcitx4 and fcitx5
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:32 +0800
>
> ...
> > In conclusion,
> >
> > For SDL_IM_MODULE
> &
INPUT_METHOD have also been added in the patch.
INPUT_METHOD can be used to distinguish fcitx4 and fcitx5.
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Shengjing Zhu
> To: Osamu Aoki
> Cc: Gunnar Hjalmarsson , 1008...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#1008481: Add SDL_IM_MODULE to fcitx4 and fcitx5
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:32 +0800
>
> ...
> > In conclusi
> To: Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> > > Cc: 1008...@bugs.debian.org, Osamu Aoki
> > > Subject: Re: Bug#1008481: Add SDL_IM_MODULE to fcitx4 and fcitx5
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 03:27:36 +0800
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:13 PM Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Let me assess situation more verbosely.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shengjing Zhu
> > To: Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> > Cc: 1008...@bugs.debian.org, Osamu Aoki
> > Subject: Re:
Hi,
Let me assess situation more verbosely.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shengjing Zhu
> To: Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> Cc: 1008...@bugs.debian.org, Osamu Aoki
> Subject: Re: Bug#1008481: Add SDL_IM_MODULE to fcitx4 and fcitx5
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 03:27:36 +0800
&
On 2022-03-28 21:27, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson
wrote:
But with that said, I don't think it makes sense to spam the
users' environment with duplicate variables. Upstream already makes
use of the well established XMODIFIERS variable, and by parsing it
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>
> On 2022-03-28 08:28, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:37 AM Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> These bugs seem somewhat similar:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990316
> >> https://
On 2022-03-28 08:28, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:37 AM Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
These bugs seem somewhat similar:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990316
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008481
AFAICT, GLFW_IM_MODULE is different from SD
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:37 AM Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> These bugs seem somewhat similar:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990316
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008481
>
AFAICT, GLFW_IM_MODULE is different from SDL_IM_MODULE.
I can't find GLFW_IM
: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: Bug#1008481: Add SDL_IM_MODULE to fcitx4 and fcitx5
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:06:22 +0800
>
> Source: im-config
> Version: 0.50-2
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
>
> Origin from
> https://sa
Source: im-config
Version: 0.50-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
Origin from
https://salsa.debian.org/input-method-team/im-config/-/merge_requests/14
I asked the author to submit a bug first. But we haven't received so far.
sdl2 supports reading SDL_IM_MODULE, but the supporte
13 matches
Mail list logo
