Package: gnome-shell
Version: 43.9-0+deb12u2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when switching to the overview (pressing super key or using the active
top left corner), a message is written to the syslog containing
g_closure_unref: assertion 'closure->ref_count > 0' failed
For every extension
Package: apt
Version: 1.4.9
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when upgrading a fresh install of Stretch to Buster (German
localization) and having a Gnome desktop environment, libpam0g:amd64
fails to configure due to missing locales:
Preparing to unpack .../libpam0g_1.3.1-5_amd64.deb ...
Unpa
Package: apt
Version: 1.4.9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
on running apt-get update, sometimes the AppStream subprocess returns an
error:
The AppStream system cache was updated, but some errors were detected,
which might lead to missing metadata. Refer to the verbose log for more
Am Sonntag, den 22.06.2014, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> * certtool --verify --load-ca-certificate cacert.pem --infile \
BTW: The --verify parameter doesn't exist in the stable package. It was
introduced afterwards.
But cat-ing them into one testfile and verify the chain then works,
yo
l
is valid, and I'd consider it a bug, whether I'd used the wrong command
to try to give you guys clues or not.
BR
Jo
Am Sonntag, den 22.06.2014, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> On 2014-06-22 Jo Drexl wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 22.06.2014, 08:22 +0200 schrieb Andreas M
Am Sonntag, den 22.06.2014, 08:22 +0200 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> On 2014-06-22 Jo Drexl wrote:
> > After installing the stable package and rerunning 'certtool -e
> > --load-ca-certificate cacert.pem --infile servercert.pem', the outcome
> > was:
> [...]
>
After installing the stable package and rerunning 'certtool -e
--load-ca-certificate cacert.pem --infile servercert.pem', the outcome
was:
Certificate[0]: CN=testserver,O=Server.inc
Issued by: CN=testserver,O=Server.inc
certtool: the last certificate is not self signed
With the backports
Package: gnutls-bin
Version: 3.2.15-1~bpo70+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Wishing for a stable and secure remote qemu/kvm-VM, managed by virt-manager and
libvirt
* What exactly did
8 matches
Mail list logo