On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:17:42 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
Control: tags -1 patch
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 07:21:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
> >...
> > ntpsec (1.2.3+dfsg1-4) unstable; urgency=low
> >...
> >* Backport armhf fixes (Closes: 1091303)
> >...
>
> The problem stil
Package: virtualbox
Version: 7.0.20-dfsg-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-am...@lists.debian.org, ken...@xdump.org
User: debian-am...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: amd64
Dear Maintainer,
* What led
Control: tags -1 patch
It might be fixed by:
diff -ur t-code-2.3.1.orig/lisp/tc-mkmzdic.el
t-code-2.3.1/lisp/tc-mkmzdic.el ---
t-code-2.3.1.orig/lisp/tc-mkmzdic.el2002-09-26
11:22:50.0 +0900 +++ t-code-2.3.1/lisp/tc-mkmzdic.el
2025-03-11 12:50:23.0 +0900 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @
At least, I can reproduce using snapshot.d.o (JST)
* http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20250306T21Z
* able to login budgie-desktop
* http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20250307T00Z
* failed to login budgie-desktop
In these time frame, GNOME components such as gnome-sh
Package: budgie-desktop
Version: 10.9.2-7
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Can't login to budgie-desktop environment.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
1. Install budgie-desktop
2. Switch from GNOME t
Control: severity -1 normal
I've got that when installing Debian with bridge mode with WiFi
interface on Virtualbox guest,
IPv6 connectivity was broken unexpectedly.
This bug was well-known and not fixed for a long time.
Bridge mode with WiFi interface: IPv6 does not work via router
This bug occurs with the following conditions are met:
1. IPv4 and IPv6 was configured with netcfg
2. But, IPv6 connectivity is something broken
3. choose-mirror uses wget without timeout
In above case, wget tries to connect with IPv6
first and timeout when 900 seconds has passed.
The default t
Hi,
Surely it might be region specific or temporary issue.
According to
Debian mirror status [1], mirrors.xtom.jp was timed-out
at that time, but it was resolved now.
I've tried again and this issue is still reproducible even though mirror
status was resolved.
[1] https://mirror-master.debian.o
Control: severity -1 important
I hope this bug will be fixed in trixie.
Regards,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:24:50 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:13:24 +0100 Cyril Brulebois
> wrote:
> ...
> > > if I had a knowledge about d-i internals. :-<
> >
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20241227
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
* What led up to the situation?
Tested with weekly build image (2025-02-24)
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-
amd
Control: fixed -1 15.0.2+dfsg-2
This bug was fixed in groonga-15.0.2+dfsg-2, but forgot to mention in
debian/changelog.
Regards,
It seems that already reported to upstream.
https://github.com/k-takata/Onigmo/issues/169
Regards,
long mess
* More work on cross long long
I hope it will help.
Regards,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:29:39 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
>
> It seems that this issue was fixed in upstream.
> (#832 was closed via it)
>
>
> https://gitlab.com/N
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
It seems that this issue was fixed in upstream.
(#832 was closed via it)
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/commit/889138ca3952e64ecef830e03e88f890a49df466
Regards,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025
16:49:31 -0300 Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> There is this upstream bug where
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 12:10:02 + Santiago Vila
wrote:
> Package: src:uim
> Version: 1:1.8.8-9.5
> Severity: important
> Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: gettext-0.23
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable using gettext 0.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 02:38:42 +0800 PaulLiu wrote:
> Hi Kentaro,
>
> About bug #1068202 on Debian bootstrap, do you have plans to do NMU?
>
> Yours,
> Paul
Recently, MR!3 was merged into master by olek@d.o.
So I expect olek will do it.
Regrads,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:13:24 +0100 Cyril Brulebois
wrote:
...
> > if I had a knowledge about d-i internals. :-<
>
> I think (I wanted but I'm not sure I did…) I said I would look into
> this after Trixie Alpha 1, so if you don't mind waiting a little,
> I'll look into it eventually…
Thanks!
I'm
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org
> It seems that fixing gtk-set-font is not enough, need to reboot
> /sbin/debian-installer (or something), but it causes flickering
> (blackout) and
> need to re-process localechooser (select language again)
> It might be annoying.
>
> How should I terminate them cor
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:16:17 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5
>
> Updated to decompress font on demand.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_
Hi,
> > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5
Updated to decompress font on demand.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/59
Created MR to generate fake font cache in advance.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debia
Hi,
> I've tried to fix with following MRs:
>
> * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5
I've updated to use MotoyaLCedar.
> *
> https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1
Closed. (No need anymore)
> * https://salsa.deb
As 2.29.5160.102 was landed on Debian sid, so next target is
2.29.5268.102.
But there is a blocker about working on it.
* It requires newer version of absl and protobuf.
And newer ones were uploaded to only experimental.
(absl 20240722.0 and protobuf 3.25.4 on experimental)
* Need to suppor
FYI:
I've uploaded some screenshot images to check tweaked font
name and default font size with rootskel-gtk outcome.
https://people.debian.org/~kenhys/bug-1037256/
> > And should the font size stay the same for Japanese?
>
> I'll check tweaked version later.
I've checked with 10pt MotoyaLCedar,VL Gothic and BIZ UDGothic.
* MotoyaLCedar 9pt vs 10pt
9pt: font typeface seems blurred, so it is a bit ugly.
10pt: ugly blurred rendering was reduced. it has
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:41:35 +0100 Cyril Brulebois
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28):
> > I've tried to fix with following MRs:
> >
> > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5
> > *
> > https://sals
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:33:19 +0100 Cyril Brulebois
wrote:
> Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28):
> > Thanks, I didn't know that way yet.
>
> You're welcome!
>
> > Surely it seems better to do it there.
>
> Alright, I've built (many more but I&
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 21:13:57 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow
> > up at the time. If we wanted to change the font for a specific
> > language, that's something that's alrea
>
> Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow up
> at the time. If we wanted to change the font for a specific language,
> that's something that's already supported with touching cdebconf.
>
> See src/usr/bin/gtk-set-font in the rootskel-gtk source package.
Thanks, I di
Source: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org, k...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
According to README [1], to know a list of available targets,
need to execute "make", but it takes huge amount of times.
* What exactly did yo
rom 22ba16ddf1f7246db8dd8da6deda53ef76f20a81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kentaro Hayashi
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:26:17 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gtk: support to apply custom styles with gtkrc
In the previous versions, it does not support
applying language specific custom style.
Without custom style,
I'm also have H950P, but it works by default.
It seems that the outcome of lsubs is bit different.
Bus 005 Device 006: ID 256c:006e Tablet Monitor
Since digimend-dkms 13-3, renamed kernel driver which help
to distinguish it easily original one and digimend-dkms provides one.
(It might be bund
I'll intend to NMU delayed upload/10 to fix this
issue [1] and other pending bugs. [2]
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1045435
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049806
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050420
https://bugs.debian.o
FYI:
As I noted previously, mozc_2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1
was landed on unstable now.
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1596502/accepted-mozc-2295160102dfsg-1-source-into-unstable/
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:42:01 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO mozc_2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1~exp1 is now
Package: protobuf
Version: 3.21.12-10+b1
severity: wishlist
Hi,
Recently, I've noticed that auto-protobuf transition was recorded,
but it is not proceeded on-going yet. [1]
mozc package depends to protobuf and for upgrading to newer Mozc,
it requires more newer version of protobuf such as proto
Hi,
IMHO mozc_2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1~exp1 is now ready to ship it, so
to make things forward, I've uploaded mozc_2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1
into DELAYED Queue with max delay (15-day).
Regards,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:42:59 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:28:10 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:11:46 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
> > wrote:
> > > There is a blocker uploading to unstable.
> > >
> > &g
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:28:10 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:11:46 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
> wrote:
> > There is a blocker uploading to unstable.
> >
> > * uim-mozc: candidate words are shown with flickering
>
>
> NOTE:
>
> This beha
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:29:49 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> > FYI: Mozc's tags:
> >
> > * 2.30.5544.102 Require abseil 20240116.1 or later
> > * 2.29.5544.102 GYP was deprecated
> > * 2.29.5374.102
> > * 2.29.5268.102 No gtk renderer anymore, need Qt.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:11:46 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> There is a blocker uploading to unstable.
>
> * uim-mozc: candidate words are shown with flickering
NOTE:
This behavior is observed with uim-mozc on GNOME.
(explicitly switched to uim-mozc with im-config configuration)
13:23 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> FYI:
>
> It is hard directly upgrade to Mozc 2.30, so I've
> tried minor version of Mozc upgrade (from 2.28.4715.102 to
> 2.29.5160.102) for experimental.
>
> Accepted mozc 2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1~exp1
> https://lists.debian.org/d
FYI:
It is hard directly upgrade to Mozc 2.30, so I've
tried minor version of Mozc upgrade (from 2.28.4715.102 to
2.29.5160.102) for experimental.
Accepted mozc 2.29.5160.102+dfsg-1~exp1
https://lists.debian.org/debian-experimental-changes/2024/11/msg00339.html
FYI:
I've created merge request.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/munin/-/merge_requests/10
Regards,
FYI:
I'm testing built packages by myself mainly fcitx5-mozc.
https://github.com/kenhys/mozc/releases/tag/debian-2.29.5160.102
Hi,
I've created merge request.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/how-can-i-help/-/merge_requests/2
Regards,
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:58:05 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> It seems that given helpitem's package data is empty.
>
> {"type"=>"testing-autorm",
> "hash"=>"0eb6b1e5e7f22c5d6211adb3e29791d6",
> "source"=>"
> /usr/bin/install: cannot stat './html/_static/webpack-macros.html':
> No such file or directory
It seems that this error was caused by updating
python3-pydata-sphinx-theme (0.15.4+dfsg-2).
Regards,
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:26:23 +0200 Paul Gevers
wrote:
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/munin/testing/amd64/53125959/
> 446s --- expected_plugins 2024-10-16 16:17:20.130511035 +
> 446s +++ all_without_network_interfaces 2024-10-16
> 16:17:20.130511035
> FYI: Mozc's tags:
>
> * 2.30.5544.102 Require abseil 20240116.1 or later
> * 2.29.5544.102 GYP was deprecated
> * 2.29.5374.102
> * 2.29.5268.102 No gtk renderer anymore, need Qt.
> * 2.29.5160.102 The last version that gtk renderer is available.
Since 2.29.5160.102, --use_gyp_for_ibus_build op
Source: mozc
Version: 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
The upstream repository has released 2.30.5544.102.
It would be nice to upgrade the Debian package to that release.
But currently, there are technical difficulty exists to following
ups
FYI: Now uploaded into NEW queue.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/deskflow_1.17.0+dfsg-1.html
Regards,
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: HAYASHI Kentaro
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: deskflow
Version : 1.17.0+r1
Upstream Contact: Nick Bolton
* URL : https://github.com/deskflow/deskflow
* License
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi, attached patch will solve FTBFS.
I hope it will help you.
Regards,
Description: Fix FTBFS #1081856 invalid conversion pointer
Fix FTBFS #1081856 invalid conversion pointer, this error
was raised from agg_font_freetype.cpp because of type mismatch
with 'unsigned char
Recently, I've also hit this bug.
This bug was already fixed in upstream but not released yet.
I hope patch was applied in Debian because it breaks idempotence.
FYI:
copy module: modify time on the file (mtime) is not updating
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/83013
Regards,
Hi,
I've stepped on this bug on 6.10.6-1 and it seems that this
bug was fixed by 6.10.7-1.
I guess the following change affects us, but I'm not sure yet.
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1561446/accepted-linux-signed-amd64-61071-source-into-unstable/
> - Bluetooth: HCI: Invert LE State quirk to
FYI:
It seems that this FTBFS issue was already fixed in master, but not
released yet.
https://salsa.debian.org/nlp-ja-team/mecab/-/commit/0c8c0d1b3730758ef0ea98927e25c12596e39cf9
Regards,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:16:05 +0200 Santiago Vila
wrote:
> Package: src:docker.io
> Version: 26.1.4+dfsg1-9
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to
> build:
FYI: It seems that go install fails like this:
go
There was feedback about gr- namespace.
It seems that gr- namespace is already used for GNU Radio.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/08/msg00084.html
It might better to improve short description.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kentaro Hayashi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gr-framework
Version : 0.73.7
Upstream Contact: Josef Heinen
* URL : https://github.com/sciapp/gr
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Hi,
It seems that it becomes serious because mutter 46 was landed onto
unstable.
we can't fresh install bugdie-desktop anymore...
Any progress?
This FTBFS was caused by rapidjson [1]
and fixed-in-upstream. [2]
It seems that upstream will not ship new one,
so need to wait patched version of rapidjson.
[1] rapidjson: FTBFS with GCC-14
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075575
[2]
https://github.com/Tencent/rapidjson/pul
Hi,
FYI: I've created MR to send this feedback.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lz4/-/merge_requests/8
Regards,
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:12:24 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi, I've tried a PoC patch to build lz4 with CMake.
>
> It is not fully achieved yet because
> it causes a diff for .symbols, that is not intended.
>
> In other wor
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:41:02 +0200 Daniel Leidert
wrote:
> Package: remmina
> Version: 1.4.35+dfsg-1+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> when I try to connect to a windows (11) system, I get errors saying
> something like "check security
0 2024-04-03 02:18
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblz4.so -> liblz4.so.1
Anyway, I hope it will help to make it forward.
>From bbd1377d5ffcc2155909a6ce22142bc23612f5e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kentaro Hayashi
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:58:30 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Use CMake to build
Source: lz4
Version: 1.9.4-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Currently, liblz4-dev does not ship lz4Config.cmake which is
used to find LZ4 from CMake.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineff
Control: tags -1 pending
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/merge_requests/2
FYI:
MR!2 was already merged.
Source: nextpnr
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 0.7-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
nextpnr fails to build on armel, armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nextpnr&arch=armel&ver=0.7-1&stamp=1714863100&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status
FYI:
I've created MR for it.
https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/merge_requests/3
s/cpp/bsd_cc_toolchain_config.bzl:
flag_groups = [flag_group(flags = ["-std=c++0x"])],
Regards,
>From e7f756e9e328516517e7b14ad1070c41c5688d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kentaro Hayashi
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:36:37 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Fix FTBFS with std=c++0x (C++11)
It will
Control: tags -1 - unreproducible
Control: found -1 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.3
I've tried with newer mozc_2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.3 again,
it was reproduced.
Drop unappropriate unreproducible tag.
Regargs,
FYI:
I've also sent patch [1] as MR for mozc. [2]
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1045435#10
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mozc/-/merge_requests/11
Regards,
I've just tried it with debian:sid container,
it seems that there is no test failure about 4 reported failures.
[ OK ] XWindowsKeyStateTests.setActiveGroup_poll_groupIsNotSet
(21 ms) [ RUN ]
XWindowsKeyStateTests.setActiveGroup_customGroup_groupWasSet
[2024-05-27T11:26:31] DEBUG: openi
On Sat, 4 May 2024 22:53:36 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> I've attached PoC patches which are
> based on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059706#33
>
I've created MR too.
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/epics-base
Source: mozc
Version: 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
When try to build package from git repository, it
can't be built because of missing pristine tar commmit.
* What exactly did you do (or not
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Hi,
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a(arena.o): relocation
> > R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against symbol
> > `_ZN6google8protobuf8internal15ThreadSafeArena13thread_cache_E' can
> > not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld: faile
ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-doublebuild
>
>From 987fc8f5ffe6a9bb2f9d163b557db67b0180d655 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kentaro Hayashi
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 21:49:36 +090
Hi,
On Fri, 17 May 2024 21:16:15 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:06:37 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
>
> > This issue was already fixed in upstream.
> >
> > Non-public Abseil API is used for CLI parsing
> > h
Control: tags -1 patch
On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:06:37 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI
> This issue was already fixed in upstream.
>
> Non-public Abseil API is used for CLI parsing
> https://github.com/google/mozc/issues/790
>
> Above ftbfs error was fixed with the following commi
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Hi,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:35:41 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: mozc
> Version: 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
> the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Source: rust-coreutils
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 0.0.26-1
Dear Maintainer,
rust-coreutils fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-coreutils&arch=armel&ver=0.0.26-1&stamp=1714571498&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?p
Source: rust-mimalloc
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 0.1.29-1+b2
Dear Maintainer,
rust-mimalloc fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-mimalloc&arch=armhf&ver=0.1.29-1%2Bb2&stamp=1714283560&raw=0
Regards,
Source: rust-libmimalloc-sys
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 0.1.25-1+b2
Dear Maintainer,
rust-libmimalloc-sys fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-libmimalloc-sys&arch=armhf&ver=0.1.25-1%2Bb2&stamp=1714271391&raw=0
Regards,
n Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kentaro Hayashi
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 21:39:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] debian/rule: fix embedded path of installed path
Without this change, build root path will be
embedded into epics-base.pc.
See documentation/RELEASE_NOTES.md.
Signed-off-by: Kentaro Hayashi
---
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:31:03 +0300 Andrius Merkys
wrote:
> control: reopen -1
> control: found -1 7.0.8+dfsg1-1
>
> Hello,
>
> As epics-base.pc still contains incorrect paths, I am reopening this
> bug.
Maybe FINAL_LOCATION=/usr must be specified in debian/rules.
override_dh_auto_build:
Source: rust-servo-freetype-sys
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 4.0.5-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
rust-servo-freetype-sys fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-servo-freetype-sys&arch=armel&ver=4.0.5-2&stamp=16888
Source: qwinff
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
qwinff fails to build on armhel,armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qwinff&arch=armel&ver=0.2.1%2Bgit20201215-2&stamp=1685891638&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.
Source: netgen
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 6.2.2401+dfsg1-1.1+b1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
netgen fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=netgen&arch=armhf&ver=6.2.2401%2Bdfsg1-1.1%2Bb1&stamp=1712667539&raw=0
Regard
Source: lammps
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 20240207+dfsg-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
lammps fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lammps&arch=armhf&ver=20240207%2Bdfsg-1.1%2Bb1&stamp=1712551793&raw=0
Note tha
Source: macromoleculebuilder
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 4.0.0+dfsg-3.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
macromoleculebuilder fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=macromoleculebuilder&arch=armhf&ver=4.0.0%2Bdfsg-3.
Source: flexc++
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 2.15.00-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
flexc++ fails to build on armel, armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=flexc%2B%2B&arch=armel&ver=2.15.00-1&stamp=1712127698&raw=0
https://buildd.debian
Source: bisonc++
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 6.08.00-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
bisonc++ fails to build on armel, armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bisonc%2B%2B&arch=armel&ver=6.08.00-1&stamp=1712127818&raw=0
https://buildd.deb
Source: fpzip
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 1.3.0-3
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
fpzip fails to build on armel, armhf, i386.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=fpzip&arch=armel&ver=1.3.0-3&stamp=1685884820&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/st
Source: docker-registry
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 2.8.2+ds1-1+b4
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
docker-registry fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=docker-registry&arch=armhf&ver=2.8.2%2Bds1-1%2Bb4&stamp=1704669577&
Source: quorum
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 1.1.2-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
quorum fails to build on armel, armhf, i386.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=quorum&arch=armel&ver=1.1.2-2&stamp=1701603381&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/
Source: sssd
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
sssd fails to build on armel, armhf.
Though test suite failure was already reported, but
target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new
bug to raise atten
Source: libgtkada
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 24.0.0-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
libgtkada fails to build on armhf.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtkada&arch=armhf&ver=24.0.0-2&stamp=1710988310&raw=0
Regards,
Source: libgtkada
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 24.0.0-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
libgtkada fails to build on armel.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtkada&arch=armel&ver=24.0.0-2&stamp=1711025590&raw=0
Regards,
Control: notfound -1 2.6.0-1
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Source: ccls
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 0.20230717-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer,
ccls fails to build on armhf, i386.
FYI:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ccls&arch=armhf&ver=0.20230717-1&stamp=1694985920&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/sta
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
