Package: libglib2.0-0
Version: 2.56.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop, via
aptitude
and included in that upgrade to satisfy dependencies was libglib-2.0-0.
Since installing, many many
That's what this ticket pertains to- I did remove the package. It removed.
After removing it, it will not reinstall. There is no debian prompt that
occurs:
steam flatly refuses to install.
on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 13:47:02 -0400 Michael Gilbert wrote:
> You'll need to remove the package, then reinst
unlike me was attempting
to manually set the debconf variable. I simply installed, uninstalled,
and attempted to reinstall again.):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757524
Thank you for your consideration.
-rektide
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers tes
Package: findutils
Version: 4.5.12-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I would really like to be able to pipe into xargs and have it start and
interactive program. It cannot.
Please give us a feature which will let us:
ls|xargs [option flag here] vim
without error.
I do not want to have an x
A great idea. (cross-)Toolchaining and (cross-)image building are just two
places without a good home that would be happy to have this ML.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: zookeeper
Severity: minor
Hello Dear Maintainer,
I'd love for zkfuse to be packaged, either in the zookeeper package or as a
separate package.
It'd be very handy to have when trying to look into zookeeper instances.
Thanks,
rektide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Package: multistrap
Version: 2.1.20
Severity: normal
Hi. I'm trying to multistrap a systemd system, but mutlistrap pulls in sysvinit
and I see no way to detour or help coach multistrap around this conflict.
Thanks for any help resolving this.
-- Configuration excerpt:
[Debian]
packages=apt ifu
Package: pdebuild-cross
Version: 2.2.19
Severity: wishlist
Hiya. I would like very much to be able to specify an alternate configuration
file for pdebuild-cross. I'm using it to build a number of
different multistrap configurations, and it's an aggravation having only a
single /etc/pdebuild-cros
any workarounds for this? have been disabling samba, would like it back some
time. :/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.
Regards,
rektide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The following version dependencies are from the machine encountering this issue:
Versions of packages python-egenix-mxdatetime depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii python2.5.4-9An interactive high-level object-o
ii
And, problem solved. python-egenix-mxtools was behind, updating to 3.1.3-2 got
python-egenix-mxdatetime working in python2.6. Close please.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: python-egenix-mxdatetime
Version: 3.1.3-2
Severity: important
python-egenix-mxdatetime should provide an mx.DateTime package. it appears to
not be getting installed correctly,
as python2.6 cannot find it. python2.5 runs fine.
first a find, showing files matching patterns that pytho
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.9-3
Severity: important
Attempting to use a physical-logical map to bring up a wpa-roam interface
fails. The following record details the "ifup" I am attempting, and shows its
failure. Note that the actual ifup command succeeds, but wpa_action fails its
fo
Package: xl2tpd
Version: 1.2.4+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
No support for kernel L2TP aka CONFIG_PPPOL2TP compiled in,
which could greatly reduce userland load by shuffling most
processing into the kernel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable
I too am getting this error, as per Slaven's report. reinstalling did not
alter the
results.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to aid diagnosis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.4.1~dfsg-8.1
Severity: normal
Starting snmpd causes a somewhat hairy message:
netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
netsnmp_subtree_load()
I havent root cause on why or what is happening, but there is an official patch
to fix the issue
ia32-sun-java6-bin "mostly" works for me. I've been developing in Eclipse
and running tomcat webapps for two-three months, but the DNS issue has
finally gotten me so irked I decided to investigate where the problem was.
This DNS resolve issue is the only glitch I've experienced in that time.
I'm
Package: ia32-sun-java6-bin
Version: 6-06-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cannot resolve domain names. Resolve fine on the rest of the system, have not
tested with other JDK's. Installed from package and set with
update-java-alternatives.
DNS works for everything el
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
Severity: normal
The "see also" at the end of manpage for xorg.conf references mouse(4) but
should be mousedrv(4), as xserver-xorg-input-mouse has a
mousedrv(4) manpage and not a mouse(4) manpage. mouse(4) is a manpage from the
Linux Programm
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:51:12PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
The latest series have all been working fine, thanks. Suspend to ram too, haza!
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding some lockups when using the ATI driver of Xorg 6.9 on a Rade
Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Monodoc-browser crashes mono, spewing thusly:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08717c88 ***
I'm using up to date mono packages from unstable, and I've had this bug
for three or four
Package: xserver-xorg
Followup-For: Bug #345729
Whats up with this bug? I'm still holding on xserver-xorg 6.8.2-10 forfear of
my systems' life. Id like to go to 7.0, but its been two months since I've
heard anything from this. I've had some 'accidents' already that've left
me stranded without
23 matches
Mail list logo
