Bug#1079955: bcal: please add support for loong64

Dear maintainer: I have verified the patch locally, would you consider merging it? If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. thanks, xiaojuan Zhai diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index c1e92ba..a2fb0be 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ V

Bug#1053593: polyml: Please support for loongarch64

Dear maintainer, Could you please consider upgrading the version to add support for loong64? If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. thanks, xiaojuan Zhai

Bug#1087977: Add loong64 support

Dear maintainer, Could you consider merging the patch? Looking forward to your reply. If you have any questions, you can contact me at any time. Thanks!

Bug#1055135: vkd3d: Please modify control for Loongarch support

Dear maintainer, I have verified this patch locally, could you consider merging it? zhaixiaojuan

Bug#1059196: Re: naev： Please add loong64 binary output

Dear Maintainer, I have verified the patch locally. Could you consider adding support for loong64? zhaixiaojuan

Bug#1099721: gmtsar: Please add support for loong64

Dear maintainer, Thank you very much for your reply. Now we need to wait for it to be synced from git to the Debian repository, right? zhaixiaojuan

Bug#1061730: openjfx: add loongarch64 support

Dear Maintainer, I also verified this patch locally.Could you consider adding loong64 support to this package? Thanks!

Bug#1085196: checkinstall: please add support for loong64

Dear maintainers, I have verified the patch locally. Could you consider merging it? If you have any questions or suggestions, you can contact me at any time. thanks, Xiaojuan Zhai

Bug#1092979: gitaly: Please add support for loong64

Dear Maintainer, I have verified the patch locally, could you please consider merging it? If you have any questions or suggestions, you can contact me at any time. thanks, Xiaojuan Zhai

Bug#1100453: fix loong64 build error

Package:firefox-esr Version: 128.8.0esr-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 Dear firefox-esrmaintainers, Currently, 128.8.0esr-1 fails to compile on the loong64 platform.The attachment is a patch I made locally, which has been verified

Bug#1089673: Add support for loong64

Dear Maintainer, I can successfully build the loong64 architecture package locally using https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nim.git, great! The current version of nim in debian.org is still 1.6.14. Should I continue to wait for it to be upgraded to version 2.2.0? Will patches be considered to be

Bug#1059196: naev： Please add loong64 binary output

Dear Maintainer, I have verified the patch locally. Could you consider adding support for loong64? If you have any questions or suggestions, you can contact me at any time. Looking forward to your response. Thanks! @font-face{ font-family:"Times New Roman"; } @font-face{ font-family:"宋体"

Bug#1089673: Add support for loong64

Package: nim Version: 1.6.14 Severity: wishlist User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 Dear nimmaintainers, Nim upstream has supported loong64 since version v2.0.0. Could you consider upgrading nim to add support for loong64? If you have any questions or suggestions, yo

Bug#1053828: liboqs: Add support for Loongarch64

Dear maintainers, The loong64 patches have been merged upstream (https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/pull/2010). Could you consider adding support for the loong64 architecture in Debian? If you have any questions, you can contact me at any time. Thanks!

Bug#1061730: openjfx: add loongarch64 support

Dear Maintainer, I checked that the upstream already supports the loongarch architecture （https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293214）. I also verified this patch locally. Can you consider upgrading the openjfx version or rolling this patch to add support for the loongarch architecture? If

Bug#1053828: liboqs: Add support for Loongarch64

Dear maintainers, I have submitted a PR to liboqs upstream, _https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/pull/2010_. I updated the patch in Debian synchronously, the patchcan be found in the attachment. If you have any questions, you can contact me at any time. Thanks! Description: Add lo

Bug#1051750: libjpeg-turbo:Please add support for new arch Loongarch

Dear Maintainer, I have also submitted a related patch in the salsa repository(https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libjpeg-turbo/-/merge_requests/9). Could you merge the patch? Thanks!

Bug#1050764: scm: Please add support for new arch Loongarch

Dear Maintainer, I also submitted the relevant patch to salsa.debian.org(https://salsa.debian.org/scheme-team/scm/-/merge_requests/3 ). Could you consider merging this patch?

Bug#1081101: scm: FTBFS: scmmain.c:120:31: error: passing argument 1 of ‘script_count_argv’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]

Hi, I found that this problem has been fixed in scm upstream. Link: https://salsa.debian.org/scheme-team/scm/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fix-numerous-compilation-errors.patch?ref_type=heads\ Thanks!

Bug#1081101: (no subject)

Hi,  I'm having the same problem, any progress and suggestions? Thanks!

Bug#1082180: nebula: add loong64 support

Package: nebula Version: 1.6.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 Dear nebula maintainers, The upstream code of nebula has supported loongarch64 since version 1.9.0. Could you consider upgrading the nebula code ? Nebula upstream PR

Bug#1081384: mesaflash: Add support for loong64

Package: mesaflash Version: 3.4.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loongarch64 Dear mesaflash maintainers, Mesaflash upstream has merged the loongarch architecture patch into 3.4.9. Could you consider updating the mesaflash source code? Upstream link