Bug#660632: syntax file dircolors.vim - add keywords

2012-04-23 Thread Nikolai Weibull
OK, looks good. Bram, could you please apply the attached patch? Thank you! On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 14:08, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote: > Package: vim > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > The present syntax file (dated 23/6/2006) lacks a few keywords, which > are used in dircolors 8.13: > >

Bug#603503: numerous infelicities in git completion

2010-11-14 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On Sunday, November 14, 2010, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > On Sunday, November 14, 2010, Clint Adams wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:00:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >>> 1. git log completes only branches, but not filenames. I try to do >>>    `git log Foo/Bar` al

Bug#603503: numerous infelicities in git completion

2010-11-14 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On Sunday, November 14, 2010, Clint Adams wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:00:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >> 1. git log completes only branches, but not filenames. I try to do >>    `git log Foo/Bar` all the time. >> 2. git diff ditto Why don’t people file bugs upstream? I have no desire of c

Bug#428705: git reset HEAD completion not working

2007-06-13 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 6/13/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:15:23PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > git reset HEAD Co > > does not complete. It should probably get its data from the git > status output: > > # On branch master > # Changes to be committed: > # (use "git reset HE

Bug#384154: vim-common: error message pops up when viewing MetaPost files

2006-08-22 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/22/06, Matej Kosik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If more than one MetaPost (*.mp) file is opened with `vim', e.g. vim {1,2,3}.mp things seem to be fine. But if I switch from one buffer to some other, I see the following error (for a short while): Error detected while process

Bug#379942: zsh: rake completion doesn't work for tasks with colons in their names

2006-08-13 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/7/06, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Certainly. Attached (probably more than is relevant). > BTW, this is rake 0.7.1-1 from unstable and, as can be probably guessed, > the Rakefile comes from rails. See if this fixes it. Not quite. It presents you with the correct completions,