Bug#1000238: dnsproxy: Packaging licensing incompatible with upstream

2021-12-10 Thread Marcos Talau
Considering that Boyuan Yang has made several changes to several files and request use in Public-Domain, and that Patrick said he accepts an upstream compatible license, I'm going to use Public-Domain rather than MIT. Cheers, mt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1000238: dnsproxy: Packaging licensing incompatible with upstream

2021-11-20 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hello, are you writing me to ask if I am in agreement with changing the Licensing of the packaging? If yes, I hereby agree to change the Licensing of my contributions to the packaging to a compatible license. Best Regards, Patrick Am Samstag, 20. November 2021 schrieb Marcos Talau : > I receive

Bug#1000238: dnsproxy: Packaging licensing incompatible with upstream

2021-11-19 Thread Marcos Talau
I received an Undelivered for Patrick Schoenfeld , so in Cc I am trying another contact with Patrick. Patrick, below the original message. Cheers, mt On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:02:43PM -0300, Marcos Talau wrote: > Package: dnsproxy > Version: 1.17-1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@tal

Bug#1000238: dnsproxy: Packaging licensing incompatible with upstream

2021-11-19 Thread Marcos Talau
Package: dnsproxy Version: 1.17-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@talau.info The current packaging licensing (GPL-2) is incompatible with upstream licensing (MIT). It is a hampering condition to submit patches from Debian to upstream. I am adopting the package and I intend to change the pac