Hi Vitaliy,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:07:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 12:25:15 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:57:34 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > >
> > > According to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.c
Hi Vitaliy, Daniel
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:05:08 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > Vitaliy wrote:
> > > Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Can you
> > > check attached patch? ( do not tu
gt; + read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> sk->sk_write_space(sk);
> read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
--
-- Tom Rathborne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Vitaliy,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:21:45PM +0400, Vitaily Gusev wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:57:43 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
>
> I will send you the sysrq-D info next time I get the bug!
Oops ... now OpenVZ won't start!
magrathea:~# vzctl start 101
Starting VE ..
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:03:21PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:51:02PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > 2. We need sysrq-D info after lockup, so try to compile kernel without
> > CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS.
>
> With this week's new Debian lenny ke
COUNTERS! I will look at this again later this
week and see if I can figure out how to exclude just those patches.
I'll let you know how it goes ... thanks for your attention! :)
Tom
--
-- Tom Rathborne
Tommer needs a revision that takes care of itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
NFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
Ok ... built and running ... but ... now I'm not getting the spinlock
problem at all! Oh no, Heisenbug!!! :-/
I will keep thrashing the machine and send you a sysrq-{p,t,w,d}
report if I hit the bug.
Tom
--
-- Tom Rathborne
Tommer needs a revision that takes care of
Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:58:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Saturday 07 March 2009 12:13:14 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > Hi Vitaliy,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:04:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > Tom wrote:
> > > > Is ther
Hi Vitaliy ...
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:02:04AM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > &g
Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > It is very strange bug.
> >
> > It sure is!
> >
>
tc.
Thanks,
Tom
--
-- Tom Rathborne
Tommer needs a revision that takes care of itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/0x5d
[3594580.540453] [] system_call_after_swapgs+0x8a/0x8f
I would be happy to provide any other information, but I'm not sure what would
be useful at this point!
Regards,
Tom
--
-- Tom Rathborne
Tommer needs a revision that takes care of itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
13 matches
Mail list logo
