On 2022-02-10 15:19:57, Alex wrote:
> On donderdag 10 februari 2022 14:59:59 CET Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > The "collectd" package recommends libperl5.34 as it has a loadable
> > > module built against libperl5.34. The transition criteria however
> > > will not consider rebuilding the package even th
On donderdag 10 februari 2022 14:59:59 CET Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The "collectd" package recommends libperl5.34 as it has a loadable
> > module built against libperl5.34. The transition criteria however
> > will not consider rebuilding the package even though in the
> > current state in unstable it
Hi Alex,
On 10-02-2022 13:21, Alex wrote:
I was wondering why the condition for the perl-5.34 transition has the
"depends" in the condition, but not the "recommends"?
I think because we never did that in the past, I *assume* the tracker
was based on the previous one.
The "collectd" package
Hi,
I was wondering why the condition for the perl-5.34 transition has the
"depends" in the condition, but not the "recommends"?
The "collectd" package recommends libperl5.34 as it has a loadable
module built against libperl5.34. The transition criteria however will
not consider rebuilding the pa
Hi Niko,
On 09-02-2022 22:49, Niko Tyni wrote:
Not sure about the format but hope the attached will do. Each line has
the package to be rescheduled, and then a list of packages that need
to be pulled from unstable. I haven't checked whether the lists are
absolutely minimal for this, but a few to
Hi Paul, Sebastian and others,
as discussed on IRC, here's a list of packages that need rescheduling on
ci.debian.net for the Perl 5.34 transition. Their autopkgtest checks are
failing as their Recommendations are not installable without explicitly
pulling their rebuilt dependencies from unstable.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:40:53PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Uploading this afternoon.
perl_5.34.0-3 uploaded and accepted.
--
Niko
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 11:07:19AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-02-04 10:52:11, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:49:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > On 2022-01-05 17:00:54 +, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > > > we'd like a transition slot for Perl 5.34.
> > > oc
On 2022-02-04 10:52:11, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:49:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On 2022-01-05 17:00:54 +, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > > we'd like a transition slot for Perl 5.34.
> > ocaml is done, so please go ahead.
>
> Thanks!
>
> My last rebuilds found that
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:49:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2022-01-05 17:00:54 +, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > we'd like a transition slot for Perl 5.34.
> ocaml is done, so please go ahead.
Thanks!
My last rebuilds found that graphviz has regressed and doesn't build
anymore (#10049
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-01-23 12:45:16, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1002681
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl-5.34.html
>
> On 2022-01-05 17:00:54 +, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.de
Control: block -1 by 1002681
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl-5.34.html
On 2022-01-05 17:00:54 +, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, p...@packages.debian.org
Control: block -1 with 1002093 997267 997189
Hi,
we'd like a transition slot for Perl 5.34.
Should have done this months ago, but rea
13 matches
Mail list logo
