On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 13:15 +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:07:01 -0700 Anthony Fok wrote:
> > * Add "Depends: fonts-urw-base35" and "Recommends: fonts-texgyre"
> > These fonts were shipped with lilypond-fonts in 2.22 but removed in
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 10:37 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> [...] text fonts must be shipped separately [...]
It turns out, this should be pretty straightforward: Just add
dependencies to fonts-urw-base35 and (optionally, as a suggest?) to
fonts-texgyre. They should be shipping the .otf versi
Hi Anthony,
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 17:58 -0700, Anthony Fok wrote:
> And... lilypond 2.24.0-1 has entered Debian! Though I already found a
> bug when upgrading lilypond-doc due to /usr/share/info/lilypond
> symlink conflict, my own fault for not testing it thoroughly enough
> before upload. Thank
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 11:47 -0700, Anthony Fok wrote:
> > I'd be very hesitant to include Guile 2.2 in bookworm since I believe
> > it's explicitly not supported upstream and hasn't had a single commit
> > in over two years.
> >
> > If there's any chance LilyPond will support something newer in a
On Wed, 2022-12-28 at 22:16 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:27:32 +1100 John Zaitseff
> wrote:
> > Package: lilypond
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I know it's a lot to ask for :-), but now that LilyPond 2.24.0 has
> > been releas
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:27:32 +1100 John Zaitseff
wrote:
> Package: lilypond
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I know it's a lot to ask for :-), but now that LilyPond 2.24.0 has
> been released, it would be good to have it in Debian. Let me know
> if I can help bring this about!
Yes, please 🙂 actually, a
6 matches
Mail list logo
