Bug#1005887: unixodbc-dev does not contain unixodbc_conf.h

2022-02-22 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hallo Jan, On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 07:06, Jan Wielemaker wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. I'm not convinced. You are telling that we > must define macros to make sql.h get the right type for SQLBIGINT. > Getting the right type (some alias for int64_t or a struct) is IMO > something that should

Bug#1005887: unixodbc-dev does not contain unixodbc_conf.h

2022-02-21 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Hi Hugh, Thanks for your answer. I'm not convinced. You are telling that we must define macros to make sql.h get the right type for SQLBIGINT. Getting the right type (some alias for int64_t or a struct) is IMO something that should be done by unixodb such that the application gets a working S

Bug#1005887: unixodbc-dev does not contain unixodbc_conf.h

2022-02-19 Thread dogsleg
Hi Hugh, Thanks for your reply. Hugh McMaster писал 2022-02-19 14:11: > Hi Lev, > > Thank you for the bug report. > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 04:45, Lev Lamberov wrote: >> >> unixodbc-dev does not ship unixodbc_conf.h (at least, on amd64 and >> i386). The version in stable does ship it, but the

Bug#1005887: unixodbc-dev does not contain unixodbc_conf.h

2022-02-16 Thread Lev Lamberov
Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 2.3.9-4 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: dogs...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, unixodbc-dev does not ship unixodbc_conf.h (at least, on amd64 and i386). The version in stable does ship it, but the version in testing and unstable does not. It breaks builds of some pa