ed, 2025-05-14 at 01:59 -0700, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > >> Thanks for your feedback, Ben!
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 8:21 PM Ben Hutchings
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 19:33 -0700, Roge
Dear Loïc,
Thanks for your feedback!
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 5:37 AM Loïc Minier
wrote:
>
> Hi Roger and all!
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:45:49AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > * non-free:
> > >- Software that runs on the host must go here
> > >- Firmware that runs on peripheral
Thanks for your feedback, Ben!
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 8:21 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 19:33 -0700, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > [ update Dmitry's email ]
> >
> > Dear Ben,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> >
> >
[ update Dmitry's email ]
Dear Ben,
Thanks for your feedback!
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 7:05 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 01:02 -0700, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Roger Shimizu
> > X-Debbugs-C
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:06 AM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Roger Shimizu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, r...@debian.org
>
> * Package name: linux-board-support-package-rb3gen2
> Version : 1.1
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, r...@debian.org
* Package name: linux-board-support-package-rb3gen2
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Linaro
* URL :
https://artifacts.codelinaro.org/ui/native/qli-ci
control: tags -1 -sid
I tried on porterbox barriere for amd64, and found it builds well on sid.
Only ftbfs issue is on trixie.
Guessing the dependency is different between sid and testing.
-Roger
control: notfixed -1 android-udev-rules/20250314+ds-4
control: fixed -1 android-udev-rules/0~20250314+ds-4
sorry for the previous typo. and this email should fix them all.
-Roger
control: notfixed -1 20250314+ds-4
control: fixed -1 android-udev-rules/0~20250314+ds-4
sorry for the previous typo. and this email should fix them all.
control: fixed -1 android-udev-rules/20250314+ds-4
is this the same as #1102321?
looks very similar.
-Roger
control: fixed -1 20250314+ds-4
is this the same as #1102321?
looks very similar.
-Roger
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:07 AM Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
>
> Still, I'm happy that you agree with my proposal. I'll take a look now;
> it's been a while.
Thanks for the upload, and now it hit testing!
Can you kindly move the new repo to team's git repo?
- https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-tea
control: tag -1 +patch
Thanks for the report, and patch!
Seems like it's not good idea to add this patch before a new debian
release (soon).
I'll add this after the next debian release.
-Roger
> Can the fix in the salsa repository be uploaded to the archive to avoid
> torbrowser-launcher being autoremoved from testing?
Thanks for the ping!
I'll upload asap.
-Roger
Package: qdl
Version: 1.0+git20250319.30ac3a8-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Since upstream tagged v2.x release since Aug. 2024, and now there's
v2.1, I think it's time to bump Debian version.
For now, the version can be: 2.1+git20250319.30ac3a8-1
Thanks for the maintenance for this package
> - - The rules don't risk being removed from testing because of bugs in the SDK
> package or its dependencies (which is currently the case)
Thanks for the report!
I agree with above point.
If you can create the package and upload to mentors, I can sponsor
upload to sid.
-Roger
Thanks Carter for the report!
Seems like package android-sdk-platform-tools-common provides the udev
[1], so better to move there?
[1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/android-sdk-platform-tools-common
Cheers
> libartbase/base/strlcpy.h:31:22: error: static declaration of 'strlcpy'
> follows non-static declaration
I just checked the build on arm64 porterbox: amdahl
Now the error string changed from above to the following below.
Seems like it's not so easy to fix this.
In file included from libar
Dear Chris,
Thanks for your interests in android related packages!
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:34 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 08:26:11AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 09:14:53PM -0700, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > > rel
control: severity -1 normal
related to #1062209, and #1062110
so aligning with the same way to the bug report.
[ copy the email from Hans ]
Thanks for reporting! In the Android Tools case, the shared libs and packages
that use them are packaged together, often from the same source package, so I
Thanks for your help on the package, Chris!
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 1:03 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded the patch as an NMU versioned 1.29-11.1. It also
> includes the janitor changes from salsa.
>
> The result can be found in the "nmu" branc
Dear Yokota-san,
Thanks for your review for my MR!
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 7:50 PM yokota wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > It's confirmed to work with my package: android-platform-tools
> > which currently includes a copy of lzma.
>
> Your patch breaks existing 7z command.
> Check formats-7z and benchmark
Package: 7zip
Version: 23.01+dfsg-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/7zip/-/merge_requests/6
Please kindly consider merge the MR above, to add devel and library
package: lib7zip-dev and lib7zip0
It's confirmed to work with my package: android-platfor
control: tags -1 +help
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 8:09 AM Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
> Package: adjtimex
> Version: 1.29-11+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> Logging the clock screw to optimize parameters in /etc/adjtime is a
> major function of adjtimex. But it is now incompatible to the needed
> ntpdate:
>~
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-1~exp1
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-2~bpo11+1
control: tags -1 +wontfix
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-1~exp1
control: tags -1 wontfix
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-2~bpo11+1
I think this issue was already fixed in bullseye-backports (0.3.6-2~bpo11+1).
control: reassign -1 wnpp
control: retitle -1 RFP: Please package tor-browser to replace
torbrowser-launcher
Package name: tor-browser
Version : 115.2.0esr-13.0-1-build2
URL : https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser
License : Mozilla Publi
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-1~exp1
control: fixed -1 0.3.6-2~bpo11+1
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:33 AM SIMONE DEIANA wrote:
>
> Package: torbrowser-launcher
> Version: 0.3.3-6
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: bugreport.debian.acco...@simonedeiana.xyz
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Currently the torbrow
Thanks, Dmitry, for the prompt fix/update!
On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 2:09 PM Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Sept 2023 at 11:23, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > Thanks for your ITP & RFS!
> >
> > Some nitpicking:
> > * debian/README.Debian:
> > Please a
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Dear Dmitry,
Thanks for your ITP & RFS!
Some nitpicking:
* debian/README.Debian:
Please add more description, or remove this file.
* debian/include/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h
This header is not upstreamed yet?
Is it possible to use existing debian p
Dear Dmitry,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:50 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> Just to note, we have updated linux-firmware with the files from
> http://releases.linaro.org/96boards/dragonboard845c/qualcomm/firmware/RB3_firmware_2022112100-v5.zip
Thanks for your info!
My previous upl
control: tag -1 +pending
uploaded fix to bullseye-backport
pending for NEW queue check
ing to ITP this email thread mentioned.
Cheers,
Roger
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 11:23 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:33 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> wrote:
> >
> > On 24/04/2023 11:18, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:31 AM Dmitry Baryshk
> I'm afraid this fix is incomplete. The source package still contains the
> data files with a non-free license and hence Debian is redistrbuting
> them. golang-v2ray-core needs to be repacked to completly get rid of the
> files.
Yes, current fix just removes the geoip data from binary package.
Fo
Dear KiBi,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 9:24 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Source: linux
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> ... that's why I'm sticking to this
> particular architecture in my initial patch.
Did you forget to enclose the patch?
Do you still have it?
Cheers,
Roger
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:33 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On 24/04/2023 11:18, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:31 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 11:28, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >>>
> &
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:31 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 11:28, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:47 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 10:06, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> &
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:47 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 10:06, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:47 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 21:36, Roger Shimizu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:47 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 21:36, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Roger, FTP masters,
> > > Short story: the uploaded linux-board-support-package-dragonboard845c
> > > package (currently in NE
> Hello Roger, FTP masters,
> Short story: the uploaded linux-board-support-package-dragonboard845c package
> (currently in NEW) contains a file with unclear license background and as
> such it should not be allowed into the archive.
> The orig.tar.gz file needs to be repackaged before uploading.
Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Roger Shimizu
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > * Package name: linux-board-support-package-dragonboard845c
> > Version : 2019
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: linux-board-support-package-rb5
Version : 20210901-v6
Upstream Author : Linaro
* URL : https://releases.linaro.org/96boards/rb5/qualcomm/firmware
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: linux-board-support-package-dragonboard845c
Version : 20190529180356-v4
Upstream Author : Linaro
* URL :
https://releases.linaro.org/96boards
control: found -1 1:13.0.0+r30-1~exp1
still occurs in latest experimental version.
Dear Hans-Christoph,
Now the main blocker for migrating android-platform-tools from
experimental to sid is:
-
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=android-platform-tools
And blocker for migrating android-platform-frameworks-base is Bug#1014831
- https://bugs.debian.org/101483
Dear Jochen,
> Oups, sorry. The attached patch against android-platform-tools fixes the
> issue for me.
Very appreciated!
I tried the patch in pbuilder and porterbox, and found the patch need
slight modify.
Enclosed is the patch confirmed working on my side.
BTW. The patch was already incorpora
Dear Jochen,
Thanks for your reply, and kindness trying to help!
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 1:30 PM Jochen Sprickerhof
wrote:
> What exactly did you test?
Please try the version in experimental.
and also refer the version info of this ticket:
Found in versions android-platform-frameworks-base/1:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 2:03 PM Richard Z wrote:
>
> I think this lint warning is relevant:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files?version=2.114.162
>
> Might be best to mark it as
> Architecture: all
Upstream only support amd64 and i386
- https://aus1.torprojec
control: tags -1 +help
+ Hans-Christoph
Dear Hans-Christoph,
It'd be appreciated if you can help this ticket.
I tried a few ways, but it still doesn't work.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 12:09 AM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> control: reopen -1
>
> Yes, it ftbfs on sid now.
> An
control: reopen -1
Yes, it ftbfs on sid now.
And I tried latest upstream 13.0.0_r24, result is the same.
Have to fix this issue before we can migrate to sid.
control: severity -1 wishlist
src:android-platform-tools provides binary fastboot, and you can
easily install version 29, which is even in bullseye backports.
if you need version 30 or above, it's in experimental only.
control: tags -1 +pending
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:58 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> On 16/01/2023 05.58, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >> please switch the Build-Depends of your package from `dkms` to `dh-dkms`
> >> or (preferrably) `dh-sequen
Dear Andreas,
Thanks for the ticket, and helping to improve this package!
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 2:21 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Source: broadcom-sta
> Version: 6.30.223.271-23
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> please switch the Build-Depends of your package from `dkms` to `dh-dkms`
> or (pr
Dear Mattia,
Thanks for the remind!
I'll upload the patch to sid soon.
Cheers,
Roger
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 8:49 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:48:06PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > I tried your patch by installing protobuf in
Package: android-platform-frameworks-base
Version: 1:13~beta3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
Justification: must
Dear Maintainer,
aapt2 does not work at all, even `aapt2 version` fails.
So I disabled the aapt2 invoking while building for 1:13~beta3-1~exp1:
-
https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team
for compressing.
Some bugs were fixed.
Latest 22.00 was just out a few weeks ago, I'm not sure whether it's
stable or not.
But 21.07 should be stable enough to package.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
initially uploaded on 2016, 6 years ago.
And there's git repo on salsa for src:p7zip:
- https://salsa.debian.org/debian/p7zip
I think maintaining both packages is not necessary, and hope can either
one to update to the latest upstream verion, 22.00.
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +
control: tags -1 pending
Dear GCS,
I tried your patch by installing protobuf in experimental
and confirmed it builds well, and all tests are also OK.
Will upload after protobuf 3.20 (or later) hits unstable.
Thanks for your support!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R
control: tags -1 -ftbfs
control: severity -1 normal
I think currently there's no ftbfs issue for this package.
So no immediate urgency to upgrade package.
It's still welcome that anyone can help to package the new
dependencies to NEW queue.
Thanks for the work from you all!
Cheers,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 2:26 AM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 18:10 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > I didn‘t know there's "Testing follows removal automatically" rule,
> > and just saw the wiki [1] says ftpmaster can only remove from sid &
me more commits / patches than MR.
So please make another MR to release all your patches to salsa.
After that I can sponsor the upload to experimental.
Cheers,
Roger
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:59 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> Dear Bastian,
>
> Thanks for the ping!
> I'll check this packag
Fab Stz wrote:
> > I already sent an email on 21/Oct & 19/Nov to android-tools-
> > de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Roger Shimizu concerning a
> > merge request for that package. I haven't seen an anwser yet.
> >
> > Message was:
> > Hello
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:49 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 18-05-2022 18:22, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > This ticket is a follow-up to #100
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/100
> >
> > I marked this ticket with ROM and NVIU, because:
> &g
droid-platform-tools latest version migrating to testing
successfully, we have to remove src:android-platform-tools from
testing.
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
te:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17-05-2022 06:11, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > [ Other info ]
> > Package android-platform-art and android-platform-frameworks-base should be
> > migrated at the same time.
> >
> > unblock android-platform-tools/29.0.6-14
> > unblock andr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Since src:android-platform-system-core is already replaced by
src:android-platform-tools, please kindly help to remove
src:android-platform-system-core from testing.
For stable and eailer suits,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package android-platform-tools
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by
filling in the section
wline
.cfi_restore_state .cfi_def_cfa rsp,16
^
art/runtime/arch/x86_64/quick_entrypoints_x86_64.S:2263:24: error:
expected newline
.cfi_restore_state .cfi_def_cfa rsp,80
^
for other ARCH, there might be other errors as well.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, G
n pass without problem.
Can you kindly retest?
Do we have a workflow regarding to such case?
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
without issue.
Of course I can upload a backports version, but I guess it will be the
same on your side.
Maybe you can clean up ~/.local/share/torbrowser/ folder and try again.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
se request this in upstream:
- https://github.com/micahflee/torbrowser-launcher
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
debian (or master) branch with upstream tag. Maybe removing
some files in "excluded" of d/copyright is necessary.
- use gbp command to build
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Roger
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 5:49 PM Aloïs Micard wrote:
>
> Hello Roger,
>
> On 14/11/2021 09:11, Roger Shimizu wr
Dear Aloïs,
Thanks for your work to go packages!
Sorry I don't have time lately. So if you can update the packages and
fix the RC bugs, it'd be appreciated.
Cheers,
Roger
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:22 PM Aloïs Micard wrote:
>
> Hello there, I hope you are doing fine!
>
> I don't know if you reca
should be caused by:
- https://bugs.debian.org/897653
if you upgrade tar to buster version 1.30+dfsg-6 or later, it should
be resolved.
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package repo
[ Reason ]
* Cherry-pick upstream patch to make manpages system independent,
which shows no CPU cores of build system.
* Remove local patch to generate manpage
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 6:00 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:55:32 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > According to the dirmngr(8) man page, the default built-in server is
> > «hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net». Given the recent attacks, and
> > the problems inherent in that network,
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>
> Package: torbrowser-launcher
> Version: 0.3.3-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I updated torbrowser-launcher from 0.2.9-1~bpo9+1 to 0.3.2-14~bpo10+1. This
> has rendered
> torbrowser-launcher un
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Grzegorz,
Per the posts below, I guess this issue is already resolved.
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1685794
- https://lwn.net/Articles/760121/
Can you kindly confirm at your side?
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP
gt; in the spam folder :(.
>
> Thanks for your comments and eagerness to welcome and test this, I'm
> really glad that more people will find this useful :) :)
>
> Some comments:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:08 AM Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > > My "
Update the patch from Guillem Jover
to add fuzz rule for hurd and kfreebsd.
Hope this patch can be merged some day.
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
deb-porterbox
Description: Binary data
y try latest 6.30.223.271-16 or its backports version.
If it still doesn't work for you, you may try b43 driver [1]
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
such apparmor errors and
cannot reproduce locally.
So please kindly provide more information.
Maybe you can remove local cache of tbb and try again?
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
not much I can do as pkg maintainer.
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Dear Paul,
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:36 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 18:58:37 +0900 Roger Shimizu
> wrote:
> > However I find this package cannot be source upload, due to non-free.
> > I'll upload with binary again with version
level.
The issue resolved in this upload is: after installing
broadcom-sta-source, when user try to build their own deb files by
using tool module-assistant, the deb build would fail.
The user built deb is not for upload to debian archive, but for
private use only.
Personally I don't ins
> control: retitle -1 unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17
>
> unblock broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17
ping.
I'm asking because this package is marked as autoremoval from testing
on June 8th.
Is there any concern regarding to the unblocking?
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GM
ve the current version migrate first.
Yes, #988119 is not a regression issue.
I think it's better to let current version migrate first.
Current version doesn't have any feature change, so it's quite safe.
For #988119 I need some time to fix, and test to confirm it's safe to
del
n the d/changelog
> [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing
>
> [ Other info ]
Sorry I have to re-upload, because this is non-free and won't get
built on buildd.
I re-uploaded with binary, with no actual code change s
later.
After that, I'll amend your unblock request.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package broadcom-sta
[ the reason for the unblock ]
It fixes a serious bug #987159
that txpower cannot get/set correctly, with some other fixes.
The patches are in experiment
control: tags -1 +pending
uploaded.
Now pending in NEW queue.
o lack of web-ext, which is under RFP:
* https://bugs.debian.org/877977
I'm not familiar with nodejs, so it'd be appreciated if anyone can help.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:39 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package adjtimex
I checked autoremovals [1], seems the package will be removed before
-Requires-Root: no
+
+ -- Roger Shimizu Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:11:49 +0900
+
adjtimex (1.29-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/patches:
diff -Nru adjtimex-1.29/debian/control adjtimex-1.29/debian/control
--- adjtimex-1.29/debian/control2018-07-24 18:50:56.0 +0900
+++ adjtimex-1.29
control: found -1 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-1
control: affects -1 adjtimex
control: block 944867 by -1
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:33 AM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> I found since buster version, -p samples default value changed from 4,
> which is in manpage, to 1.
Should be related to this commit
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.8p15+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I found since buster version, -p samples default value changed from 4,
which is in manpage, to 1.
So it will output "filter delay:" and "filter offset:" lines by
default in stretch version, 1:4.2.8p10+ based; but wil
t.
$ sudo ntpdate -d -p4 -q pool.ntp.org
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
1 - 100 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
