Hi, have you tried http://mentors.debian.net ? You can read about it at
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers :)
I forgot the actual procedure, I'm not sure if mentors.debian.net is still
used to promote and approve and sponsor new debian packages.
But you should contact the python apps team
On 29 June 2012 10:23, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> Any news about this? I use Workrave in Windows and would really like to
> see something similar for the GNOME desktop in Debian.
>
There's a workrave package for gnome as well:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=workrave
Unfortunately I
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Can you update the greek po template using the current one from launchpad
translations (precise)?
https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/apt/+pots/apt/el/+details
It seems that it hasn't been refre
Package: gnome-disk-utility
Version: 3.0.2-2ubuntu7
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
There is a new upstream release 3.4.1:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-disk-utility/
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-disk-utility/3.4/gnome-disk-utility-3.4.1.tar.xz
Note that they use
Sorry for triple-posting, by "default media applications" I mean the list
in right click > properties > open with
Also reported upstream:
https://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/issues/detail?id=2848&thanks=2848&ts=1333409435
Package: clementine
Severity: normal
Clementine is not listed in the default media applications.
The reason seems to be a wrong Exec= line in the desktop file:
Exec=clementine
This line should be:
Exec=clementine %U
The solution was found, documented and tested by several ubuntu forum
members: h
On 12 March 2012 23:41, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> >> I rather have a patch to libarchive's build system that sets '-v'
> >> option for all test programs.
> >
> >
> > I&#x
>
> I rather have a patch to libarchive's build system that sets '-v'
> option for all test programs.
>
I'll read the code and see if I can come up with something.
> Also, next time, please don't include unrelated changes in your
> patches (I'm referring to the use of '-').
>
'-' ignores the ex
Package: libarchive
Severity: wishlist
This patch should reveal log files if any tests fail.
Bad side is that it doesn't fail the build if tests fail.
I tried to use $$? to check the exit status of dh_auto_test
and fail after showing the log files, but couldn't make it
work. Looks like gnu make
Package: libarchive12
Version: 3.0.3-5
Severity: important
I believe this bug is important because it blocks the use of libgxps-utils
(e.g. xpstopdf conversion tool).
Complete description of the bug:
"infinite loop on an xps zip file"
https://code.google.com/p/libarchive/issues/detail?id=226#c5
R
On 18 February 2012 03:52, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> What's an XPS document?
>
> From Wikipedia I've learned that this is somehow related to the Open
> XML Paper Specification aka OpenXPS aka ECMA-388, a page description
> language intended to occupy some of the same niches as PDF. I guess
> some
Thanks, I'll try and expand the description this weekend. If I don't get an
ispiration I'll ask from the good folks of l10n. :)
ge, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/drwright
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drwright/drwright_3.2.4-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind reg
e uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Savvas Radevic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers oneiric-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500, 'oneiric-security'), (500,
'oneiric'), (100, 'oneiric-backports')
Ar
Package: fp-ide
Severity: normal
Also reported at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fpc/+bug/914738
There used to be a /usr/bin/fp in older ubuntu versions:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/fp-ide/filelist
Now there's a command fp-* (fp-2.4.4):
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd6
A small change:
> Finally, there is an option to lock the screen in case you want to step out
> indefinetely.
Finally, there is a button to lock the screen (while the break is active) in
case you want to step out indefinetely.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian
I hope it's better now:
Description: Typing monitor to force typing breaks
It's a program that forces you to take regular breaks to prevent RSI
(Repetitive Strain Injury). It's similar to workrave.
.
It can be found in GNOME control center as "typing break". You can specify the
work interval
On 7 January 2012 16:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 07.01.2012 14:39, Savvas Radevic wrote:
>> Description : Known as typing break in GNOME 2
>>
>> Typing monitor to force typing breaks. It's a GNOME 3 tool that forces you
>> to
>
> Now I'm con
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Savvas Radevic
* Package name: drwright
Version : 3.2.3
Upstream Author : Richard Hult
* URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/drwright
* License : GPL-2.0+
Programming Lang: C, Python (I think)
Description : Known
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Savvas Radevic
* Package name: libgxps
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Carlos Garcia Campos , Jason Crain
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/libgxps
* License : LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : GObject
Package: ttf-engadget
Version: new upstream release 1.001
Severity: normal
A new upstream release is out, 1.001.
It fixes the issue when typing "u" (was not filled, just outlined).
http://www.thibault.org/fonts/engadget/engadget-1.001-1-ttf.tar.gz
http://www.thibault.org/fonts/engadget/
-- Syste
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gpick
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Albertas Vyšniauskas
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gpick/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ to
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:08:23AM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
>> The error I receive:
>> "W: Unable to read /home/user/.chdist/hardy/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ - FileExists
>> (2: No such file or directory)"
>>
>> Note: I am not sure if this affects Deb
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.61ubuntu5
Severity: normal
The error I receive:
"W: Unable to read /home/user/.chdist/hardy/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ - FileExists
(2: No such file or directory)"
Note: I am not sure if this affects Debian's devscripts too.
Launchpad bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
@Original poster:
In order to solve this completely, or at least try to solve it, check
your BIOS settings for spread spectrum and disable it.
More info: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557949#30
@Maintainer:
I believe that this bug is due to another bug found in 1.28 version,
it
Thanks to an insightful comment, I have managed to fix my problem!
It was either spread spectrum or the d.o.t. (overclocking) technology
by MSI. Disabling these settings in BIOS helped me get a way better
setting (some milliseconds difference) -- now ntp and adjtimex work
without warning about +/-
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511994
Any update on this? It's been over a year!
Is there a git repository or a debian package that we could try? Thanks. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
My problem is back unfortunately, I have no idea what seems to be the
cause of it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adjtimex/+bug/553237/comments/6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adjtimex/+bug/553237/comments/7
My motherboard is MSI P965 Neo2 if it matters:
http://www.msi.com/
While I had this problem for a couple of days, I used a patch I made
for Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid, development):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553237
However, someone suggested to purge and try installing again, which I
did. It works great now!
$ sudo adjtimexconfig
Comparing clocks (this will take 7
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.28-1
Severity: grave
I have the same problem on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid, still under testing).
This error makes this package unusable.
It looks like that "Correctly apply +-500 ppm sanity check" applied for version
1.28 is causing problems.
Also, bug #559882 ( http://bug
Hi, I was just writing a mail sent to debian-devel mailing list. I
have to set the package as orphan.
Here's the bug report (?):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560098
I don't know if the process was done right.
Cheers,
Savvas
2009/12/8 Modestas Vainius :
> Hello,
>
> On penkta
Package: libmtp8
Severity: normal
Due to my real life problems and my limited free time, I want to set
the libmtp package as orphan. I don't know if I have done it right, I
followed the instructions at: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
The package maintainer has already retired from maintaining
(This email is CC'ed the bug report at debian: http://bugs.debian.org/545994)
Hi,
I was wondering what is the current "google sitemap generator"
homepage. Just to be sure, I mean the tool for generating sitemaps,
written in python. I have found three relative project pages:
1. http://code.google
Package: google-sitemapgen
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: normal
I think that the google-sitemapgen has moved to another place:
http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators
http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators/downloads/list
There's a new upstream release there, 1.5
Again, I'm not really sure abo
>> I think (b) is more appropriate, but I'm not sure if it's possible in
>> Debian, I'll try to use it and let you know. :)
>>
>
> That's for sure. That's the best option. I will update the dependency,
> and mark this bug as pending.
>
> Thanks for reporting,
Great! It worked here in a local pbuil
Thanks for the quick reply. :)
>> This is due to the recent change of the library files (cegui-mk2 version
>> 0.6.2-1),
>> it would help avoid errors.
>
> What kind of errors?
Sorry, I wasn't clear on this. It's more of an Ubuntu backport
compatibility error. :)
The game compiles fine! The prob
Package: smc
Version: 1.9-1~ppajaunty1
Severity: important
I think that the build-depends of the package should be updated,
"libcegui-mk2-dev (>= 0.5.0-2)" to "(>= 0.6.2)".
This is due to the recent change of the library files (cegui-mk2 version
0.6.2-1),
it would help avoid errors.
Cheers!
-
Thanks for taking care of this Santiago!
Some information for you to consider:
- There is a new version out, 8.1
- The homepage is: http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx/ (with 2 "x", not
one as initially reported)
- There is already a working package if it might help speed up the process:
http:/
Package: gnote
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: important
Cannot be built from source on karmic. As it was pointed out to me,
the debian/control build-depends is wrong:
"automake (>= 1:1.10), automake (<< 1:1.11)"
should be:
automake1.10
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-u
> I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
> involved in Debian development.
> This package is too import for me to "play with" (since I'm still a
> beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
> please do!
Typos:
I was informed that Rafael Laboissier
I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
involved in Debian development.
This package is too import for me to "play with" (since I'm still a
beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
please do!
Also, it's too risky to include a patch for older debi
Package: dillo
Version: 0.8.6-3
Severity: normal
Hi! There is a new upstream release:
http://www.dillo.org/download.html
(Currently 2.1.1)
Please package it, thank you!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-se
Package: luckybackup
Version: 0.3.2-1~ppajaunty1
Severity: wishlist
Please include the translations for various languages:
http://luckybackup.sourceforge.net/languages.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty
Package: vlc
Version: 0.9.9a-3
Severity: normal
Please package the latest upstream release 1.0.0:
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
Thank you!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-security'), (500, 'jaunty')
Archi
> I already added a patch looking quite the same yesterday. Have a look at
>
> http://bzr.debian.org/loggerhead/users/torsten/ddclient/revision/21?
Cool!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
>> Perhaps that option should better be passed on the command line from the init
>> script.
>
> True, it looks like an option that should be taken care of the init
> script. Thanks again!
Here's the diff patch for debian/ddclient.init ( aka /etc/init.d/ddclient ).
--- ddclient-3.8.0/debian/ddclien
> Okay, that would be because the config file does not specify the "pid=..."
> option to set the file where the pid is recorded.
>
> Just add "pid=/var/run/ddclient.pid" to the config file and it should work.
$ sudo /etc/init.d/ddclient start
$ sudo /etc/init.d/ddclient status
Status of Dynamic DN
Package: ddclient
Version: 3.8.0-3
Severity: important
I've just tried to run the daemon with the configuration provided from
dnsomatic:
https://www.dnsomatic.com/wiki/ddclient
When I try to stop the daemon it is still running:
$ sudo /etc/init.d/ddclient start
$ ps aux | grep -i ddcli
testuser
Just to let you know that there's a request for packaging this new
version at Ubuntu too:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
CC'ed the bug report
2009/6/3 Savvas Radevic :
> Sean, thank you, very helpful!
>
> Rafael:
>> That said, i am wondering why the libmtp.rules files should be versioned,
>> as we are doing currently. Perhaps, the 45-libmpt8.rules files would
>> work just fine wit
> Rafael, you are right, it probably will. But I'm worried about these:
> (1) Is the remaining /etc/udev/libmtp.rules (and symlink
> /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules) going to affect libmtp8? We'll have to
> ask upstream I guess.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809062&aid=2800399&gr
@Sean: thank you for the tip, didn't know that! :)
Sean, can you reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy libmtp5 libmtp6
apt-cache rdepends libmtp5 libmtp6
I really need to see where they came from, if they were manually
installed (or from another source) and if any packages depend on it.
Rap
2009/6/2 Savvas Radevic :
>
> ..which is removed by debian/libmtp.postinst.in:
> rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
Correction:
..which is removed by debian/libmtp.preinst.in:
rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
> * Savvas Radevic [2009-06-02 15:51]:
>
>> Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is "Breaks" allowed on older libmtp* packages?
>
> No, for the same reason Replaces is not allowed.
>
>> It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not in /lib)
>
>
> In sum: never, ever try to implement Conflicts/Replaces as proposed
> above.
Noted! :)
I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
updated to the latest available package:
libmtp8 0.3.7-7
Sean, is my assumption true?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r
> I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
> updated to the latest available package:
> libmtp8 0.3.7-7
>
> Sean, is my assumption true?
>
Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is "Breaks" allowed on older libmtp* packages?
It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rul
I'm not completely sure, but I think the package is missing
"Conflicts" and "Replaces" for older libmtp* packages?
Something like:
Conflicts: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
Replaces: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
..in debian/control.in and debian/control files.
Thoughts?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
That's quite an old package, I don't see it in the supported releases:
http://packages.debian.org/libmtp5
Can you explain how did this happen?
I can only assume that you upgraded, but from which older release to
which one, using which commands? :)
Also, reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy
>> I'm not absolutely sure, but I think
>> that on Ubuntu, packages under "Recommends" are installed, it would a
>> pitty to make a specific version just to remove this type of
>> dependency.
>
> Please never do that: take the time to research an issue before mentionning
> it in a bug report, else
> first thanks for your report and trying to make Debian better. :-)
Thanks! :)
> But I have to close your report, because it is not a circular dependency as
> written in Debian policy 7.2. The problem with circular depends are at the
> dpkg part, not apt{itude}, and dpkg does not care about recom
> - drop the dependency to "Enhances: luckybackup" (probably depend on the
> binary/source version too?)
Actually, I think there's no need for binary/source version
dependency, since it's just "Enhances". :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Package: luckybackup
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
There are circular dependencies between luckybackup and luckybackup-data.
That could create problems and it's best to be avoided.
luckybackup-data can "live" on its own, so either should be fine:
- there's no need for "Recommend
Package: luckybackup
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: minor
Please package the new version when you see fit:
Version 0.3.1 :
* Bug fix: fixed rsync progress window that displayed wrong information
about source & destination directories
* Added backup time-stamps to know when tasks were last exec
Package: rst2pdf
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: normal
Please update to the latest version, 0.10.1.
They have fixed a lot of bugs.
Thank you!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-security'), (500, 'jaunty')
Archite
2009/5/16 Serafeim Zanikolas :
>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~zanikols/tmp/debian/pdfshuffler-0.4.1.tar.gz
>> instead of
>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~zanikols/tmp/debian/pdfshuffler_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
>> which would be the normal case for a non debian native package.
>
> I use git-buildpackage which tak
Hello, may I ask why was this bug status set as "Won't fix"?
There is already a working patch from Ubuntu:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/e/eggdrop/eggdrop_1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Your package is perfect!
However I have some minor suggestions:
- You could take advantage of the debhelper 7 easy debian/rules, see
the attachment from bleachbit package, (the new quilt package uses
dh_quilt_unpatch, so build-depends of bleachbit has "debhelper (>= 7),
quilt (>= 0.46-7)")
- Minor
Package: tomboy
Severity: normal
I was informed that the documents under help/ are under GFDL license.
1. The copyright should state that:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tomboy/current/copyright
2. It needs a COPYING-DOCS in the help/ directory. Upstream has already
included t
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.20.2ubuntu6
Severity: normal
Problem: I would like to download several packages with their dependencies
through apt-get. Specifically, I am using chdist and apt-get, so it would
be a great comfort if this bug is fixed.
Description:
While having installed nvidia-glx-180
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.49
Severity: minor
Is it possible to pre-check and print something like "Error: etc/apt/apt.conf
does not exist" ?
If a relative data-dir is used and/or if for some reason the etc/apt/apt.conf
file is not created, running apt-get update through chdist pops up t
I'm not sure if this completely true, perhaps the ubuntu changes are
causing a problem, I'll check later.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.49
Severity: normal
Using -d / --data-dir should either
a) accept relative paths or
b) mention in the manual page / help message that it accepts only
absolute paths
Not working example with relative path (or just directory name):
$ chdist -d "test" create ja
I made a new debdiff using the correct distribution.
Also, please consider removing the 0.2.5-1 check in
debian/libmtp.preinst.in (debian stable has version 0.2.6.1-3):
if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le 0.2.5-1 ; then
rm_conffile $PACKAGE /etc/hotplug/usb/$PACKAGE.usermap
rm_c
cott James Remnant.
+ * debian/control: Add Breaks to ensure the right udev version gets used.
+ * debian/libmtp.install.in, debian/libmtp.preinst.in,
+debian/libmtp.postinst.in: Clean up the mess where files were still going
+into the wrong directory.
+ * debian/rules: Append prope
> Savvas, please would you compare yours with it, and if you have any
> suggestions/improvements on the packaging let me know about it so they
> can be merged? Thanks
Hello! Here is a summary of changes:
- 0.3.0 is out :)
- You should have a debian/watch file - I didn't make one since I'm
based
Hi, I am terribly sorry, I forgot to update the patch in debian based
on ubuntu. The patch attached in debian needs Namely, there are two
patches involved. Which patch did you use?
This is the ubuntu patch similar to the one I included in the debian report:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23325206/c
Package: pure-ftpd
Version: 1.0.21-12
Severity: normal
Please update the package to follow the latest debian policy standards.
There are currently 1 error and 62 warnings that lintian shows:
http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/ra...@linuxia.de.html#pure-ftpd
Out of all of them, I would like you
Package: sqlite3
Version: 3.6.12-1
Severity: important
Hello, just to let you know that there is a new upstream release:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=sqlite3
Version 3.6.13 is said to (didn't try it) fix the default value crash:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
According to this bug reporting Ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smc/+bug/136435
..it's probably using one or more of these:
/usr/lib/libCEGUIBase.la
/usr/lib/libCEGUIBase.so
/usr/lib/libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.la
/usr/lib/libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.so
/usr/lib/libCEGUIFalagardWRBase.l
Package: midori
Version: 0.1.4-2
Severity: normal
There is a new upstream release, please package it.
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=midori
Thank you!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-se
Package: alarm-clock
Version: 0.9.18-3
Severity: normal
There is a new upstream release:
http://www.alarm-clock.pl/downloads.php
Also, there's been a change in homepage.
debian/control should use:
http://www.alarm-clock.pl
debian/watch should use:
http://www.alarm-clock.pl/downloads/
The current
Package: vlc
Version: 0.9.8a-3
Severity: normal
There is a new upstream release, 0.9.9:
http://download.videolan.org/pub/videolan/vlc/
http://download.videolan.org/pub/videolan/vlc/0.9.9/vlc-0.9.9.tar.bz2
Please update the package, thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers
Package: capisuite
Version: 0.4.5-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
This is just to inform you that a patch has been applied for python 2.6
compatibility for ubuntu. The patch:
- tries to get the python from the correct directories
- contains a fix that disables the dependency on LOCALMODLIBS (remov
Package: gtk-sharp2
Version: 2.12.8-2
Severity: normal
Depends: gtk-sharp2-examples, gtk-sharp2-gapi, libglib2.0-cil, libgtk2.0-cil,
libglade2.0-cil,
monodoc-gtk2.0-manual
Package gtk-sharp2 should only suggest the documentation packages:
gtk-sharp2-examples
monodoc-gtk2.0-manual
Otherwise, p
Package: ocropus
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream release for ocropus:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=ocropus
Please package it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haskell-zip-archive
Version : 0.1.1.3
Upstream Author : John MacFarlane
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/zip-archive
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Haskell
Descriptio
Just thought of letting you know that 1.2 is out:
http://code.google.com/p/pandoc/downloads/list
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Just thought of letting you know that 1.2 is out:
http://code.google.com/p/pandoc/downloads/list
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I was trying to merge the new version for Ubuntu:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsi/+bug/237674
And I noticed that CHANGES says that upstream has dropped python-xml:
Change for 2.1.0_a1 released 31-Oct-2007:
- No PyXML Dependency, use minidom by default (much faster)
Is it
Package: pidgin-mpris
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Please remove the bmpx dependency, as it is not available anymore:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517588
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, '
I cannot contact the original developer/author, the address fails to
receive an email:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
d...@windowma
Hi, since I noticed that you have provided a new source for decompyle
to support 2.3, can you add support for python 2.5 or 2.6?
There are filed requests for the removal of the package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518124
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336859
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: decompyle
Version: 2.3.2-4.1
Severity: wishlist
Please port it for python2.5/python2.6 or consider removing it, as the package
seems
unmaintained upstream.
Original request at:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/336859
"debian/copyright specifies:
The original website from which this software
Hi, what's the progress on this one?
Mind you, the author has already an ongoing progress for Ubuntu
approval, which you could use:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.org/p/pdfshuffler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Hi, what's the progress on this one?
Mind you, the author has already an ongoing progress for Ubuntu
approval, which you could use:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.org/p/pdfshuffler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
instead of java-gcj-compat-dev
++ libxerces2-java-doc dropped to Recommends
+ * debian/rules: JAVA_HOME as /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
+
+ -- Savvas Radevic Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:38:50 +0100
+
bcel (5.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Added link from /usr/share/ant/lib/bcel.jar to /usr/share/
> As far as I see, it's failing to build since this debian imported version:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx/0.40.14-1
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx/0.40.14-1/+build/752955
This is the machine it was failed on:
https://launchpad.net/+builds/adare
Architecture: PowerPC G3
As far as I see, it's failing to build since this debian imported version:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx/0.40.14-1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx/0.40.14-1/+build/752955
It's probably like you said a difference in the debian/ubuntu packages.
Thanks for testing it and for th
Package: python-webpy
Version: 0.310-1
Severity: serious
webpy upstream versioning has been changed.
As it is shown at http://webpy.org/static/, webpy uses 0.31
python-webpy uses 0.310.
"5.6.12 Version
The version number of a package. The format is:
[epoch:]upstream_version[-debian_revision]"
I
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
