Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away

2006-11-17 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 01:27 --- Shouldn't this be fixed by Roger Sayle's recent fold-const.c patch? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away

2005-01-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 15:25 --- This is a NOP for me on AMD64 but not on i686. -- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet

Bug#173513: [Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

2005-01-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 15:14 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 *** -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#173513: [Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

2005-01-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 15:14 --- *** Bug 9079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug