Hi!
> AFAICT midgard2-core is the only package of the two having an open RC
> bug affecting testing (namely, #677795). So keeping it while removing
> php5-midgard2 from testing would not help us (from a release PoV).
> Note that php5-midgard2 is only being removed because it
> (Build-)Depnds on
Hi!
>> After 300 days the easiest solution seems to be "will-remove for now"
>> but there hasn't been any single explanation why one package migrated
>> while the other not?
>
> It didn't migrate because of #678531 still being considered as open by
> the BTS until Niels fixed the bug state up in N
Hi!
> for the record, the discussion on #677795 lead to a release team
> member write "As it is, I am inclined to agree with OdyX's
> observations, so I am tagging the bug as will-remove for now".
>
> I don't feel I have the right hat to close these two unblock requests
> (#688966 and #692358) acc
>> Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are
>> distributed together.
>
> Why?
Because php5-midgard2 provides language bindings to midgard2 content repository.
Unfortunately there's no php-gir bindings. Testing distribution has
midgard2-core 10.05.7 and php5-midgard2 10.05.6. Bo
>> Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
>> only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
>
> OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are
distributed together.
In any o
Hi!
> So, php5-midgard2 would need just a rebuild to pick up the new library
> name, together with uploading of midgard2-core. The mentors link of
> php5-midgard2 has expired, but if I recall correctly Piotr had only
> indeed put it there with a changelog entry like "rebuild", so there are
> no ac
000 +0100
+++ php5-midgard2-10.05.7/debian/changelog 2012-06-16 00:06:45.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
+php5-midgard2 (10.05.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream
+ * Use php5en(dis)mod in prerm and postinst. Closes: #667785
+
+ -- Piotr Pokora Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:34:29 +0200
+
php5-m
Hi!
> Wheezy has php5-midgard2 version 10.05.6-1.
>
> If you want an unblock for version 10.05.7-1, you need to look at the
> freeze
I am not sure due to #688966.
If midgard2-core is accepted to stable, then php5-midgard2 might break.
> Also, you should include the debdiff between both versions
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Please review php5-midgard2 for inclusion in wheezy.
This package has no single bug submitted.
It provides PHP extension for Midgard2 Content Repository.
PHP is currently the most popular language used with
Hi!
> this is a quick update on what's going on with your package in NEW.
>
> We're holding it due to a library transition which would affect some
> reverse
> dependencies. As Wheezy is frozen, Release Team asked us to refrain from
> processing packages which introduce unplanned transitions, as th
Hi!
>> Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
>
> I'm assuming you mean wheezy?
Of course wheezy :)
>> Package contains only one RC bug:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
>
> and hopefully "fixes one RC bug" :-)
It's worth mentioning that lintian (-i -I -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
Package contains only one RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
New source package which fixes the bug (with renamed packages)
Hi!
Confirmed and reproduced. It'll be fixed ASAP.
I wonder though, why this doesn't happen on travis (for example),
where tests (and library loading) are run frequently.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hi!
>> I expect new release in two or three weeks, so then, I'll update
>> debian packages.
>
> Another 3 weeks have passed.
Yes, I know. Sorry for being quiet.
> Did the upstream release happen in the mean
> time?
We have some issue with postgresql provider. At least tests started to
fail with
Hi!
> Since it is May now, I wanted to kindly ask what the current state is.
> Any progress since we last talked? Any blockers getting midgard2-core
> updated?
Upstream is updated and tested against libgda 5.0.
I expect new release in two or three weeks, so then, I'll update
debian packages.
Pio
> Given that wheezy is planned to be frozen around June/July, seeing the
> switch happen sooner rather then later would imho be good as it would
> give more time for testing.
Yes, you are right. But currently we have enough problems with libgda
4.0 and 4.2 available here or there. Depending on 5.0
> Hi Piotr,
Hi!
> did you have time to look into this?
The plan is to depend on 5.0 since May 2012.
https://github.com/midgardproject/midgard-core/issues/135
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-db-list/2012-January/msg7.html
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
Hi!
This issue is fixed in upstream.
The new version is expected to be released in mid February.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| python-midgard2 : Depends: python (< 2.7) but 2.7.2-9 is to be installed
| E: Broken packages
This package could be removed. No more upstream development since Python
and GIR does the job great.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
>>> Note that this is the last bit for the gir1.2 transition. If you don't drop
>>> the
>>> gir1.0-midgard2 package from unstable, midgard2-core may be removed from
>>> testing.
>>
>> I doubt there's anything I can do.
>
> There is: you can build midgard2-core with --disable-introspection and re
W dniu 06.04.2011 11:57, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
> On 04/04/11 12:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Just to clarify, we mean dropping gir1.0 packages from unstable, not gir1.2
>> packages from experimental. This is temporary until libgda4 builds gir1.2
>> packages in unstable, of course. l
Hi!
>> IMO, it doesn't make sense to move it and disable/enable gir here and
>> there. Just keep going with gir 1.2 transition and ignore midgard2-core
>> and libgda4 packages.
>>
> Not sure what you mean here.
I understood that either packages are uploaded to sid without gir ones
or they are rem
Hi!
> According to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort from the gnome team, midgard2-core
> should temporarily drop its gir bindings so we can go ahead with the
> gir1.2 transition.
Can you keep midgard2-core and libgda4 in experimental?
IMO, it doesn't make sense to move it and disable/enable gir here and
On 25.10.2010 20:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Which of the fixes mentioned in upstream's changelog does the above
refer to?
* libgda/gda-debug-macros.h, libgda/gda-transaction-status.c: Removed
internal debug macros
Both of those changes are to code which is in "#ifdef GDA_DEBUG" blocks
On 23.10.2010 19:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Without this release, any derived application or library breaks to build
with GObject Introspection enabled.
Which of the fixes mentioned in upstream's changelog does the above
refer to?
* libgda/gda-debug-macros.h, libgda/gda-transaction-status.c:
Here's GDA 4.0.11 upstream changelog:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/libgda/4.0/libgda-4.0.11.changes
4.0.10 is not available as mentioned in changes.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please consider freeze exception for libgda4 package.
Recent, maintenance release fixes critical GObject Introspection issue.
Without this release, any derived application or libra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: php5-midgard2
Version: 10.05.1
Author: Midgard Project
URL: http://www.midgard-project.org
License: LGPL
Description: Midgard2 Content Repository - PHP5 language bindings
Midgard2 is an Open Source Content Repository. It provides an
object-oriente
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: python-midgard2
Version: 10.05.1.1
Author: Midgard Project
URL: http://www.midgard-project.org
License: LGPL
Description: Python bindings for Midgard Content Repository
Midgard2 is an Open Source Content Repository. It provides an
object-oriented
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: midgard2-core
Version: 10.05.1.1
Author: Midgard Project
URL: http://www.midgard-project.org
License: LGPL
Description: Midgard Content Repository - Runtime Library
Midgard2 is an Open Source Content Repository. It provides an
object-oriented and
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
-Uploaders: @GNOME_TEAM@
+Uploaders: @GNOME_TEAM@, Piotr Pokora
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/libgda4/
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/libgda4/
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41),
@@ -19,7 +1
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
> On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote:
>> and removes uploader section.
>
> Why?
I thought it was supposed to be not NMU, which means maintainer is an
uploader.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
ELEASED; urgency=low
+libgda4 (4.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ]
* Build depend on libreadline-dev rather than libreadline5-dev.
@@ -7,8 +7,12 @@
[ Josselin Mouette ]
* Explicitly disable java.
- -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:43:33 +0200
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: midgard
Version: 9.09.2
Author: Midgard Project
URL: http://www.midgard-project.org
License: LGPL
Description:
Midgard2 is an Open Source Content Repository. It provides an
object-oriented and replicated environment for building data-intensive
appli
Josselin Mouette pisze:
>> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
>> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
>
> Same here. Why bump this dependency?
Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unstable. The
same applies to cdbs and libglib2.0-dev. It's absolutely safe from
upstre
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
> Hi Piotr,
Hi!
>> -Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41),
>> +Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.65),
>
>> - libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.16),
>> + libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.22),
>
>> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
>> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
>
> You didn't mention why you bumped these build
ew upstream release
+ * Removed duplicated libsqlite3-dev dependency from source package.
+ * Added nmu to debian version. Fixes: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
+
+ -- Piotr Pokora Wed, 28 Jan 2010 15:24:46 +0200
+
lib
37 matches
Mail list logo
