>From 57c307d52c08394d30f4c94374a6e072ec4265fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Singer
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:54:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "Bug 255.""
This reverts commit 5d52c57d691776e0888f8bbc774931f8edc997de.
This brings back the fix for Bug 255. READ COMMITTED is use
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1
support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for the
MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstream bug #285) I think will
produce a working slo
>
> No, I meant that stable has slony for 8.4, and testing (the next stable)
> has slony for 9.1, which means someone upgrading from stable to the next
> stable won't experience a regression, except that they will need to make
> sure they use the repeatable read isolation level.
>
> Testing is c
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 16:00 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
In terms of Debian releases, stable contains slony built for 8.4, so
shipping slony for 9.1 that does not work with serializable transactions
is not a regression (at least with this bug
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-06-25 at 09:48 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
Slony 2.0.7 does not support/work well with Postgresql 9.1
Slony 2.1.1 does include support for Postgresql 9.1
See Upstream Slony bug #255
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255
Package: postgresql-9.1-slony1-2
Version: 2.0.7-4
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Slony 2.0.7 does not support/work well with Postgresql 9.1
Slony 2.1.1 does include support for Postgresql 9.1
See Upstream Slony bug #255
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_b
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Rebuilt on a debian machine and reproduced on ppc vm.
Attached backtrace.
The stack trace for this sqlite issue on ppc from Fedora looks similar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494266
Cheers,
Gabriele
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2010-12-19 at 22:29 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
I think a good next step would be to resolve why rebuilding packages
locally seems to work around the problem for Steve but not for you.
Which package(s) exactly are you each rebuilding locally a
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:47:20 -0500
Steve wrote:
If I build the qgis .deb files from source on my machine I don't get the
crash but the debs from the repository always crash.
Is it possible to force a rebuild of the .debs in testing?
Interesting, I can
9 matches
Mail list logo
