Hmm, the license statements are like so on these 4:
/* hmmstats.h - Stuff for doing statistical analysis in general and
* hidden Markov models in particular.
*
* This file is copyright 2000 Jim Kent, but license is hereby
* granted for all use - public, private or commercial. */
not what
Actually it may be the stronger GNU I really object to. I don't want to
force anyone that uses my code to license their code the same way.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Jim Kent wrote:
> I"m sorry, I don't support the GPL at all!
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:07 P
gt; package is considered a derivative work? If so, there are probably an
> enormous number of CRAN/Bioc packages in violation. My choice of
> license for rtracklayer should not affect the
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:47
I"m sorry, I don't support the GPL at all!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0800, Jim Kent a écrit :
> > Sorry not to get back to you sooner. I'm just getting a lot of
> > post-vacation mail pile up.
>
and
> > > you want to use an existing license (which I recommend) then you are
> > > looking for a copyleft license.
> > >
> > > I like this interactive guide to software licenses:
> > > http://oss-watch.ac.uk/apps/licdiff/
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec
t;
> > > 'm not sure whether I mentioned it before but we had a long standing
> > > discussion with Joe Felsenstein about PHYLIP and finally he confirmed
> > > that the gain he had over *years* was so small that the loss to get
> > > better distribution, cooper
r you might be interested in this kind of
> experiences - at least Joe has decided in 2014 for a BSD-2-clause
> license.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:22:12PM -0700, Jim Kent wrote:
> > Hmm. The reason I'm comfortable having
7 matches
Mail list logo
