Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.8-2
Severity: minor
--- - 2007-05-26 11:13:54.205739000 -0400
+++ /tmp/postconf.5 2007-05-26 11:12:33.0 -0400
@@ -4647,7 +4647,7 @@
are separated by whitespace, commas or colons. In the policy table
(see smtp_tls_policy_maps) the only valid separator i
Package: manpages,groff
Version: 1.18.1.1-12
I would like to resolve at least one inconsistency regarding preferred
manpage formatting practices. Quoting .SH arguments; see Debian
#368996. manpages man.7 and groff_man.7 have different advice about
whether .SH arguments with spaces should be quot
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:14:30AM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 07:42:52PM +0200, Lars Steinke wrote:
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > I have not been approached concerning takeover of maintainership for
> > tktable and neither have I found any new patches attached to the bugs
> > filed f
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:55:27AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Ven 30 Septembre 2005 04:32, Justin Pryzby a ?crit :
> > #define ({ ...; x; )} is a gcc extension.
>
> and ? I'm not sure to understand what you mean/want ...
That's probably why vim doesn't know about it. Its more like a
wishl
I had this problem on 2/3 machines I upgraded today. The upgrade that
worked was from 0.076-6; the other two were from 0.081-1. I donno if
thats relevant. The latest upgrade was also from a "held" state after
dist-upgrading everything else (except firefox), and the
already-running udev on that s
>Number: 2170
>Notify-List:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: delay after wrong key in confirmation prompt for server
>certificate
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
reopen 345113
thanks
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:07:44PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 2005-12-28 Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Upgrading from 4.0.24-10sarge1 to 5.0.16-1 I got a large number of
> > unnecessary conffile prompts. I'm including a tarball of the files
> > that caused pro
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:51:12PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> severity 331688 minor
> thanks
Modifying conffiles (effectively what seems to have happened here)
violates policy 10.7.4:
The maintainer scripts must not alter a `conffile' of _any_
package, including the one the scr
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote ..
> Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:36:18 +0200
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line Bug#321166: Strange error (bash: ELF: command not found)
> while trying "source file"
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
> sourc
Package: gnuplot
Severity: normal
Version: 4.0.0-2
Plot the included data file. The INDEF values appear as linearly
increasing. This is confusing, because I'm in the midst of trying to
analyze a new dataset, and one of the files (for one reason or
another) is full of INDEF y-values. So, the dat
Package: tetex-bin
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.2-30
File: /usr/bin/pdftosrc
Missing manpage for /usr/bin/pdftosrc.
I take it this is not a piece of software that magically decompiles a
PDF document into whatever source document was used to create it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 05:33:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Could you comment on bug #294655? I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> > ./debian/rules, which unexpectedly caused `dh_testroot`==1
> > (because /usr/bin/fakeroot just sets LD_PRELOAD=libfakeroot.so.0
> > and LD_LIBRARY_PA
12 matches
Mail list logo
