Raphael Geissert wrote:
> severity 506609 serious
> thanks
>
> MJ Ray wrote:
>
>> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> -legal: can a final concensus be reached on whether this licence is
>>> DFSG-free?
>> I'm happy to support
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00128.htm
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove axyl from the archive.
Axyl has been superceded by numerous CMS and Php development
platforms, and is hence obsolete. It has a reverse dependency
on axyl-lucene which is also subject of a removal request.
Cheers,
-- Paul.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove axyl-lucene from the archive. It is dependent on the axyl
package which is obsolete and which is itself the subject of a removal
request following this one.
Cheers,
-- Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: apollo
Version : 1.8.0
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
* License : GPL, Apache 2.0, CDDL 1.0, BSD, MIT
Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thijs,
>> If full purge isn't official policy, then the quick fix would be to remove
>> this functionality, entirely for now, and I'd be quite happy to do that.
>
> Upon a second look at the code, I can find a few more occurences of tempfile
> u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Paul Waite:
>
>> The requirement is to purge Axyl fully (apt-get remove --purge). For
>> that the postrm script needs to know the current locations of home,
>> data and logs which the use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Christian Perrier:
>
>> An easy and not too much invasive fix would be to copy the file in /root
>> instead of /tmp.
>
> Isn't this a policy violation?
It would be good to get clarification on this point.
Just to be sure e
Yep, it got accidentally removed - this will be fixed within the next
day or so - apologies to all inconvenienced!
Paul.
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Friday 26 January 2007, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> >
> > So, the unexisting command is also used in the (apparently) upstream
script
> > "install-luc
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: axyl-lucene
>
> Shouldn't the binary package be named libaxyl-lucene-java according to
> the Java policy?
I'm re-thinking the package structure to both axyl and axyl-lucene, so will
definitely be taking this option when I refactor it.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
Hi Laurent,
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: axyl
> Version: 2.1.7
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> the axyl package creates an "axyl" user on the system. This user is
> created with an UID that is greater than 1000. Aren't system users
> supposed to have an UID lower than 1000 ?
Well, I don't rea
Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: axyl-lucene
> Version: 2.1.4
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: axyl-lucene
Clytie, I'm getting a debconf warning viz:
> > Warning: Unknown default encoding for vi, get it from debian/po/vi.po:
> > utf-8 Warning: Unk
Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: axyl
> Version: 2.1.7
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: axyl
Clytie, I'm getting a debconf warning viz:
> > Warning: Unknown default encoding for vi, get it from debian/po/vi.po:
> > utf-8 Warning: Unknown default en
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the patch. This has already been noticed and addressed in
the 'axyl.templates' file as of 16/5/2005, however Axyl version 2.1.8 was
then delayed due to the roll-out of Sarge to stable.
Hence it didn't get out there as soon as normally. As it stands I am working
on a couple of
13 matches
Mail list logo
