On Dec 28, 2016 6:21 AM, "James Clarke" wrote:
> Package: gcc-6
> Version: 6.2.1-7
> Severity: important
>
> The check introduced to ignore dpkg's PIE specs when PIE is not enabled
> by default is wrong, and ends up ignoring them even when hardening=+all
> or hardening=+pie is present in DEB_BUIL
Package: hannah-foo2zjs
Version: 1:2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I would submit a patch if I knew how. I'll study some more and try to do that
later.
* What led up to the situation?
When trying to download firmware for my printer (HP1020), I noticed that the
software reported that it w
es freerdp FTBFS due to
> newly added symbols.
>
> What do you suggest? Lowering -c4 to -c3 to ignore the symbols change?
> Adjusting the patch to flag the recently added functions as static?
I think changing the patch is the way to go.
--
Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:42, Joey Hess wrote:
> Looking at the lack of any explanation attached to #659208,
> I am very tempted to revert it. CCing Otavio since he seemed to find
> some value in that bug that I don't see.
Agreed in reverting it for now.
> Also, why was #65920
ooking for a "not-too-bloated"
> environment and therefore could maybe deal with a text-based package
> manager).
>
> Before adding this, I'd like to get comments from other tasksel
> maintainers (that would be Otavio and/or Joey).
I agree as well; I see the tasks as
yslog of the installation so we can try to figure
which one depends on it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
ike to ask you to separate those changes.
The bsd support seems fine and I liked the linux refatory but would like to
get some feedback from Colin on this one. To we advance faster on this,
please prepare one patch with only the bsd changes so we can merge it until
the refactory is under re
r code (1)
>
This bug has been fixed in 1.0.0-2 version.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
BS changes he made though.
I'd prefer to not move to cdbs but except from it, I am OK with the changes
done.
If you can look at other changes he has proposed and import what you think
is OK (I didn't check the .pc changes you referred to) I am OK in review
and upload it to
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:28, Prema wrote:
> In the Debian Weekly build image of 02-Jan-2012 , the "Install Graphical"
> option does boot in a graphical mode. But it is not detecting the keyboard
> and mouse.,so no way to get the error log also.
>
What is your keybo
r-friendly (and it is, for my
type of use, but not for general use).
I do think you ought to stop to try to push your personal opinion too
hard... it is clear on this thread that most people do not agree with you
so lets go ahead and move topic.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:01, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:39:17PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > The installer image above is an old image from January. Otavio: we
> > > should either ask ftp-master to remove that old 20110106+b1 build
> >
running installation, just after setting time zone, the
>> installer try to detect hardware and stop with mess "Error while
>> running 'modprobe -v usb-storage'".
>
> The installer image above is an old image from January. Otavio: we
> should either a
take over the
package.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Hello Max,
Did you have time to look at the new release of klibc?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
d from *squeeze*, not
> sarge as you said to start with, I'm guessing a simple mistake on your
> part when typing that! :-)
>
> It's also a mini netboot image which is the domain of the debian-boot
> team. Forwarding there for comment...
There's no release of installe
on that so if you're able to help with doing
the packaging changes Daniel or I can review and upload it to
experimental for you.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 h
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
...
> suggesting #debian-boot there is probably not a good idea indeed.
> Anybody against the change?
I support the change.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
for tests to avoid them.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
immediaely.
>
> With a 6.0.2.1 amd64 netinstall CD, things are just fine.
...
It does seem to be a kernel issue so I reassigned it according.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
0.9.8)
It seems that fixing the RC bug, in the isdnutils case, was the
missing thing and now seems OK. So now it turns into the normal
transition window as this blocker has been fixed.
Have I missed anything?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossys
0
> and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries
> are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug
> report.
No problem from our POV.
--
Otavio Salvador
on it. If you want, take it over.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
g Weekly build? So we can know if the kernel
has fix this issue or we reassign it to linux-2.6 if it keep not
working.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.
E
> menus.
> I initially tried to install via GUI but when presented with the interface,
> the
> text was not shown.
> All I saw were square boxes where text should be.
...
Samuel,
Are you able to reproduce it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail:
rated on DVD-1 weekly image. I'm doing it every
> week under VirtualBox. The saved logs (from integrated WEB server) are
> attached.
>From the syslog it seems to be a bug we fixed during Debconf11. Do you
mind to test using latest weekly builds?
--
Otavio Salvador
9 this always appears to exist.
Ian, do you mind to have a look at this?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
e stage
I think I got it working but would be nice if you could test it since
I am having trouble with KVM in my laptop at this moment.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:22, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I indeed don't see anything in the script which copies devices.tar.gz to
> the target.
How I can reproduce the issue?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossys
meanwhile, it fails at the device creation step in the second stage:
>
> E: no /debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. cannot create devices
>
> This is indeed missing.
Did you use the git source? this changed second_stage.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-m
fine.
It does seem to be an issue with cowbuilder. Reassigning according.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> doesn't work. Only manually doing: mount -tvfat /dev/sdb /cdrom will let
> the installation to continue.
> ...
We uploaded iso-scan (1.36) with a fix that might solve this issue. Please
give a try using tomorrow's daily.
--
Otavio Salvador O
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:04, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> ...
>
Attached copy of /var/log/syslog
>
It seems that it fails to unmount the DVD (I don't know why) but would be
nice if you could try to reproduce it again and pay attation to any detail
that might help us to reproduce i
o handle it (but couldn't test it locally); please check
if tomorrow's daily works for you.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
esting to have it fixed for next point release.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
libnl3 is already available and wpa-supplicant has support for
it AFAIK so it seems better to get the patch integrated on it to avoid
redoing it later. wpa-supplicant also needs to update to use this but seems
worth it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossys
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 20:51, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please consider this patch to add support for ZFS volumes in humandev().
>
Commited but I setted the sublevel to 5 for now. Christian please see if you
agree with it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mai
gt; It would be very handy if at least the vmxnet3 and vmw_pvscsi modules
> were enabled by default in the businesscard/netinstaller ISO files.
> ...
I am reassigning the bug to kernel-wedge since this is where it needs to be
fixed and I will deal with it for next kernel upload.
the kernel module is hid_logitech.
>
This is included on current installer so please could you try with last
dailies to see if you can reproduce it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 998
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Version: daily-image-20110725
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
This bug is intended to be leave open until the development of the
scripts need to warn users that an specific image is not working are
being done.
Please don't close this bug if you're not involved on this act
onment, though I might have not considered all
> use cases.
Can you port your patch to the current version of choose-mirror? the patch
doesn't apply in current git version.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossyst
Hello Michael,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:20, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > By default the building system gets the udebs from unstable. This is
> > configurated on debian/rules using the building system variable (that
> &
e seen at:
debootstrap (1.0.21) unstable; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Apply patch from Clint Adams to add support for
gz/bz2/xz data.tar (closes: #458663).
...
-- Otavio Salvador Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:11:06 -0300
About the use of xz I see no reason to use for base packages as it
has
ebsd-*)
> in_target mount -t devfs devfs /dev ;;
>
> looks like it should work...
>
> There is /dev/sda5, formatted as ext2 mounted as /mnt/temp.
It shouldn't since it tried to run a kfreebsd binary in your Linux
host. Aurelien, can you take a look at it?
--
Otav
tag 545933 moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
Please provide the output of lsusb with the keyboard connected so we
can identify the required kernel module for inclusion.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:14, Guido Günther wrote:
> I can confirm this with the images from today (16-Jul-2011). The
> installer looks in dists/stable but the iso has dists/testing.
I downloaded and tested an image yestarday and failed to reproduce it;
mind to give it a new try?
--
ries after that.
Very nice addition :-) this will make life much easier for development
as well so you can use it to monitor a virtual machine and so on.
Nice!
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mo
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 16:45, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Does NOT work ANY MORE:
Now I have got it working again I think; it was a quoting issue.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 15:50, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> 2011/7/23 Otavio Salvador
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 15:09, yannubu...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>> >> I maked a fake environment and tested this patch locally and it seems
>> >> to
sudo os-prober
> /dev/sda1:::chain
> /dev/sda5:Ubuntu 10.10 (10.10):Ubuntu:linux
So now it has detected it but failed to handle description; the
attached patch ought to fix it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystem
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 14:10, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Opa!
I maked a fake environment and tested this patch locally and it seems
to work. Please give it a try and tell me.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br h
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:50, Bastian Blank wrote:
> It is enabled and according to
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/linux-image-2.6.39-2-s390x/filelist
> correctly included. Please show more evidence.
Missing on tape flavour.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:11, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>> I attached a new one and this is more verbose. Please test it.
>
> Bom dia Otavio
Bom dia! :-)
Well, I did a quite stupid mistake in last patch so I am attaching the
fixed one. I hope it works now.
-
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 18:02, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> 2nd patch does not work either:
I attached a new one and this is more verbose. Please test it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55
Hello,
I did a try to reproduce this today and I couldn't reproduce it. It
worked fine for me. Can you please give it a try using a new image?
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53
reopen 632970
thanks
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 17:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
Sorry; typed the wrong bug number. Just reopened it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 17:05, yannubu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Thanks Otavio.
> Unfortunately, your patch does not solve the bug. Please see below the
> os-prober output I get in 3 configurations:
Good; please revert previous patch and try this one.
--
Otavio
to apply this patch and test it again?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
diff --git a/os-probes/mounted/x86/20microsoft b/os-probes/mounted/x
ork.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Currently there're a development of partman-nbd for integration into
Debian Installer and we started pushing the required changes to
integrate it. Regarding kernel support, s390 is the only missing
architecture.
This bug is more a
ge.
> I wasn't able to install debian 6 using netinst image and USB stick.
Please run the installer from USB stick and when it hangs, copy the
/var/log/syslog into the pendrive or another one so we can have a clue
about where and why it hangs.
TIA,
--
Otavio Salvador
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 19:39, Hartmut Goebel
wrote:
> Am 16.05.2011 14:07, schrieb Otavio Salvador:
>> Is it something going to be put onto Debian itself? If not, it would
>> be better to it to be done while customizing Debian for the project
>> specially because it won'
self? If not, it would
be better to it to be done while customizing Debian for the project
specially because it won't be the only change most probably.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 23:54, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 21:17, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Now that the various bootloaders have hooks to handle kernel
>> installation, or otherwise automatically handle all kernels via their
>> actual paths, do_symlinks d
o "no".
Commited. It is now pending for next upload of base-installer.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 20:38, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 06:47:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 21:38, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > I just installed Debian on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220, starting from the
>> > Debian stable
in the USB3 port. It booted successfully, but the
> booted system could not see the drive, so it could not load the rest of
> the installer components.
Can you try with a daily build?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://ww
ou elaborate a bit what is your planned usage of it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..
...
It seems it was a mirroring issue. Is it still reproducable?
It there a reason to not use our stable release? (squeeze currently)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 02:32, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> So, this is not a bug, then?
IMO we could close this bug report in this case. Others?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7
#x27;t block the removal from sid of palo.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
mber doing this...hence the cloned bug report).
>
> This is indeed why "checksum" was fine by me.
>
> Otavio?
preseed-md5 seems good to me.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +5
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 13:38, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 02:19, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> > Without objections, I'll add this ASAP.
>>
>> I'd say to use preseed-checksum sin
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 02:19, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Without objections, I'll add this ASAP.
I'd say to use preseed-checksum since checksum mens nothing and might
be confusing.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems
d someone from Alpha team to take care of d-i for it; if someone
does it we can build it again. Until someone joins the effort I think
it won't be done.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +5
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:42, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Here it goes another patch to blacklist the modules you pointed.
> If it's OK i can commit it.
Seems safe to me. Please commit it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.c
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 22:33, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:08:01 -0500 (EST), Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> In case you have any problem with GIT I can help you with it.
>> I suggest you to read:
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/
ok on Joey comment about it not being support in case it has
backup disabled. It needs to support both behaviours.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:18, Risto Suominen wrote:
> It's probably because of the frame buffer problem that's been
> discussed in bug #614221.
>
> As a workaround, try: install video=ofonly.
If this works, we ought to merge those bug reports right
ng (with different usage), and it's
>> already enabled in busybox.
>
> No, getopts can't deal with long options, which Kickstart requires.
What is the binary size change enabling it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br htt
worked fine though, but I didn't
> get as far as grub because sdhci-pci is still missing.
This is going to be fixed for 6.0.1.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-78
ems with some broken mirrors. So it
really needs a good way of checking to be used by default.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 20:53, Joey Hess wrote:
...
> I'm tempted to revert that part of 80bed2cd86b0b31e4d36525d5357ceb7abc1b80f.
...
Seems right to revert it. If it is being preseeded then it is
responsability of the preseeder (*grin*) to be aware of the error
being hidden.
--
Done. Uploaded to sid.
Please give it a try in a days.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 13:05, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
>> if pidof X > /dev/null; then
>> echo "X is running"
>> else
>> echo "X isn't running"
>> fi
>
> Er
ing simple as:
if pidof X > /dev/null; then
echo "X is running"
else
echo "X isn't running"
fi
?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
g file only.
I will handle it on debian-cd.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:14, Paul Rufos wrote:
> 2011/2/17 Otavio Salvador
>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:45, Paul Rufous wrote:
>> > + http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612809
>> > Please add depends ``btrfs-tools'' if btrfs wa
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:45, Paul Rufous wrote:
> + http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612809
> Please add depends ``btrfs-tools'' if btrfs was choose as partotion
> filesystem.
Checking partman-btrfs it seems doing that. Have you tested it with
squeeze ins
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:10, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:44, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> ...
>> I'll do this, which will avoid triggerring the problem. However, of
>> course, the underlying problem is still here..:-)
>
> Joey has commited,
an be added on 6.0.1 if proves
safe.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian
t to make more regular uploads but not sure if
automated in any specific frequency will give any benefit for us. Live
and others can use dailies but fetch them from a different URL.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossyste
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:30, Hector Oron wrote:
>> You mean like fake uploads?
>
> No, I mean full debian-installer builds to happen in the buildds
> instead of cron tasks in other servers.
Right but in daily basis? it seems too frequent for me.
--
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 19:52, Hector Oron wrote:
...
> It would be useful if debian-installer images are built through Debian
> buildd infrastructure instead having to setup build daemons on random sites.
> It might be a nice goal for next release.
You mean like fake uploads?
-
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 13:36, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 11, 15:45:46, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I just uploaded it. So tomorrow you should have it on dailies.
>> >
>> > I see #558036 is marked pending and I can test that at the sa
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 13:37, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 11, 11:52:07, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think I fixed it in grub-installer. Untested thought.
>> >
>> > Can I test this with a recent enough daily image or is it more
&
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:41, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Otavio, Colin, any objection to this?
>
> (cc'ed to get attention, just in case...sorry for the double mail)
Sure not. Seems logical do this move ASAP.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Syste
is is really annoying,
FreeRDP on testing ought to be working for for you. Please give it a try.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To
a kernel bug. Even with the quiet option the kernel
> should not suppress messages the user absolutely needs to see to be
> able to proceed. Also AFAIUI this issue is not d-i specific.
Yes. I agree that this is a kernel issue.
Reassigning according.
--
Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:26, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> XSane is complex to use and simple-scan will do for the vast majority of
> desktop users.
Dropped xsane from gnome-desktop for next upload.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
1 - 100 of 1173 matches
Mail list logo
