Hi,
While updating to dianara 1.4.1, I am trying to fix this bug.
> I've noticed that Dianara, as of 1.4.0-1 still depends on libqca2-plugin-ossl,
> which is a dummy package depending on libqca2-plugins, which are qt4-based,
> and
> cause libqtcore4 to be installed.
>
> This is a remnant of the
On 31/08/17 02:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On 30 August 2017 at 18:49, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 30/08/17 23:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> >> Control: severity -1 serious
> >>
> >>
Hi!
On 30/08/17 23:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi! I have just uploaded qoauth to unstable thus starting the transition. I
> don't mind nmuing dianara, feel free to ask me so. I'll do it if I don't get
> any answer in ~2 days.
Sorry for the d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: django-ckeditor
Version : 5.2.2
* Upstream Author : Shaun Sephton
URL : https://github.com/django-ckeditor/django-ckeditor
License : 3-Clause BSD License
Django CKEd
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: slick
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : Ken Wheeler
* URL : http://kenwheeler.github.io/slick/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Javascript
dfsg1/debian/changelog 2017-01-14 15:31:49.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libxml2 (2.9.4+dfsg1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix attribute decoding during XML schema validation
+(Closes: #832602, #832864)
+
+ -- Mònica Ramírez Arceda Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:
backports.
So, this bug is still open until migration is done after freeze.
Cheers,
Mònica
Hi,
This bug is affecting xmlstarlet (see RC bug #832864). I could disable
two tests to make xmlstaret build but I would prefer not to do it. Are
you planning to fix it before freeze date (2017 Feb 5)?
Thanks!
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:13:16 +0200 Andre Naujoks wrote:
> Package: libxml2
> Version:
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> Mónica: you should now be able to drop the patch.
Patch dropped! It builds and works for me :-)
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/dianara.git
> Hi!
>
> I've tested this (on two i386 Sid machines) and have some feedback.
>
> Dianara uses qmake as the buildsystem, so it relies on a oauth.prf spec
> file, which was missing in the Qt4 version of libqoauth-dev[1], but is
> present now.
> The problem is that this oauth.prf file needs some adap
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On miércoles, 19 de octubre de 2016 8:28:34 A. M. ART Mònica Ramírez Arceda
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> I understand that you will tell me when qoauth is in experimental so I
>> can test if dianara
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016 9:42:16 A. M. ART Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Hi! The only two consumers of QOauth are dianara and choqok. I would like
>> > to switc
Hi,
> Hi! The only two consumers of QOauth are dianara and choqok. I would like to
> switch Choqok and QOauth to qt5, so if we can coordinate to also get Dianara
> updated to https://jancoding.wordpress.com/2016/10/ and use QOauth-qt5 I can
> remove qt4's qoauth at the same time.
Yes, of course.
Hi,
The package does not build because it does not pass two tests related to
schemas:
>> FAIL: examples/schema1
>> FAIL: examples/valid1
I am afraid that the problem is a libxml2 bug detailed here: #832864
I have built xmlstarlet against libxml2=2.9.1+dfsg1-5+deb8u1 (previous
version in Debian)
Hi,
I can confirm this bug. Using a file with 5 new users I get the
following error:
# newusers 5users.csv
*** Error in `newusers': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ae2d10
***
Aborted
A curious detail: if the first 4 users are already created and I run
newusers, the 5th one is ad
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the splitvt package.
The package description is:
A utility to split a vt100 compatible screen into two halves, upper and
lower, and run a different program simultaneously in each half.
The package state is ok: it is lintian free, although it has
#x27;,
'd1620ade010bf41d89d182dc1b19822aa1e0a8bd']
gbp:debug: Determined compression type 'gzip'
gbp:info: Building with (cowbuilder) for sid
gbp:debug: git-pbuilder [] []
Building with cowbuilder for distribution sid
I: using cowbuilder as pbuilder
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/neutron-lbaas
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/golang-codegangsta-cli
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libsoldout
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], objeck-lang-i386 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
#775946 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.o
Noam Postavsky writes:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
>>
>> Noam: Pleae, could you review if I am breaking something?
>
> This would break attempts to ./configure with libxml or libxslt in
> non-standard location, i.e., --with-lib(xml|xslt)-pre
if I am breaking something?
Thank you both!
commit eef9f5c27016fbe809c9f51bb21d6bbad56e6887
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Date: Mon Sep 15 15:03:02 2014 +0200
Remove -L/usr/lib from build system.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6481698..b4561e8 100644
--- a/d
Logan Rosen writes:
> Package: gtkhash
> Version: 0.7.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #744589
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
>
> * Use dh-autoreconf instead of aut
xmlstarlet FTBFS on mips
Yes, it seems there is a problem in fop package with mips that causes
that xmlstarlet can't build. See #709950 and #712885.
Thanks for reporting bugs,
Mònica
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
El dj 03 de 10 de 2013 a les 11:51 +0200, en/na Emmanuel Bourg va
escriure:
> Le 03/10/2013 11:12, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit :
>
> > I hope gpsprune will build with this new version of
> > libmetadata-extractor-java. If not, I can contact gpsprune upstream to
> >
Hi gregor!
> Package: dianara
> Version: 0.9-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> Hi Mònica,
>
> sorry, bad bug report ahead :)
>
> Since I'm using dianara [0], it's usually running for days,
> with suspend/hibernate in between, until I reboot
Hi gregor!
El dc 30 de 10 de 2013 a les 23:25 +0100, en/na gregor herrmann va
escriure:
> Package: dianara
> Version: 0.9-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch upstream
>
> Hi Mònica!
>
> I was missing a keyboard shortcut for quitting dianara; the Session
> menu only
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 13:58 +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 20:29 +0100, deb...@activityworkshop.net wrote:
> > Thanks, Michael, for doing the investigative work!
> >
> > At the moment it looks like there's nothing we can do
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 14:45 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Updating libmetadata-extractor-java to 2.6.x will also require an upload
> of gpsprune (See #717638).
I hope gpsprune will build with this new version of
libmetadata-extractor-java. If not, I can contact gpsprune upstream to
see if he is
on 6238, please update this package.
New josm upstream version depends on libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6.1.
libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6.1 is now in experimental [0], hopefully
it'll be uploaded to unstable soon, and we'll be able to build and
upload josm new version as well (see #725186 [1]
!
Mònica
[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/josm.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
eproduce this bug
in Debian sid. If anybody can't reproduce it, I'll close the bug.
Thanks for reporting bugs!
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 10:39 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mònica Ramírez Arceda writes:
>
> > This command is still not working for me :-(
>
> > According to git-pbuilder man page, I must retitle mybase.cow to
> > base-mybase.cow. When I retitle the image, gi
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 09:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mònica Ramírez Arceda writes:
>
> > I would like to use a customized cowbuilder image when running
> > git-buildpackage. If I try to pass the location of this image to
> > --git-pbuilder-options, git-buildpackage
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.6.2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I would like to use a customized cowbuilder image when running git-buildpackage.
If I try to pass the location of this image to --git-pbuilder-options,
git-buildpackage
continues using base.cow instead of the file I want to use.
retitle 649287 RFP: tomahawk-player -- multi-source social media player
thanks
Hi,
I'm retitling the name of this package since there is another package with the
same name which is going to be uploaded to Debian archive soon
(http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/tomahawk_0.6.0-1.html). Feel free to
ra-v?(\d.*?)(?:-src)?\.(?:tgz|tbz2|tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz))
Cheers,
Mònica
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], sosreport has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717931
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
According to [0], feincms-elephantblog has not its corresponding ITP bug,
despite 717733 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
According to [0], curseofwar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717262
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
According to [0], goodbye has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 716905
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
a .deb package, but I don't know if it was made
> correctly, so it would be likely better if it was packaged by someone
> who understand it better.
So, this is a RFP :)
Thanks for filing this bug!
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
What is bug 715315 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], rekonq has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
Cheers,
Mònica
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks a lot for all your xsol patches :-)
I'll review and hopefully apply them in the next upload, as well as
doing the transition to libmotif-dev as you suggest.
Thanks again,
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
According to [0], simplenat has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
According to [0], ctesf has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712799 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
According to [0], distkeys has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
According to [0], ctesf-console has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
712805 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
According to [0], orientdb has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712806
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x1f0a160)',
'requester', 'Mònica Ramírez Arceda ',
'request_addr', 'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid',
'<20130612200241.ga16...@debian
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#638825) and is owned by Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
.
I'm merging these two bugs and setting Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
as the owner.
Please, contact Praveen Arimbrathodiyil to see if he's
still working on this package
or if he wants to comaintain this package with y
El dl 27 de 05 de 2013 a les 14:41 +0200, en/na Mathieu Malaterre va
escriure:
> # as per OP report
> found 709950 1:1.1.dfsg-2
> thanks
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
> > found 709950 1:1.0.dfsg2-6
> > thanks
> ...
> > So, it fai
found 709950 1:1.0.dfsg2-6
thanks
El dl 27 de 05 de 2013 a les 13:37 +0200, en/na Mathieu Malaterre va
escriure:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
> >> $ fop -xml xmlstarlet-man.xml
the same error:
$ fop -xml xmlstarlet-man.xml -xsl xmlstar-fodoc-style.xsl -pdf xmlstarlet.pdf
Exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid profile data
#580333 was a similar bug found in fop/1:0.95.dfsg-11 and was fixed in
fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-2.
It seems there is a regression in fop/1:
retitle 709328 RFP: berek -- the berek button, reporting breach of the EU
cookie law to your national regulatory authority
thanks
El dg 26 de 05 de 2013 a les 11:36 +0200, en/na Erik Josefsson va
escriure:
> On 05/26/2013 11:04 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > Hi,
>
&g
Hi,
El dg 26 de 05 de 2013 a les 07:40 +0200, en/na Erik Josefsson va
escriure:
> Hello,
>
> I just saw that the suggested change in the title from "the
> BEREC-button" to "the berek button".
>
> Please change it back to BEREC.
Sorry for changing the title with a wrong name. Debian package name
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/gmsl
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
owner 657791 Georges Khaznadar
merge 657791 705972
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 00:34 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:02:13PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > Hello Mònica,
> > thank you for your scrutiny!
> >
> > Hello Mohamed,
>
Hi,
There was already another ITP for qupzilla (#657791), although it's an old one
and may be abandoned. Could you contact Mohammed Sameer
and ask him/her if he/she wants to abandon or co-maintain this package with you?
Once you've done this, you should set the right owner in both bugs and mer
retitle 705735 ITP: pyscss -- a Scss compiler for Python
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 23:34 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2013-04-20 12:42, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
> > not the same pac
Hi,
There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
not the same package. One of the two names should be changed.
Could you change this package name or contact #694731 submitter and
decide what names are the best for these two packages?
Thanks for your work!
signature.
Hi,
I've just retitled #705129 as it seems to be an ITP. Please, feel free
to fix the owner if it is not the correct one.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
both bugs and
merge them.
Thanks for your work!
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], freeplane has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite 704789
title.
In fact, freeplane package is not orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/freeplane
You may get in touch with freeplane maintainer and ask him if he wants to
orphan this package or co-maintain it with you.
retitle 704105 ITP: desktop-base-oldies -- packages containing theming from
past releases’ desktop-base package
severity 704105 wishlist
owner 704105 Paul Tagliamonte
thanks
Hi,
I'm fixing 704105 title, owner and severity, but I'm not 100% sure
if the package name and the owner are ok, so plea
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#697236) and is owned by Oleg Gashev
.
I'm merging these two bugs and setting Oleg Gashev as the
owner.
Please, contact Oleg Gashev to see if he's still working on
this package
or if he wants to comaintain this package with you.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
What is bug 702586 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
What is bug 702584 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], tilda has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite #702072
title.
#583248 and #695574 show that this package is not being maintained,
but I think you should get in contact with MIA Team to ask
them to orphan tilda. Then, you could adopt it with the correspondign ITA bug.
Thank
org
at testbts.pl line 8
In fact, I use decscripts in my program. When using devscripts:
use warnings;
use lib '/usr/share/devscripts';
use Devscripts::Debbugs;
my $bug_log = Devscripts::Debbugs::bug_log(491723);
print $bug_log;
I get:
Error while retrieving bug log from SOAP server: 200 OK
Cheers,
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El dj 28 de 02 de 2013 a les 20:02 +0400, en/na
programmer11...@programist.ru va escriure:
> 28.02.2013, 13:18, "Mònica Ramírez Arceda" :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is bug 701828 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a
> > "requ
Hi,
What is bug 701828 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
El dl 25 de 02 de 2013 a les 23:39 +0530, en/na NiTiSH va escriure:
> Is is "intent to package" (ITP).
> How will I retitle
You should send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with the following
body content (replacing package_name and package_description with the
corresponding values):
retitle 701
Hi Thomas,
This ITP already exists (#698159) and is owned by James Page
. I'm merging these two bugs and setting James Page
as the owner.
Please, contact James Page to see if he's still working
on this package or if he wants to comaintain this package with you.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
What is bug 701535 meant for? Is it an "intent to package" (ITP)? Or a "request
for package" (RFP)?
You should retitle it with the following format:
ITP|RFP: package_name -- package_description
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
El dg 17 de 02 de 2013 a les 23:48 +0100, en/na Jakub Wilk va escriure:
> Hi Mònica,
>
> * Mònica Ramírez Arceda , 2013-02-17, 23:36:
> >+On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the BSD
> >+License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD'.
>
>
# package libjreen: bugs ITP 648668 and ITP 700031 have different owners
owner 700031 QutIM Packagers Team
# package libjreen: bugs ITP 648668 and ITP 700031 are not merged
merge 648668 700031
thanks
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#648668) and is owned by QutIM Packagers Team
. I'm merging these t
# bug 697778 has subject RFP: VLC Python ctypes bindings
retitle 697778 RFP: libvlc-bindings-python -- VLC Python ctypes bindings
thanks
I'm retitling this bug to give a name to the new requested package. Feel
free to change it if you prefer another name.
Regards.
signature.asc
Description: Thi
Hi,
There is already a package dtc in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/dtc
But it is not the same pachage that you are trying to package.
You should rename your pakage and retitle this bug.
Regards.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# package ruby-fuubar: bugs ITP 624634 and ITP 697259 have different owners
owner 697259 Nilam Kadale
# package ruby-fuubar: bugs ITP 624634 and ITP 697259 are not merged
merge 624634 697259
thanks
Hi,
This ITP already exists (#624634) and is owned by Nilam Kadale
.
I'm merging these two bugs a
Hi,
Is this report a RFP (request for a package) or an ITP (intend to
package) report? The type of report should appear in the title.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# ITP missing for package wsgiproxy at mentors
retitle 691518 ITP: wsgiproxy -- HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps
owner 691518 Mikhail Lukyanchenko
thanks
This package is in mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wsgiproxy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], there is not the corresponding ITP bug for this
package. You should file it and close it in your debian/changelog file.
Thanks!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian
Hi,
I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian
(experimental):
http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/eclipse-subclipse
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Hector,
There is already a package haskell-pcap in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-pcap.html
Since I suppose it's the same package you want to ITP,
you should close this bug :)
Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El dg 11 de 11 de 2012 a les 14:57 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
escriure:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
> > El ds 10 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:40 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
> > escriure:
> >> >> >> * Package name: plu
El ds 10 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:40 +0100, en/na Maxime Hadjinlian va
escriure:
> >> >> * Package name: plum
Another package already in Debian is named plum:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/plum
So, it must be changed.
> Now the dumb question, to change the description, what do I do ? I
> wasn
forcemerge 691897 691280
thanks
Hi Markus,
There is another previous ITP for ruby-subexec reported by Harshad
Waghmar. Maybe you could join efforts.
I'm merging #691897 and #691280 and setting Harshad Waghmar as the owner
because he was the first in reporting the ITP. Feel free to change this
if
Package: mawk
Version: 1.3.3-17
Severity: normal
Hi,
$ cat mawk-backslash-error.awk
!/^#/ {
gsub(/'\\'/, "''");
print;
}
$ echo "'\'" | /usr/bin/mawk -f mawk-backslash-error.awk
'\'
If I use gawk:
$ echo "'\'" | /usr/bin/gawk -f mawk-backslash-error.awk
'\\'
This issue has been
Hi,
El dc 24 de 10 de 2012 a les 20:47 -0400, en/na drew craig va escriure:
> required for Debian Packaging of Diaspora.
> This request is a resend of an earlier request.
Do you mean this is a RFP (request for package) instead of ITP (intent
to package)?
Regards.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Pekko,
If you're looking for a sponsor you should send [0] to
sub...@bugs.debian.org to generate a new bug against
sponsorship-requests.
Thanks for taking care of ovito!
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674283#10
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
According to [0], szg has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #691270
title. Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is
needed because jampal has been removed from Debian.
If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP
bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencie
Hi,
According to [0], fvwm has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
#689441 title.
Please, could you file this ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree has not its
corresponding ITP bug, despite #689167 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
1 - 100 of 599 matches
Mail list logo
