Bug#884635: transition: libupnp

2018-10-03 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
0/01/2018 11:33 PM, Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote: > > If I can help further, please do contact me. > > I started to port gmrender-resurrect to 1.8, but I think there are a few > code parts that won't work with 1.8, but that might also be me not > understanding the data model

Bug#884635: transition: libupnp

2018-10-01 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
Hi, Unfortunately, there is no porting guide. But the good news is that the new API is pretty much straight forward and I can summarize it here. It is much easier to use than it is to explain, but here it goes: You no longer have pointers to data structures. All the pointers have been substituted

Bug#868936: vlc: port to libupnp-1.8

2017-08-03 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
Committed. Regards, Marcelo. On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On 07/31/2017 04:16 PM, Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote: > > The request to make both libs coexist is much older. I don't have the > > links here, but the 1.8 branch is

Bug#868936: vlc: port to libupnp-1.8

2017-07-31 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
14:50, Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote: > > I personally don't like that change of names. I agree that it is not the > > proper way to do it. It was done as a temporary hack to allow both libs > > to be installed. Since libupnp 1.8 is finally advancing, this should no > &

Bug#868936: vlc: port to libupnp-1.8

2017-07-31 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
Hi, I personally don't like that change of names. I agree that it is not the proper way to do it. It was done as a temporary hack to allow both libs to be installed. Since libupnp 1.8 is finally advancing, this should no longer be the case. So, I think libupnp should come back to the proper namin

Bug#813249: [PATCH upnp] miniserver: fix binding to ipv6 link-local addresses

2016-12-08 Thread Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
Hi Uwe, I can't look at the matter right now, but I can commit it. I had already applied the one you sent me earlier, is this one supposed to go on top of the last one or instead of the last one. I must say I liked the comment "You wonder why there is a +1?" :) Regards, Marcelo. On Thu, Dec 8,