[Lucas Nussbaum]
> In that case, I don't understand why you don't use a native package
> instead? (And 3.0 (native) ?)
Mostly because native packages make NMUs with patches in d/patches/
harder. I am sure there is a better way to handle this, and welcome
your suggestions and input. :)
--
Happy
Hi,
On 11/03/22 at 09:41 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Dear Lucas,
>
> Not the worst of ideas, but it might be useful to keep in mind that the
> reason I use the 1.0 source format is to be able to wrap up debian
> packages directly from the upstream repository without releasing
> upstrea
Dear Lucas,
Not the worst of ideas, but it might be useful to keep in mind that the
reason I use the 1.0 source format is to be able to wrap up debian
packages directly from the upstream repository without releasing
upstream tarballs. The 3.0 (quilt) format is not suitable for this.
It should
Source: ng-utils
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documen
4 matches
Mail list logo
