On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:49 +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rusty, about 10 days ago. I've sent a message in which you were in Cc,
> to deal with manpages translation.
Sorry, I've been lax.
I believe translations are very important and should be distributed, but
I've never done so before
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:48 +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too,
> > but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe
> > they have disappeared. See her
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 19:53 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 29, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please send complete log.
> Here it is. I can reproduce the bug even with a script like:
>
> while read m; do
> /sbin/modprobe.real $m &
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 15:08 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 28, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in
> > the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack.
> No luck.
Pl
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
> Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this issue some more.
This is a possibility I was aware of when I changed to cod
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 15:38 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
> >
> > I do not understand how this can hap
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Any comments?
Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur
until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only don
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:26 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > What do you think about this? It happens when udevd tries to load a
> > dozen of modules at boot time. Is there a race in modules loading?
> > It happens less frequently with ot
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 00:21 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> What do you think about this proposed change?
> > Hello,
> >
> > while rewritting the init script of sl-modem-daemon I noticed that
> > modprobe -r does not have reliable && consistant && useful error codes.
> > That means, it differs from
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 02:50 +0200, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just spent a good hour trying to figure out a problem with modprobe
> (Debian package version 3.2-pre1). My issue was that if
> /etc/modprobe.conf is found, /etc/modprobe.d is not even considered,
> which was not obvious
Package: heimdal
Severity: normal
Should specify a version of comerr in the build depends: seems to try to
use an internal comerr which it doesn't build. Works fine with the
newer comerr version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Ar
11 matches
Mail list logo
