Bug#940814: gitlab: fails to install due to wrong ruby-asciidoctor version

2019-09-20 Thread msa
Package: gitlab Version: 11.8.10+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, this bug affects the unstable as well as the experimental package. It was originally encountered on a (fresh) libvirt+qemu instance of debian but I decided to try to reproduce it on the official docker image (which is w

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-25 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
+31-20-592 5102 1098 XG Amsterdam Fax +31-20-592 5155 The Netherlands Email msa...@nikhef.nl __ .. ... _._. ._ ... ._ ._.. ._.. .._.. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4602 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-25 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
Mischa -- Nikhef Room H155 Science Park 105Tel. +31-20-592 5102 1098 XG Amsterdam Fax +31-20-592 5155 The Netherlands Email msa...@nikhef.nl __ .. ... _._. ._ ... ._ ._.. ._.. .._.. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Tick

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-25 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
5155 The Netherlands Email msa...@nikhef.nl __ .. ... _._. ._ ... ._ ._.. ._.. .._.. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4602 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-25 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
p://www.nikhef.nl/~janjust/proxy-verify/ > > line 346, but I'm not sure that's necessary. > > > Mischa > > > > > > > > Those functions are already present in pre-1.1 OpenSSL (at least in > > > the 1.0.2 > > > series) > > >

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-25 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
sure that's necessary. Mischa > > Those functions are already present in pre-1.1 OpenSSL (at least in the 1.0.2 > series) > > On Fri Jul 22 15:51:16 2016, msa...@nikhef.nl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > unless I didn't look careful enough I think we might sti

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-22 Thread msa...@nikhef.nl via RT
sion is different in the sense that they usually put the proxyPolicy before the proxyPathlength (when finite, i.e. present) inside the extension, but RFC-style extensions also occur. In openssl.cnf style a GT3 extension would be something like this: [ g