://www.musl-libc.org/ <https://www.musl-libc.org/>*
Kind regards
Kevin Bortis
I am not able to upload a copy of sabotage linux kernel headers due to
debian policy. In the current state it is very unlikly that the
official debian linux kernel maintainers are willing to provide the
appropriate sanitized headers under the musl libc folder.
Please see also debian bug 764335 for
Both find and ldd supply the correct information. It seems that you are on
a glibc based system. In this case ldd belongs to the glibc-gcc-binutils
package which is not compatible with the musl binaries. On glibc based
systems the musl package provides the command musl-ldd which should work
correct
I am planning to incorporate your changes in the upcoming 1.1.9 release of
musl. Unfortunately I am not able to get it in sooner.
The link is needed for various tools that expect a link or the real
libc.so be available in the same location as the includes and other
resources. One prominent member is musl-gcc from the musl-tools
package, which would fail to dynamic link to the correct libc.so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
The bug was fixed by upstream gcc and is now found in the GCC-4.9 source
tree.
Upstream bug report: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144
Upstream patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/varpool.c?r1=215896&r2=215895&pathrev=215896
Hi Michael
In general it is not wise for simple user space program to use files under
linux. musl-gcc was designed to compile simple C programs without the
hassle of installing a full cross compiler.
Since musl does, unlike glibc, NOT depend on any linux-headers, you are
free to use your own set
musl 1.1.4 was submitted some minutes ago, which will resolve all
pending known issues. This will fix the bug described.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This bug is known and was fixed in musl 1.1.1. Unfortunatly musl does
not build at the moment on unstable and testing, because of a serious
gcc-4.9.0 bug #748681, that is not fixed yet. Chances are there, that
it will get fixed by upstream gcc-4.9.1. Until then, musl-1.1.0-1 is
also suffering from
The musl package 1.1.2 is packaged and ready for upload. Unfortunatly
Debian unstable has switched to gcc-4.9 as their default compiler,
which introduces a serious bug in weak alias constant folding. A
possible patch is attached to the upstream gcc bug, but is currently
not applied or reviewed by t
Package: gcc
Version: 4.9
Severity: important
Tags: upstream,confirmed,sid,experimental
GCC 4.9 introduced a bug in optimization (present at all -O levels
except -O0) in the presence of extern objects with weak definitions
local to the translation unit.
The following minimal testcase shows the pr
This bug will be fixed with the introduction of musl_1.0.0-1 upwards.
There is now a global link /usr/bin/musl-ldd that can be invoked with
musl-ldd
If you still prefer to access the ldd functionality via the command ldd,
then follow the instructions found under:
http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/F
That bug is a tricky one.
Explanation for other readers: musl libc has no standalone ldd as glibc
has. Instead it uses /lib/ld-musl-*.so.1 as runtime and ldd. The suggested
way by the musl folks is to create a local symlink e.g. 'ln -s
/lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 ldd'. By running the symlink named ld
The musl wrapper only works for fairly simple packages. It would not be
correct to suggest, that musl-gcc provides a complete cross toolchain like
arm-linux-musleabihf-gcc. We strongly suggest to use musl-cross (
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross) for such purpose. Eventually I
will provide
I will mark the runtime package musl multi-arch: same on the musl 0.9.15
package.
According to debian policy, packages including headers are not allowed to
specify mulit-arch: same, even if no conflict would happen. So the package
musl-dev will not be changed.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Sh
The problem: All official Debian arches are eglibc based. So musl will
never provide libc-dev for them. The main reason why the musl debian
package exists is for bootstrapping a new debian port
"musl-linux-armhf" which is already supported by dpkg. For that arch
musl is providing the libc-dev packa
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Since musl is a libc that depends on linux and only fully supports
certain architectures, I would like to remove the package musl from
them, since I explicitly only allow armel, armhf, i386, amd64, mips &
mipsel since version 0.9.14.
So please delete any p
architectures
* Point to new homepage in control file (Closes: #724277)
* Revorked debian/rules
* Solved possible problem with postrm script (Closes: #724247)
I would appreciate if someone could upload the package.
Regards,
Kevin Bortis
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
Hi
I have revorked the debian/copyright file according to the additional
comments given by Paul Richards Tagliamonte (FTP Master).
Work done:
* Incorporated all copyright info given from upstream in their copyright file
* grep over complete source tree for the term "Copyright" and
controlled
to answer.
Thanks in advance
Kevin Bortis
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> thanks for working on the package. Generally it looks
> good and almost ready for uploading. Some minor notes:
>
> - Remove Readme.Debian, it is useless.
Done
&g
/wermut/musl
The repository follows the guideline found under
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit
Thanks in advance
Kevin Bortis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ound under
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit
Regards,
Kevin Bortis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Repository: https://github.com/wermut/musl
Release tag: https://github.com/wermut/musl/tree/debian/0.9.13-1
Works with musl-0.9.13:
http://www.musl-libc.org/releases/musl-0.9.13.tar.gz
PS: I still need a sponsor for this package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
Repository: https://github.com/wermut/musl
Release tag: https://github.com/wermut/musl/tree/debian/0.9.11-1
Works with musl-0.9.11:
http://www.musl-libc.org/releases/musl-0.9.11.tar.gz
https://github.com/wermut/musl
https://github.com/wermut/musl.git
Works currently with musl-0.9.10:
http://www.musl-libc.org/releases/musl-0.9.10.tar.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kevin Bortis
* Package name: musl
Version : 0.9.10
Upstream Author : Rich Felker
* URL : http://www.musl-libc.org
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : musl standard C library
musl is lightweight
26 matches
Mail list logo
