Hey folks,
> I've looked over your report and baffling patch.
> This is really strange, and I don't have much to add.
>
> It seems like it might be related to the pathsubst rules in
> src/doc/Makefile.in.
> But I don't see the build directory getting used there.
Oh ho ho, this is fun! So, curious
Hi.
I've looked over your report and baffling patch.
This is really strange, and I don't have much to add.
It seems like it might be related to the pathsubst rules in
src/doc/Makefile.in.
But I don't see the build directory getting used there.
On 2021-11-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I have not observed this in the tests.reproducible-builds.org history,
> although krb5 currently FTBFS
And now that the FTBFS is fixed, it does appear on
tests.reproducible-builds.org for amd64, i386, arm64 and armhf
architectures for both unstable and exp
Source: krb5
Severity: minor
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: buildpath
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
I have not observed this in the tests.reproducible-builds.org history,
although krb5 currently FTBFS, but when building krb5 locally using
repr
4 matches
Mail list logo
