Hi,
So, with a random chunk order, a factor of 2 was expected,
which your figures confirm. The difference between the two
patch variants should be much smaller.
Well i think with the former I did a little more downloading.
So I can't make any conclusions from that.
Then I have to do a more con
Hi,
I have attached a different variant of the patch, which
I prefer because it should have less overhead.
Can you try it also ?
Yep that one works too.
Too bad, this is probably what I wanted, but your download
does not lead to measurable times. Good news for ntfs-3g
performance anyway. So
Hoi,
Thank you for testing. It confirms what I have found in the
meantime, and I have even found the cause.
I do not need the logs I asked, you can drop them.
Can you please try the attached patch over the latest
version 2013.1.13AR.4 ?
Done, no errors anymore.
And I would also like to kn
, but
libsfml-dev does not depend on them.
Should libsfml-dev depend on mesa-common-dev and libglu1-mesa-dev?
--
Niek Green
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kerne
4 matches
Mail list logo
