-ractions -s skel $<
-flexml-act.c: flexml-act.l
+flexml-act.h flexml-act.c: flexml-act.l
$(FLEX) -B -s -v -oflexml-act.c flexml-act.l
flexml-act.o: flexml-act.c flexml-act.h
Lucas
)include/swircpaths.h $(OBJS)
$(RM) $(RECOMPILE)
$(Q) strip --strip-symbol=main $(SRC_DIR)main.o
Best,
Lucas
N_DIR)
@echo "- Building main bedtools binary."
$(CCPREFIX) $(CC_WRAPPER) $(CXX) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) -o $(BIN_DIR)/bedtools
$(BUILT_OBJECTS) $(HTSDIR)/libhts.a $(ALL_LIBS)
Best,
Lucas
Source: libcache-memcached-fast-perl
Version: 0.28-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila
Source: ddir
Version: 2025.0129-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.d
Source: brltty
Version: 6.7-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.debia
p; $(ln) \
This should really be applied to Makefile.am (and then propagate to
Makefile.in).
Lucas
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen
Version: 32
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, a
Source: golang-collectd
Version: 0.5.0+git20240104.26404de-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it b
Source: kissplice
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: crimson
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: emacs
Version: 1:30.1+1-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes i
Source: openclonk
Version: 8.1-4
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: golang-github-lestrrat-go-backoff
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it bui
Source: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.10.0-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and som
Source: mdanalysis
Version: 2.9.0-7
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: gittuf
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: puppetserver
Version: 8.7.0-4
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometim
Source: qtcontacts-sqlite
Version: 0.3.20-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and s
Source: haskell-stm-delay
Version: 0.1.1.1-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and
Source: ovn
Version: 25.03.0-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it f
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.13.3-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: agenda.app
Version: 0.47-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: puppetlabs-http-client-clojure
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds
Source: dovecot-antispam
Version: 2.0+20171229-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -DHAV
Source: compyle
Version: 0.8.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: fiat-ecmwf
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-
Source: ruby-spy
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: lvm2
Version: 2.03.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: email-reminder
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: rtpengine
Version: 12.5.1.30-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering di
Source: metview
Version: 5.25.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-pa
Source: snek
Version: 1.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/14.
Source: rtorrent
Version: 0.9.8-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for working nc
Source: flowgrind
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Wall -Wextra -Werror
Source: rdkit
Version: 202503.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> pg_
Source: perlimports
Version: 0.56-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: ecmwflibs
Version: 2:0.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: ruby-android-key-attestation
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: ectrans
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /lib/x86_64-l
Source: xmlgraphics-commons
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: metkit
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-pat
Source: fdb
Version: 5.15.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-path/
Source: libsys-cpuload-perl
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-serialp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-serialport
Please unblock package ruby-serialport.
This package was removed from testing a while back. Howev
that brings that to Incus. (See https://github.com/lnussbaum/incant/)
Also Incus has an image for Debian trixie uploaded on a regular basis
(daily I think).
Lucas
Please, mark the appropriate packages as affected. If this affecting ruby3.1 in
stable, make that clear. If it is affecting ruby3.3, make it clear too. If it
is ruby-defaults, state so.
Thanks!
On 24/04/25 at 17:11 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > ruby-shou
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
> > ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
> > ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
&
ulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
Lucas
+characters. It causes an increase in execution time for parsing strings
+to URI objects.
+ - d/p/CVE-2023-28755.patch
+
+ -- Lucas Kanashiro Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:54:07 -0300
+
rubygems (3.3.15-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
diff -Nru rubygems-3.3.15/debian/patches/CVE-2023
ported by our tooling yet).
All of them are not in testing because they do not build with ruby3.3.
Let's remove them all from unstable and move on with the ruby3.1
removal.
Cheers,
Lucas Kanashiro.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: severity 104 serious
Hi,
On 27/05/24 at 22:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An update on this:
>
> I plan to take care of the Debian vagrant package (in the framework of
> the Ruby team, as this is currently done). I uploaded the latest free
>
On 17/04/25 at 10:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 17 April 2025 at 09:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | | > Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to
On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 April 2025 at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | | On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | | >
> | | > On 16 April 2025 at
Hi Paul,
On 17/04/25 at 09:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> [Release Team member hat on]
>
> I always appreciate your QA work on rebuilding Debian, but I'm wondering
> what the value is of filing out-of-memory FTBFS bugs o
d on? if
> you have less than 4g per core, the build will currently fail.
16 GB total, 4 cores (so exactly 4 GB per core)
Lucas
llelism being used in the build log?
>
> Maybe this should not be RC,
Yes
> but in either case it might be worth
> to be investigated more.
I'll do my next ARM rebuild with more RAM.
Lucas
On 17/04/25 at 06:07 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:40:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: firefox-esr
> > Version: 128.9.0esr-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian
On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | Source: rjava
> | Version: 1.0-11-1
> | Severity: serious
> | Justification: FTBFS
> | Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> | User: lu...@debian.org
> | Usertags:
Source: freecontact
Version: 1.0.21-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]
Source: rjava
Version: 1.0-11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> archiver:
Source: java3d
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libmypaint
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: E
Source: libkolabxml
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: gfan
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: fwupd
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Iplugins/mo
Source: dosbox-x
Version: 2025.02.01+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gc
Source: selint
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: r-cran-webgestaltr
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: mdanalysis
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> testsuite/
Source: openvdb
Version: 10.0.1-2.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: E
Source: thunderbird
Version: 1:128.9.0esr-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: python-msgspec
Version: 0.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debi
Source: kicad
Version: 9.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: E
Source: firefox-esr
Version: 128.9.0esr-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: ceph
Version: 18.2.4+ds-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: En
Source: mdds
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[8]: Entering
Source: r-cran-dbitest
Version: 1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian
Source: etlcpp
Version: 20.39.4+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /buil
On 15/04/25 at 11:47 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 4/14/25 17:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > My logic here is: arch:all can be used on all architectures. It's not
> > always easy, from a build failure, to understand if failing to build
> > translates to failing to wor
Source: pytest-regressions
Version: 2.5.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: r-cran-lubridate
Version: 1.9.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: terminaltexteffects
Version: 0.12.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: rosbags
Version: 0.10.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: golang-github-henrydcase-nobs
Version: 0.1+git20200305.7d891c7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Rel
Hi,
On 14/04/25 at 16:35 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not the maintainer, but having two questions:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: gnocchi
> > Version: 4.6.5-1
>
> > During a rebuild of al
Source: r-cran-rstanarm
Version: 2.32.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: golang-github-teris-io-shortid
Version: 1.0+git20171029.771a37c-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Re
Source: r-cran-themis
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/
Source: r-cran-tidyverse
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: golang-github-xorcare-pointer
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefu
Source: damo
Version: 2.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
t code
> 101
> Marked Bug as done
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
If rust-imagepipe does not build on i386, maybe you could keep the bug
open with severity=wishlist and tag=wontfix, just to keep track of it in
a more visible way?
Lucas
Source: libbioparser-dev
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: valijson
Version: 1.0.3+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3
Source: parallel-hashmap
Version: 1.4.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /u
Source: eigen3
Version: 3.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
> /build/re
Source: golang-google-api
Version: 0.61.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-wide
Version: 0.7.32-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rul
1 - 100 of 10304 matches
Mail list logo