I've filed the RM bug here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014990
Seems that we still have a bunch of blockers -- so this is not likely
happening soon.
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 20:16 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi
>
> libtbb2 is now gone from testing. Please file a RM bug for s
Hi,
On 2022-06-14 13:05, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I've noticed some binNMUs failed on armel; mathicgb [1] (subsequently
> fixed by maintainer upload) and r-cran-rcppparallel [2]. Both seem to
> fail in a similar way:
>
> /usr/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/l
Hi
I've noticed some binNMUs failed on armel; mathicgb [1] (subsequently
fixed by maintainer upload) and r-cran-rcppparallel [2]. Both seem to
fail in a similar way:
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8
Hi Mo,
On 2022-06-13 18:54, M. Zhou wrote:
> Thank you so much for the help! I was still looking for time slot
> to login into a build server to deal with this hard-to-build package.
Thank you for updating the onetbb package! Building and uploading it was
not that much of a work. Admittedly, ratt
Hi Andrius,
Thank you so much for the help! I was still looking for time slot
to login into a build server to deal with this hard-to-build package.
Nowadays I sort of started to dislike packages that my laptop cannot
easily build within a few minutes :-)
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 11:57 +0300, Andriu
Hi,
On 2022-06-12 10:29, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Please go ahead with the upload of onetbb to unstable.
Uploaded. Thanks for the guidance!
Best wishes,
Andrius
Control: tags -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
Hi
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 18:39, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> In the meantime I am test-rebuilding plastimatch, now unblocked by
> #1005485.
There you will hit #1012439, but plastimatch is now no longer in testing.
Please go ahead with the upload of onetbb to
Hi Graham,
On 2022-06-03 17:14, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Unrelated FTBFS
> ===
>
> freeture - not in testing
> gmsh - https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/gmsh.html
> kicad - https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/kicad.html
> limereg - not in testing
> madnes
Hi Andrius
Thanks for your work on this. My comments below are inlined.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 09:06, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Unrelated FTBFS
> ===
>
> freeture - not in testing
> gmsh - https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/gmsh.html
> kicad - https://tests.reproducibl
Hi
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 03:11, M. Zhou wrote:
> I personally dislike making the old package libtbb2-dev.
> How about we make the old src:tbb package go through NEW again
> with the following renames:
>
> libtbb-dev -> libtbb-legacy-dev, this sounds much better than libtbb2-dev
> be
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 20:29:02 +0200 Graham Inggs
wrote:> I noticed some packages in the tracker not appearing in your list;
> e.g. openimageio, pcl and yade. These packages have transitive
> build-dependencies on libtbb-dev through e.g. libopenvdb-dev or
> libvtk9-dev, and should be investi
On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 20:29 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> I noticed some packages in the tracker not appearing in your list;
> e.g. openimageio, pcl and yade. These packages have transitive
> build-dependencies on libtbb-dev through e.g. libopenvdb-dev or
> libvtk9-
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi
I noticed some packages in the tracker not appearing in your list;
e.g. openimageio, pcl and yade. These packages have transitive
build-dependencies on libtbb-dev through e.g. libopenvdb-dev or
libvtk9-dev, and should be investigated as well.
Note that we will req
This is the most uneasy transition I've ever handled. There was
massive upstream code overhaul breaking basically everything.
Build system has changed so I rewritten the d/rules, this took
me a while.
Going through NEW due to upstream rename took a while.
Then only amd64 does not FTBFS. I wrote
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Reverse-Build-Depends
* blender [irrelevant; ftpfs, no matching function for call to openvdb... ]
#1011653
* bowtie [ok]
* bowtie2 [ok]
* casparcg-server [ftbfs, TBB not found during cmake] #1011654
* deal.ii [ftbfs, cmake could not find tbb] #1011655
* embree [ok]
* f
Hello,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:30:08 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
> this breaks everything immediately because of the conflicting libtbb2 and
> libtbb12. Please fix this first.
This has been fixed recently with tbb/2020.3-2 and onetbb/2021.5.0-8
uploads.
Best,
Andrius
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 17:55 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > libtbb2 and libtbb12 contains some common files hence the conflict.
> > I'd rather wait for all the reverse deps to be ready for this
> > transition, compared to going through NEW again due to binary
> > package change.
>
> This
On 2022-03-24 11:43:49, M. Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 13:12 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > >
> > > "I heard from archlinux" is not good enough. I sent you email about
> > > this without getting a reply, then filed #1006920, without getting a
> > > reply, now this incomplete proposal. yo
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 13:12 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >
> > "I heard from archlinux" is not good enough. I sent you email about
> > this without getting a reply, then filed #1006920, without getting a
> > reply, now this incomplete proposal. you may want to look at all the
> > build rdeps fo
Hi lumin,
On 14-03-2022 02:30, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.03.22 21:59, M. Zhou wrote:
I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux
developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And
some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as
a result. I guess we can take simila
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:30:08 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux
> > developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And
> > some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as
> > a result. I guess we can take similar measures fo
On 13.03.22 21:59, M. Zhou wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
This involves an upstream source name change (from tbb to onetbb),
as well as SOVERSION bump (from 2 to 12), along with a major API
c
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/onetbb.html
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-03-13 16:59:48 -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi release team,
>
> Thi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
This involves an upstream source name change (from tbb to onetbb),
as well as SOVERSION bump (from 2 to 12), along with a major API
change including some changes in the
24 matches
Mail list logo
