Package: amanda-common
Version: 1:3.5-1
The lexical taperscan algorithm is supposed to select the next volume to
use based on the lexical ordering of volume labels, but as implemented
in Amanda v3.5 it does not properly restrict the volume labels being
processed to those from the tape pool in que
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:36:46 -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> (Comparing those two files quickly I don't see any other obsolete option
> still listed in the Debian /etc/udhcpd.conf file.)
Actually, looking a little more closely it seems that this
Debian-specific file
Package: udhcpd
Version: 1:1.27.2-2
I noticed that the copy of /etc/udhcpd.conf installed by the udhcpd
package includes a section describing the "remaining" option:
=
# If remaining is true (default), udhcpd will store the time
# remaining for each lease in the udhcpd leases file. This is
#
> This seems to be yet another occurrence of
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781120 -- handling
> of non-readable directories on @INC
Just to pull together the various strands of this discussion: the issue
is that no StdHash.pm file actually exists, but Perl don't know that
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 15:16:30 -0400, Alain Choquet wrote:
> The error in systemd log is not caused by the APM option itself but by the
> failed attempt by hdparm to write output messages to a non existent output.
> On my system a command in /lib/udev/hdparm expands to
>
> /sbin/hdparm -B254 -q
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 08:35:00 -0400, Dominique Brazziel wrote:
> The error still exists here even after specifying
> '-B 255' because this WD Caviar drive does not
> support APM. I'll let upstream handle this.
I found that I could avoid the error by giving a blank "apm" value in
hdparm.conf,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 14:41:27 -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> I have only worked with this under Ubuntu (not Debian per se), but I
> believe the issue you are seeing is that the Shorewall documentation has
> not been updated to reflect the use of systemd instead of the old-sty
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 01:56:54 +0100, Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> At the moment all seems to work as expected, with an exception: the
> program doesn't start at the system boot; however I can run Shorewall with
> both
> `# service shorewall start` and `# shorewall start`.
>
> Please note that I set `
For what it's worth, Fedora just released their own fix to this problem,
as discussed in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234436
(The specific patch they implemented can be found here:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/chkrootkit.git/commit/?h=f23&id=82dd537b2fd88850eb4327a
00-fix_quote_readline_by_ref.patch was introduced in
bash-completion v1:2.1-3 as a fix for bug 739835 "filename completion
broken with bash 4.3".
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739835
The patch file was originally pulled from Ubuntu, where it was created
to fix two LP bugs:
*
Package: samba
Version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1
In the past when I upgraded my samba packages, the samba-common.postinst
script automatically copied my locally-defined shares from smb.conf onto
the end of the generated smb.conf.ucf-dist file... but recently I
noticed that's no longer happening.
Looking a
Attached is a suggested patch for the "max shares" entry in the
distributed smb.conf file.
Nathan
--- smb.conf.ucf-dist_trusty2014-10-28 14:44:30.031106772 -0400
+++ smb.conf_max-share_new 2015-01-25 12:15:00.345729305 -0500
@@ -178
The smb.conf.5 section for "max shares" currently says:
usershare max shares (G)
This parameter specifies the number of user defined shares that are
allowed to be created by users belonging to the group owning the
usershare directory. If set to zero (the de
Package: samba
Version: 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1
I was recently setting up Samba on a file server system running Ubuntu
Trusty, and as I was testing out my configuration I was surprised to find
error messages similar to
process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/test failed. No
such file o
Package: apt
Severity: minor
Version: 0.9.15.5
Near the top of /etc/cron.daily/apt, the documentation for the MaxSize
variable says:
# APT::Periodic::MaxSize "0"; (new)
# - Set maximum size of the cache in MB (0=disable). If the cache
#is bigger, cached package files are deleted until the s
For what its worth, the man page for logger v2.20.1 includes some warning
text about this issue:
Valid facility names are: auth, authpriv (for security information of a
sensitive nature), cron, daemon, ftp, kern (can't be generated from user
process) [...]
I recently ran into this bug, too (on an Ubuntu Precise system, running
bsdutils 1:2.20.1-1ubuntu3), and in my investigation discovered that a
similar patch has been applied upstream to fix this bug:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=86248cd28a27bdd9a437e3899
I don't have any personal experience with this bug, but according to
the following post, it was fixed in tar 1.24:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2012-10/msg00039.html
The patch referenced in that message is just one line, and can be found
at:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/tar.
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:58:57 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> the new dependency on virtual package rdoc pulls in transitional package ruby.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 19:29:58 -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> Doing so would presumably help avoid pulling in the "
(On a related note, "ruby-interpreter" is now provided by all the
available "ruby1.x" packages, so it should probably be safe to drop the
"ruby" half of the rake packages's "ruby | ruby-interpreter" dependency.
Doing so would presumably help avoid pulling in the "ruby" v4.8
transitional package
> the new dependency on virtual package rdoc pulls in transitional package ruby.
> I'm not sure if this package is to blame. But to me it seems the package rdoc
> and the versioned packages rdoc1.8 and rdoc1.9.1 are virtual packages provided
> by the ruby* packages. Therefore, the dependency on rub
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:09:22 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:44:15 PM Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > In short, I don't think the postinst should be creating an /etc/motd.tail
> > if one doesn't exist already.
>
> I do not completely understand this statement. Do you mean: posti
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:13:27 +0100, Nirgal Vourgère wrote:
> Support for TLS_CACERTDIR has been broken. See bug 513270
>
> I had a simmilar problem.
> Using an explicit TLS_CACERT with the specific crt/pem file works around.
Note that as it copies certificates into the /etc/ssl/certs director
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 19:31:30 +, Sam Morris wrote:
> I've tried running dosfslabel to change the label of a vfat filesystem. This
> seemed to work:
>
> # /sbin/dosfslabel /dev/sda1
> sam
>
> However, the change was not picked up by HAL. On investigation, it seems that
> this is because lib
Package: libdvdread
Severity: minor
I noticed that even in the very latest unstable version of this package (I
checked both the "copyright" link from the Package Tracking System page and
the Debian git repository), debian/copyright still gives only the Download:
URL for the old chalmers.se upstrea
d Base 3.2 init scrip
Versions of packages procps recommends:
ii psmisc22.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
procps suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway - na
Package: iftop
Version: 0.17-3
Severity: normal
When I use the -B command line option or the "use-bytes" config-file
option, most of the bandwidth rates on the screen change to bytes...
but the numbers in the top line of the screen do not.
A one-line patch to fix this problem was posted in the Ge
et so I am not able to confirm this
with an actual test.)
Nathan
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-Atlantic region
Ray Ontko & Co. - Software co
machine.
Nathan
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-Atlantic region
Ray Ontko & Co. - Software consulting services - http://www.ontko.com/
GPG Key: http://www.ontko.co
the raideng
segfault-after-finding-the-i2octl-device issue. As far as I could see
from the history, all the people who reported a device-file problem were
able to get past it (at least far enough to run into the segfault
problem). So hopefully if the patch does actually resolve #332229, then
bug
and so I'm thinking it might
make sense to separate this DPTI_startEataCp issue into a second Debian
bug.
Nathan
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-
o have run into it.
Nathan
p.s. I based my fix on the I2OGETIOPS documentation found in the
kernel Documentation/i2o/ioctl file, e.g.
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.18.5/Documentation/i2o/ioctl#L33
---
I noticed the following question from Otavio Salvador in the discussion
for bug #440161:
> I still fail to understand how i2o_block will work for your device if
> it's not registered for it on pcialias file ... that makes me worry
> about it.
I think the answer to the question is that the i2o_cor
Package: aptitude-doc-en
Version: 0.2.15.9-6bpo3
Severity: minor
I noticed that the table of default keybindings in the Aptitude table shows
that both NextPage and PrevPage are listed as bound to "pagedown,C-f".
Presumably, PrevPage should actually be listed as bound to "pageup,C-b".
I originally
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.7-1
Severity: normal
I just upgraded from Sarge to Etch, moving from cupsys 1.1.23-10sarge1 to
1.2.7-1 in the process.
I noticed that the /etc/cups/cupsd.conf distributed with 1.2.7-1 no longer
includes a Printcap line, and thus CUPS is now putting the printcap file i
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:55:49PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> I noticed that bug #401114 has been filed against the
> debian-archive-keyring package on this topic.
Please ignore the above message; it was sent to the wrong bug.
I noticed that bug #401114 has been filed against the
debian-archive-keyring package on this topic.
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed that bug #401114 has been filed against the
debian-archive-keyring package on this topic.
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2006.11.22
Severity: wishlist
It would be useful if the README file for debian-archive-keyring included a
little more information on how the package is "supposed' to function and how
one can "make use" of the keys it contains when that doesn't happen.
A fe
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
When I followed the instructions in the Sarge -> Etch release notes and run
"aptitude upgrade aptitude", that operation also brings in the causes the
"apt" package to be updated as well as installing the new
"debian-archive-keyring" package.
However, at l
ic release, and ignore
packages it finds that aren't in that release? Etc.)
Nathan
----
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-Atlantic region
Ray Ontko & Co. - Software cons
of packages smartmontools depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-Atlantic region
Ray
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:14:24PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:07:41PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> > Package: popularity-contest
> > Version: 1.28
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
> > I was interested in convertin
ends on:
ii ntp1:4.2.0a+stable-2 Network Time Protocol: network uti
ii ntp-simple 1:4.2.0a+stable-2 Network Time Protocol: daemon for
-- no debconf information
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway
ription of the and fields, or in the FAQ as a new
question).
Thanks.
Nathan
--------
Nathan Stratton Treadway - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mid-Atlantic region
Ray Ontko & Co.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:58:53PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> A related issue is the case where a program such as "integrit" updates
> the atime of all files in /bin and /usr (and elsewhere) each day.
[...]
> So, my point is that if you add special handling f
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.28
Severity: wishlist
I've been noticing the popularity-contest package/project mentioned
frequently on Debian mailing lists and similar places, and often those
messages mention "votes" for this or that package.
However, when I installed the package myself a
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:58:53PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> The issue is that all the atime values fall in a short range (e.g.
> 1108386315 - 1108384615 = 1700 sec < 30 minutes) and occur just before
> the runtime of popularity-contest itself.
>
>
> So, my
ot
like to have systems affected by this problem participating in the
program. Is it more helpful or harmful for these systems to be included
given their bogus "vote" counts?)
Nathan
---
49 matches
Mail list logo
