On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 at 07:27:36 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Ah, whoops, looks like I screwed up in two ways here. I meant to write
> "then removes the *group* executable bits" and the patch should match:
>
> -override_dh_fixperms:
> -dh_fixperms -Xusr/libexec/installed-tests
> +execut
Hi Simon,
>> Instead of not calling dh_fixperms at all, a patch is attached that
>> lets it run as usual but then removes the executable bits.
>
> I don't think this is correct either: the executables need to be
> executable, and the test data needs to be non-executable.
Ah, whoops, looks like I
Control: tags -1 - patch
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 at 08:11:51 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Instead of not calling dh_fixperms at all, a patch is attached that
> lets it run as usual but then removes the executable bits.
I don't think this is correct either: the executables need to be
executable, and the
Source: sdl12-compat
Version: 1.2.52-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Simon,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
sdl12-compat could n
4 matches
Mail list logo
