Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups

2025-07-19 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:18:54AM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: > From ace88e9e3a77ff3fe86aee4b7a5866b3bfd2df58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20Koutn=C3=BD?= > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:38:47 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: Add compatibility option for content of /proc/cgroups

Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups

2025-07-11 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: > Hello Ben. > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 08:22:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings > wrote: > > Would you consider reverting this change for the sake of compatibility? > > As you write, it's not fatally broken and it may be "just" an issue of

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-07-29 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Greg. I think the following commit should go into -stable but forgot to cc stable. It's now in Linus' tree. Can you please include it in -stable? Thanks! On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:13:07PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > From bb9696192826a7d9279caf872e95b41bc26c7eff Mon Sep 17

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-07-26 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:57:20AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:13 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, guys. > > > > I've committed the following patch to for-3.11-fixes. It's > > unfortunate but I can't see a good way out at t

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-07-22 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, guys. I've committed the following patch to for-3.11-fixes. It's unfortunate but I can't see a good way out at this point. :( Thanks. - 8< >From bb9696192826a7d9279caf872e95b41bc26c7eff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: M

Bug#714295: Data corruption when using INIC-1623TA2 controller

2013-06-30 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 03:49:24PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > So this does seem to be a fault in either this card or the driver. Can > you suggest any further tests that Martin could do? Unfortunately, I don't have any idea. That driver never really matured enough. I couldn't find en

Bug#598518: linux-image-2.6-686: ata_piix module loaded before ahci module deactivate hotplug support (regression from lenny)

2010-10-04 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On 09/30/2010 12:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:50 +0200, thomas.debesse+deb...@gmail.com > wrote: > [...] >> ICH6 sata controller could be managed by both ata_piix and ahci module but >> only >> ahci module handle hotplug. >> At boot time, when ata_piix is loaded b

Bug#585556: More ata_piix spurious IRQs

2010-06-12 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Ben. On 06/12/2010 01:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > (more details at ). > > This is in Debian kernel version 2.6.32-15 which is based on stable > version 2.6.32.14 but has your backported spurious IRQ handling patch > taken from SLE11 (References: bnc#445872,