Bug#755006: Acknowledgement (Avoiding gender-specific language)

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Please, consider this invalid. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. On 16/07/14 20:30, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is bei

Bug#755004: Acknowledgement (Avoiding gender-specific language)

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Please, consider this invalid. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. On 16/07/14 20:30, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is bei

Bug#755002: Acknowledgement (Avoiding gender-specific language)

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Please, consider this invalid. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. On 16/07/14 20:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is bei

Bug#754995: Acknowledgement (Avoiding gender-specific language)

2014-07-16 Thread myr
I spotted those mistake under ddp/manuals/tags/developers-reference but I did not know that withing the tags folder only _old_ versions are stored. Since this is the case, please consider also this report to be closed because it only refers to an old version of the documentation. Apologies for an

Bug#755006: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Subject: Avoiding gender-specific language Package: users-guide Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation

Bug#755005: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Subject: Avoiding gender-specific language Package: user Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation that i

Bug#755004: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Subject: Avoiding gender-specific language Package: java-faq Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation th

Bug#755003: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Subject: Avoiding gender-specific language Package: securing-howto Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentat

Bug#755002: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Subject: Avoiding gender-specific language Package: java-faq Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation th

Bug#755001: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Package: euro-support Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation that is part of DDP * What exactly di

Bug#754995: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-16 Thread myr
Package: developers-reference Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the documentation that is part of DDP * What ex

Bug#754740: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-14 Thread myr
Hi Justin, thanks a million and apologies for the mistakes. Please, find attached a new patch where all your suggestions have been applied. I also analyzed (using grep) all the other files in the same directory for gender-specific language and corrected some other occurrences. Among them, there's

Bug#754740: Avoiding gender-specific language

2014-07-14 Thread myr
Hi David and Justin, thanks a million for your valuable input! On 14/07/14 15:26, Justin B Rye wrote: > David Prévot wrote: >> I’m no native English, but believe using singular they would be more I took your advice and used the plural "they" for "users" in the patch attached here. > case above

Bug#754740: patch

2014-07-13 Thread myr
Package: debian-faq Version: 5.0.1 Severity: minor Please, find a patch attached. Thanks, Myriam -- Contact me securely at iam...@my-ambrosia.com Download my public key from http://www.my-ambrosia.com/pgp Index: pkg_basics.sgml ==

Bug#754741: debian-faq : unnecessarily gender-specific language

2014-07-13 Thread myr
Package: debian-faq Version: 5.0.1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? found reference to 'user' as 'he' rather than 'he/she' in http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq/pkg_b

Bug#754740: debian-faq : unnecessarily gender-specific language

2014-07-13 Thread myr
Package: debian-faq Version: 5.0.1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? found reference to 'user' as 'he' rather than 'he/she' in http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq/pkgto