d understand your hesitation.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:16:42PM -0700, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> > The license stuff was never changed in the release branch of
> Bioconductor.
> > That all happened in the devel branch. Next month, wit
The license stuff was never changed in the release branch of Bioconductor.
That all happened in the devel branch. Next month, with the Bioc release,
the devel branch becomes the release branch, so I'm not sure it's worth
back porting right now.
Michael
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Andreas Til
Are you guys saying that an R package that depends on another R
package is considered a derivative work? If so, there are probably an
enormous number of CRAN/Bioc packages in violation. My choice of
license for rtracklayer should not affect the
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Charles Plessy wrot
Sorry accidentally hit send. Anyway, rtracklayer's license should not
affect the license of any of its dependencies. At least, the R
community has never taken that stance, as far as I know.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> Are you guys saying that an R pack
Would someone please clarify a series of steps that would lead to
favorable (for the world) resolution?
rtracklayer only uses the code in "src/lib" and "src/inc". Stuff for
reading/writing BigWig and 2bit files. It sounds like Jim would need
to choose a license that is more explicitly "free" than
Hi Dirk,
No, I don't have an Itanium around, unfortunately. Without that, it's tough
to say. Probably something to do with the GType arithmetic. On a 64 bit
system, I *think* a GType is a 64 bit integer, whereas in R we only have 52
bits from double. On most 64 bit architectures, it seems that the
OK you will need to use cairoDevice 2.6.1 with R 2.7 or above.
install.packages() should find it properly.
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 07:24:17PM -0700, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> > Which
On Nov 13, 2007 10:21 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Marco, (and Hi Hadley and Michael)
>
> Thanks for the bugreport -- much appreciated.
>
> On 13 November 2007 at 15:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | Package: ggobi
> | Severity: wishlist
> |
> | Please add Ubuntu patch to
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:59 -0600, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> How reproducible is this bug? Did you try to rm() the ggobi references
> from the R session?
start R inside ESS
g<-ggobi(data)
4.7M = total reported by interactive xrestop
close(g)
4.6M
rm(g)
4.6M
g2<-ggobi(data)
9.3
How reproducible is this bug? Did you try to rm() the ggobi references from
the R session?
On 2/23/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike, Hadley,
Fresh bug report from Ross. I am not sure what value I can add here. If
you
can think of anything, let me know.
Dirk
On 23 Februa
10 matches
Mail list logo
