Sorry i meant "Why not".
On 31 January 2010 14:26, db wrote:
> Why use sysctl and kernel.sysrq to disable this ability ?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Why use sysctl and kernel.sysrq to disable this ability ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This bug still occurs for me :)
Doing echo "test" > test.php
and then
"
for f in `seq 0 100`; do php test.php; done
"
While i have hyper threading on (this is a pentium 4 box), i get get
Segmentation fault every now and again.
If i do echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online ...the
Segment
Sorry i meant to reply to bug 493045. Please ignore my previous reply.
2009/10/24 db :
> This bug still occurs for me :)
> Doing echo "test" > test.php
> and then
> "
> for f in `seq 0 100`; do php test.php; done
> "
>
> While i have hyper th
This bug still occurs for me :)
Doing echo "test" > test.php
and then
"
for f in `seq 0 100`; do php test.php; done
"
While i have hyper threading on (this is a pentium 4 box), i get get
Segmentation fault every now and again.
If i do echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online ...the
Segment
The issue was that reportbug did not seem to be working at the time i
reported those two pidgin bugs (which were actually the same bug ->
one was wrongly rated the other probably higher than it should have
been).
Both were actually mistakes.
Thank you.
2009/8/26 Debian Bug Tracking System :
>
When i had filled it i was not aware that 2.5.9 was in debian sid at the time.
I also was not sure if reportbug was actually working.
2009/8/23 Debian Bug Tracking System :
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the pidgin package:
>
> #543170: pidg
lsmod shows the module is loaded.
I am still experiencing this bug. Perhaps it is a limitation of having
a bios password. I will test it again, with the bios password
disabled.
2009/5/17 Michael Biebl :
> david b. wrote:
>> Package: hal
>> Version: 0.5.11-8
>> Severity: important
>>
>> My laptop a
The bug is not really that the program doesn't run, the bug is that
MAXPATHLEN is not defined with a valid value. Please see the urls previously
provided for more information...In addition,to the much better description
provided by Robert Scheck at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309
Oh i forgot to add that the The smb.conf man page says the following
regarding case sensitivity;
" case sensitive = yes/no/auto
controls whether filenames are case sensitive. If they aren´t,
default setting of auto allows clients that support case
sensitive
access
Ah ext3 is case sensitive it is not a wish list feature because real
data can be lost without a warning. By default samba (is not exporting
shares that are case sensitive apparently) and nautilus does not prompt the
user leading to data loss. Perhaps the default configuration for samba
should
Package: nautilus
Version: 2.20.0-7
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi I found a bug on ubuntu launchpad and reproduced it is (the bug)
currently in debian lenny and is filed upstream (i filled it upstream).
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564563
Here is a
Hello,
the bug is related to syntax change of smbpasswd: starting from samba version
3.0.8 it no longer accepts password on command line, like kcmsamba seems to
call it when adding new user or changing user password.
A quick and dirty workaround could be:
dpkg-divert --add --rename --divert /u
Based on Reinhard's uploaded files i have created binary packages on an
nslu2 running debian etch. I do not know if somebody is interested or not,
but i would like to contribute to the project as i want to use boxbackup
on nslu2.
-db
14 matches
Mail list logo
