Am 14.03.2014 um 10:54 schrieb Klaus Ethgen :
> > In a nutshell, if you want CACert to be re-added you must prove
> > CACert and its infrastructure is trustworthy.
> > Something CACert has attempted but even their internal audits have failed.
>
> Well, CAcert is not more or less trustworth as e
Am 13.03.2014 um 17:21 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer :
> I doubt that the removal of CAcert was a good decision…
I wish you would have read the whole the bug report, especially the history
of how the CACert root certificate came into ca-certificates.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Am 16.09.2013 um 11:46 schrieb "Thijs Kinkhorst" :
> On Sun, September 15, 2013 01:16, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
>> But I just found one request that was official (msg #20), Venzuela's
>> Suscerte
>> and I also see that in #37 you've referred them to M
c16
ciao, tom
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309564#129
Am 14.09.2013 um 23:41 schrieb Michael Shuler :
> On 09/14/2013 12:15 PM, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
>
> <..lots!..>
>
> I appreciate you adding some good details and your thoughts to this bu
Hi,
I recently had to read into CACert, wether they are a good
and practical thing to use for https ssl certificates,
with browers red warning messages and what not.
During my research I just stumbled across this bugreport
and like to contribute my ¢2.1
I don't think the other discussion on -lega
5 matches
Mail list logo
