Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-26 Thread Yadd
On 26/01/2022 16:20, Yadd wrote: On 22/01/2022 10:28, Yadd wrote: Hi, I wrote a quick-and-dirty patch for UInt32, you just have to detect 32/16/8 bits with thing.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT and fix the call of my new function. Else I'll probably able to fix that next week. Cheers, Yadd Hi, fixed

Bug#1004077: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004077: Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-26 Thread Yadd
On 22/01/2022 10:28, Yadd wrote: Hi, I wrote a quick-and-dirty patch for UInt32, you just have to detect 32/16/8 bits with thing.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT and fix the call of my new function. Else I'll probably able to fix that next week. Cheers, Yadd Hi, fixed locally except ripemd160 test (pr

Bug#1004077: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-22 Thread Yadd
am, >Let me look into this. > >Thanks, >-Dipak > > > >From: "Graham Inggs" >To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" >Date: 20/01/2022 05:03 PM >Subject:[EXTERNAL] Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest >regression on s390x &g

Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-22 Thread Dipak Zope1
Sure Graham, Let me look into this. Thanks, -Dipak From: "Graham Inggs" To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" Date: 20/01/2022 05:03 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x Source: node-pbkdf2 Version: 3.1.1-1

Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: node-pbkdf2 Version: 3.1.1-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Since 3.1.1-1, node-pbkdf2's autopkgtests have been failing on the big-endian s390x architecture [1].