On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:30 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Yadd (2022-04-06 18:12:30)
> > On 19/03/2022 08:38, Yadd wrote:
> > > On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote:
> > >> On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > >>> Source: node-lodash
> > >>> Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
>
Quoting Yadd (2022-04-06 18:12:30)
> On 19/03/2022 08:38, Yadd wrote:
> > On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote:
> >> On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >>> Source: node-lodash
> >>> Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
> >>> Severity: important
> >>> Tags: ftbfs
> >>>
> >>> This package fa
On 19/03/2022 08:38, Yadd wrote:
On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote:
On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Source: node-lodash
Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached.
The real problem comes from uglify-j
On 19/03/2022 08:38, Yadd wrote:
On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote:
On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Source: node-lodash
Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached.
The real problem comes from uglify-j
On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote:
On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Source: node-lodash
Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached.
The real problem comes from uglify-js call. Build works fine with
ugl
On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Source: node-lodash
Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.196.20210220-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached.
The real problem comes from uglify-js call. Build works fine with
uglifyjs 2 (as required by node-locas
6 matches
Mail list logo
