Bug#1092041: fixed, and tagged

2025-01-06 Thread stef
howdy, i just tagged a new release of pwdsphinx at https://github.com/stef/pwdsphinx/releases/tag/v1.99.3-beta please not that this also depends on a new release of liboprf at https://github.com/stef/liboprf/releases/tag/v0.6.0 thanks for your kind support! s

Bug#1092041: pwdsphinx: FTBFS: ValueError: ERROR: list of user names is bigger than 64KB. 65541

2025-01-05 Thread stef
ohio, i think i got it. thanks to your kind vm contribution Santiago! <3 i put some extra debug output in the code, which showed me that there was files in the state (stored under /tmp/sphinx-oracle-root.*) that should not exist. this state is deleted recursively between test cases. and the error

Bug#1092041: Cc: Debian BTS Control

2025-01-04 Thread stef
howdy, i'm upstream. i regret to say that i cannot reproduce this. - i clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pwdsphinx - checkout debian/1.99.2-beta-5 and, - run sbuild on it, - it all succeeds. what am i doing wrong? btw the error it fails on, sounds like the test case for some reason

Bug#1081819: can't reproduce

2024-11-21 Thread stef
hey, i downloaded a riscv64 image from https://people.debian.org/~gio/dqib/ and then more or less manually executed the steps here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liboprf&arch=riscv64&ver=0.4.0-1&stamp=1727600437&raw=0 (without the fakeroot param in dpkg-buildpackage) and then t

Bug#1085466: root-cause and fix

2024-11-21 Thread stef
hey, i figured it out, the problem is that in src/makefile CFLAGS is only set if no CFLAGS is passed, and that contains the essential -fpic switch. adding a simple CFLAGS+= -fpic solves the problem for both ppc64 and the hppa archs' will, submit a fix on salsa asap. cheers,s

Bug#1081819: liboprf:FTBFS:build failure (‘-fcf-protection=full’ is not supported)

2024-09-20 Thread stef
ey try to allocate the memory for all the state needed during the rest of the protocol. so somewhere here: https://github.com/stef/liboprf/blob/master/src/tests/tp-dkg.c#L426-L465 and this is all stuff were (a lot) memory is allocated on the stack. and normally if you allocate too much, you get a

Bug#1081819: liboprf:FTBFS:build failure (‘-fcf-protection=full’ is not supported)

2024-09-15 Thread stef
Dear Gui-Ye, Joost, i added your fixes to upstream (being myself the upstream dev) https://github.com/stef/liboprf/commit/8129a40faeda9c0457317c3a039c783d57dd4fb6 however i find it curious, that on riscv the test `ulimit -s 66000; ./tp-dkg-corrupt 3 2 ` segfaults, whil the other `ulimit -s

Bug#1077405: debian/upstream/signing-key.asc (was: Re: Bug #1077405: pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc missing?)

2024-08-08 Thread stef
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:24:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi again stef, > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, J

Bug#1077405: Bug #1077405: pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc missing?

2024-08-08 Thread stef
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi stef, > > I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a > pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not published on > https://github.com/stef/pysodium/releases either.) (You did s

Bug#1077405: Bug #1077405: pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc missing?

2024-08-08 Thread stef
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi stef, > > I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a > pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not published on pypi does not publish signatures anymore, i did sign it, but pypi ignores

Bug#1077405: bump to 0.7.18 hopefully that fixes this issue

2024-08-07 Thread stef
howdy, (pysodium upstream here) i just checked it, the culprit is, that back in the days i published 0.7.0 as 0.7.0-0 on pypi. none of the newer version have that -0 postfix, so any later version should be ok. of course the best would be the latest, 0.7.18.

Bug#1077405: bump to 0.7.18 hopefully that fixes this issue

2024-08-07 Thread stef
howdy, (pysodium upstream here) i'm a bit confused, 0.7.0 is packaged according to the build log, and it is called 0.7.0_0 - i have no idea where the _0 postfix comes from. nota bene pysodium is already are at 0.7.18 and according to https://pypi.debian.net/pysodium/ there is awareness of a newe

Bug#1059039: usrmerge: installing usrmerge on a chroot with /usr on a separate partition fails

2023-12-19 Thread stef
Package: usrmerge Version: 38 Severity: important howdy, trying to update a debian unstable system, and it breaks due to usrmerge. Preparing to unpack .../archives/usrmerge_38_all.deb ... /usr is a standalone filesystem, this requires using an initramfs. dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache

Bug#1036370: BUGG INSTALL DEBIAN V11.7.0

2023-05-19 Thread stef rexel
Package: V11.7.0 Boot method: RESEAU Image version: ONLINE Date: 20/05/2023 8H37 Machine: SIEMENS 6ES7647-8BD31-0CA1 (SIMATIC IPC227E (Nanobox PC); 1x display port; 2x 10/100/1000 Mbit/s Ethernet RJ45; 1 x USB3.0, 3 x USB2.0; CFast slot; 24 V DC industrial power supply Celeron N2930 (4C/4

Bug#920976: kdiff3: Some files could not be processed

2019-04-29 Thread Stef Coene
Hi, I have the same problem. It's easy to replicate. Make a /tmp/test1 and /tmp/test2 directory. Touch a file in both directories and run kdiff3 to compare both directories. You will get the error 'Opening /tmp/test1/test failed. No such file or directory.' Stef

Bug#843530: docker.io: docker broken: oci runtime error: could not synchronize with container process

2016-11-10 Thread Stef Walter
ithub.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/5340 Stef

Bug#843530: docker.io: docker broken: oci runtime error: could not synchronize with container process

2016-11-08 Thread Stef Walter
On 07.11.2016 16:44, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On 7 November 2016 at 05:34, Stef Walter wrote: >> The docker package is unfortunately currently broken. It fails to run >> containers and instead produces the following message: >> >> rpc error: code = 2 desc = "oci runt

Bug#843530: docker.io: docker broken: oci runtime error: could not synchronize with container process

2016-11-07 Thread Stef Walter
Package: docker.io Version: 1.11.2~ds1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The docker package is unfortunately currently broken. It fails to run containers and instead produces the following message: rpc error: code = 2 desc = "oci runtime error: could not synchronise with

Bug#760102: gnome keyring & gpg agent

2015-06-05 Thread Stef Walter
t;>> gpg-agent (e.g. those who don't have smartcards, don't use gpgsm, and >>> who otherwise ignore the concerns Werner has raised about >>> gnome-keyring's incomplete gpg-agent support) would be unable to do so. >>> >>> It's a more inva

Bug#751907: Re: Bug#751907: libffi6: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Permission denied

2014-09-10 Thread stef
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > > when using grsecurity/pax protections > > so nothing is broken for a default install. true. but the default install maybe also needs a bugreport for lack of grsec protection. ;) > > patch shou

Bug#728312: gnome-keyring RC bug – GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 711222

2014-09-01 Thread Stef Walter
On 16.08.2014 11:35, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Hey Stef!, > > As reported at GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 711222 [1] there are some serious > issues with gnome-keyring that have resulted in the package being > marked as unfit for release. As you seem to be the main contributor to > t

Bug#751907: patch possibly unrelated?

2014-06-17 Thread stef
i just downgraded libffi6:i386 3.1-2 -> 3.1~rc1+r3.0.13-12 and all seems to be working again. since the patch is against 3.0.12 i suppose it might not be the solution to this problem, will investigate further. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Bug#751907: libffi6: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Permission denied

2014-06-17 Thread stef
Package: libffi6 Version: 3.1-2 Severity: critical Tags: security patch Justification: breaks the whole system when using grsecurity/pax protections on debian unstable, the newest libffi6 breaks almost everything. some examples: > # emacs > emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.6

Bug#740429: fonts-crosextra-carlito: please backport fonts-crosextra-carlito and fonts-crosextra-caladea to wheezy-backports

2014-03-01 Thread Stef CT
Package: fonts-crosextra-carlito Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Would it be possible to backport fonts-crosextra-carlito and fonts-crosextra- caladea from jessie to wheezy-backports? Thanks StefCT -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500,

Bug#712893: dpkg-reconfigure locales: Add info about using space bar to toggle locales

2013-06-20 Thread Stef CT
Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.10 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, In dpkg-reconfigure locales the user can press the space bar to toggle the locale under the cursor. However, this info is not provided by the user interface. Personally I had a rather hard time figuring out how to select more than

Bug#703557: opensc: pls update to 0.13.0

2013-03-20 Thread stef
Package: opensc Version: 0.12.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream A new was released on 04.12.2012. thanks for packaging! -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.7.7-grsec (SMP w/2 CPU cores)

Bug#659521: bug confirmed on debian testing installation

2012-02-13 Thread stef schip
I confirm the bug on my laptop, equipped with AR9285 (module ath9k) wireless chip. the laptop (samsung N220 netbook) has a fairly clean debian testing installation, after kernel upgrade from 3.1.0-1-686-pae to 3.2.0-1-686-pae connection to a wifi router with WEP encryption (*) does not work anymor

Bug#651595: ANNOUNCE: p11-kit 0.9

2011-12-23 Thread Stef Walter
bug is no longer triggered on gcc 4.6.1 How does that sound? Acceptable? Cheers, Stef On 12/14/2011 07:08 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2011-12-14 Stef Walter wrote: >> On 2011-12-10 11:06, Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] >>> The minimal change I found was to just

Bug#629874: fusecompress: workaround

2011-09-25 Thread stef
Package: fusecompress Version: 2.6.4 Followup-For: Bug #629874 for those people, how find this via google, here's a workaround, even if the pkg is discontinued in debian: i have tracked down the problem to libboost_serialization1. if i compile with 1.42 (or install from snapshot.debian.org i'm ab

Bug#629874: Unable to open files created with older version

2011-07-21 Thread stef
Package: fusecompress Version: 2.6.git913897f4-1 Followup-For: Bug #629874 when accessing files on a mounted fusecompress volume, syslog is splattered with: FuseCompress: int Compress::open(const char*, int): Failed to restore LayerMap of file 'testfile:2,RS', exception: requested integer size e

Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-10-07 Thread stef louise
Right here is the diagnostic of why it fails: Compiled the stuff with CFLAGS=-g to trace the execution. Here is my diagnostic: run -B . -N locale -E UTF-8 -Epathname 1:1 -Emisc 1:1 -norc -m 2MW -lp -x '(and (load "init.lisp") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)' Starting program: /hom

Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-10-01 Thread stef louise
triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: clisp # Any idea? Something to try in order to help? 2010/9/27 Peter Van Eynde : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello Stef, > > On 22/09/10 21:53, stef louise wrote: >> I may have some tim

Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-09-22 Thread stef louise
Stéphane 2010/9/17 Peter Van Eynde : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello Stef, > > On 16/09/10 21:57, stef louise wrote: >> /usr/share/common-lisp/source/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller.lisp >> *** - handle_fault error2 ! add

Bug#592768: Fwd: Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-09-16 Thread stef louise
debugging to identify where > precisely this script fails? > > [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] > Never abandon a theory that explains something until you have a theory that > explains more.  — John McCarthy > > > > On 16 Sept

Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-09-16 Thread stef louise
Hi, This bug seems quite quiet for a grave bug (the update manager refuse to work since then). I tried to use dpkg which seems to give more accurate messages for common-lisp installation: # LANG=C dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/common-lisp-controller_7.4_all.deb (Reading database ... 196004 file

Bug#550662: Info received (Also on Mac mini / PowerPC)

2010-03-26 Thread stef louise
OK, Sorry: bad copy of bug number... :/ I wanted to address bug #550562 You can erase my previous message. Sorry again and thank you. Stéphane

Bug#550662: Also on Mac mini / PowerPC

2010-03-21 Thread stef louise
Hi, I am a mostly happy owner of (among others) a last model of the Mac Mini - PowerPC edition. These beasts came with a G4 MPC 7447a at 1.5GHz and a AGP Radeon 7250 (R280). I experienced the bug about the same time as Jean-Luc, it got better a little while, but really soon it was deadly again : n

Bug#542858: Additionnal information about the trace

2009-08-30 Thread stef louise
OK, sorry about that. I tried to disassemble the code and follow it a little, but one thing is clear : the level at which the blocking occurs is not the deepest one. It is too tricky for me to follow at assembly level though, as I am not yet fluent in PPC assembly. Moreover, each time I interrupt t

Bug#542858: Confirming this bug on PowerPC

2009-08-28 Thread stef louise
Hi, I can confirm this bug on PowerPC. When trying to play a song, the processor use raise to 100% and Rhythmbox stalls. It looks like the usual "let's assume all char on every plateform are signed char and let's do loops carelessfully" kind of bug, but I may be wrong. I tried to make a backtrack

Bug#272627: Hiliary was happy with her result

2008-03-30 Thread STEF Koster
Get better action from her every night Make your rod stronger and more powerful than ever http://www.bejuiela.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#408327: RFP: funionfs -- An Overlay or Union filesystem for FUSE

2007-01-24 Thread stef
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: funionfs Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Stephane APIOU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://funionfs.apiou.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : An Overlay or Union filesystem for FUSE

Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

2006-04-12 Thread Stef VK5HSX
tter stands for). > > So, I would also second "Amateur radio"... I too feel "Amateur Radio" Would be the preferred Menu item.. rather than "Ham". -- Regards - Stef VK5HSX Adelaide, Sth Australia -= Use Open Source Software =-

Bug#246288: Getting a very similar segfault here

2005-01-19 Thread Stef Epardaud
Hi. I could not run that program due to a segfault in the call to getgrouplist. After googling a little, I changed the 'compat' settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf to 'files nis' and all went well. Now dbus is up and running (and I gotta figure out how to make it do what I want, but that's anothing thi

Bug#246288: Getting a very similar segfault here

2005-01-16 Thread Stef Epardaud
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 07:03:30PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > The socket opening stuff is something your nisbindings do, not a dbus thing. > Could you trace the daemon with ltrace and provide the last part of the > output. Ok, thanks for the quick reply, here goes: memmove(0x809bc9d, 0x809bc9

Bug#246288: Getting a very similar segfault here

2005-01-16 Thread Stef Epardaud
Hi, I'm getting a segfault too, rendering dbus useless. Any time a client connects to it, it segfaults. I didn't manage to get a core dump even when starting it myself with 'ulimit -c unlimited'. However I've got some info. When I run the command DBUS_VERBOSE=1 dbus-daemon-1 --system --nofork I