Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

severity 292337 serious thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

reopen 292337 thanks doc++ builds ok but segfaults when run during libupnp_1.2.1-1 build. Rick -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#167780: Unidentified subject!

Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > > > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I > > > would like > > > | > to request the same for the following packages: > > > | > > > > | >octave2.1, quantlib, r-base > > > | > > > > | > for the > > > | > > > > | >arm, m68k

Bug#167780: (no subject)

Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing] Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k > > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I would > like > | > to request the same for the follow

Bug#292337: doc++ segfaults on m68k, including during its own build

severity 292337 serious thanks > The problem appears and dissapears. Using a m68k on steroids it is > possible to compile it, as it seems to be a problem of system resources > or something like that. ? doc++ no longer builds on any m68k we have and anything that uses it to build also fails when